Skip to content

Support of Statement.setMaxFieldSize #206

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 14, 2019

Conversation

nicktorwald
Copy link

Add a capability to limit resultSet values of character or binary types.

Closes: #189

@nicktorwald nicktorwald force-pushed the nicktorwald/gh-189-max-field-size branch from 32f4306 to 3506132 Compare July 18, 2019 18:18
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.8%) to 75.064% when pulling 3506132 on nicktorwald/gh-189-max-field-size into b53e0ba on master.

Copy link
Member

@Totktonada Totktonada left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay except a test re binary value trimming.

@nicktorwald nicktorwald force-pushed the nicktorwald/gh-189-max-field-size branch from 3506132 to 5a7e158 Compare August 14, 2019 12:30
Add a capability to limit resultSet values of character or binary types.

Closes: #189
@nicktorwald nicktorwald force-pushed the nicktorwald/gh-189-max-field-size branch from 5a7e158 to 0fdc65f Compare August 14, 2019 12:50
@nicktorwald nicktorwald merged commit 66a4fbd into master Aug 14, 2019
@nicktorwald nicktorwald deleted the nicktorwald/gh-189-max-field-size branch August 15, 2019 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

jdbc: Support Statement max field size
3 participants