Skip to content

this expressions #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 4, 2015
Merged

this expressions #3

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 4, 2015

Conversation

robrix
Copy link
Contributor

@robrix robrix commented Nov 4, 2015

Fixes #2.

I named the production this_expression to match ESTree’s spec.

I haven’t added arguments in this PR since a) there’s no such production in ESTree & I’m unsure how faithful we want to be to that, and b) I wanted to be sure I’d got this right first 😊

@robrix
Copy link
Contributor Author

robrix commented Nov 4, 2015

screen shot 2015-11-04 at 10 30 24

Wow! I guess that’s pretty characteristic of grammar changes since parser.c gets (essentially) rewritten.

@maxbrunsfeld
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, sounds like there's no need to add arguments then. Thanks for the fix!

maxbrunsfeld pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2015
@maxbrunsfeld maxbrunsfeld merged commit cf0ef32 into tree-sitter:master Nov 4, 2015
@robrix robrix deleted the this-expressions branch November 4, 2015 17:07
@robrix
Copy link
Contributor Author

robrix commented Nov 4, 2015

🙇 thanks for the merge! 😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants