Skip to content

[stdlib][test] Fix message test expectation. #32199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2020

Conversation

3405691582
Copy link
Member

In #32137 direct environment variable parsing was introduced, the
availability of which is branched by a preprocessor symbol (ENVIRON)
if the environment is available directly on the platform, or if getenv
must be used.

The message expectation in the unit test in the however diverged on the
non-ENVIRON branch, causing a unit test failure. This PR fixes the
expectation, but also, while we're here, OpenBSD supports the ENVIRON
branch anyway.

In swiftlang#32137 direct environment variable parsing was introduced, the
availability of which is branched by a preprocessor symbol (`ENVIRON`)
if the environment is available directly on the platform, or if getenv
must be used.

The message expectation in the unit test in the however diverged on the
non-`ENVIRON` branch, causing a unit test failure. This PR fixes the
expectation, but also, while we're here, OpenBSD supports the `ENVIRON`
branch anyway.
@3405691582
Copy link
Member Author

cc @mikeash

@mikeash
Copy link
Contributor

mikeash commented Jun 5, 2020

Looks good, thank you! I must have failed to run the test on the getenv code after changing that message.

Copy link
Member

@compnerd compnerd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@compnerd
Copy link
Member

compnerd commented Jun 5, 2020

@swift-ci please test

@compnerd compnerd merged commit 0e892a9 into swiftlang:master Jun 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants