[AutoDiff] Generalize handling of semantic result parameters #67230
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@swift-ci please test |
|
@rxwei gentle ping :) |
rxwei
reviewed
Jul 26, 2023
Handle differentiation of inouts via semantic result parameter abstraction.
Co-authored-by: Richard Wei <[email protected]>
…t be non-wrt and not differentiable at all
|
@rxwei I renamed the methods outside of autodiff code. Also added 2 related commits from WIP class differentiation branch that are relevant for semantic result parameters. PTAL Thanks! |
rxwei
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2023
|
@swift-ci please test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduce "semantic result parameters" abstraction and treat inouts via this abstraction only.
Do not consider non-wrt semantic result parameters as semantic results
Fixes #67174