Skip to content

Unit test msgpack-lite #127

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Totktonada opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Unit test msgpack-lite #127

Totktonada opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
backlog code health Improve code readability, simplify maintenance and so on prio1

Comments

@Totktonada
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Totktonada Totktonada added the code health Improve code readability, simplify maintenance and so on label Jan 28, 2019
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2019
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2019
We are using a borrowed implementation of the MsgPack library w/o
available tests. In addition, there are a few modifications that were
done on our side. It requires the tests that will cover at least typical
use cases related to (de-)serialization between designated java types
and message pack types.

This commit introduces a set of test cases that check correctness of
packing/unpacking according to the MsgPack specification.

Closes: #127
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2019
We are using a borrowed implementation of the MsgPack library w/o
available tests. In addition, there are a few modifications that were
done on our side. It requires the tests that will cover at least typical
use cases related to (de-)serialization between designated java types
and message pack types.

This commit introduces a set of test cases that check correctness of
packing/unpacking according to the MsgPack specification.

Closes: #127
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2019
We are using a borrowed implementation of the MsgPack library w/o
available tests. In addition, there are a few modifications that were
done on our side. It requires the tests that will cover at least typical
use cases related to (de-)serialization between designated java types
and message pack types.

This commit introduces a set of test cases that check correctness of
packing/unpacking according to the MsgPack specification.

Closes: #127
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2019
We are using a borrowed implementation of the MsgPack library w/o
available tests. In addition, there are a few modifications that were
done on our side. It requires the tests that will cover at least typical
use cases related to (de-)serialization between designated java types
and message pack types.

This commit introduces a set of test cases that check correctness of
packing/unpacking according to the MsgPack specification.

Closes: #127
nicktorwald added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2019
We are using a borrowed implementation of the MsgPack library w/o
available tests. In addition, there are a few modifications that were
done on our side. It requires the tests that will cover at least typical
use cases related to (de-)serialization between designated java types
and message pack types.

This commit introduces a set of test cases that check correctness of
packing/unpacking according to the MsgPack specification.

Closes: #127
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backlog code health Improve code readability, simplify maintenance and so on prio1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants