(docs): Improve README file for Navi

[anqueue]

Description

This pull request updates the README file for Navi, making several improvements to its structure and content. First, I have moved the README file from its previous location in a nested folder (navi/navi) to the root folder (navi). This change should make it easier to find and access the file, especially for new users who are not familiar with the project's directory structure.

In addition to the structural changes, I have also made several improvements to the grammar and readability of the document. Specifically, I have corrected grammar mistakes and rephrased several sections for clarity. These changes should make the README more accessible and understandable for all users.

Please let me know if you have any feedback or questions about these changes.

[babuloseo]

Do you think we should rewrite it all in Python? I am thinking we can get faster code speedup than that language with oxidization, if we try to implement quantum machine learning algorithms instead and essentially build our own quantum computer to do under 5 billion recomms under 1*10^-15 femtoseconds. We will write an AI for our quantum computer that disallows Rusteceans, by having them go through the sorting hat.

[mmattbtw]

Excellent work or achievement, demonstrating a high degree of proficiency, skill, or mastery in a particular field or endeavor. The results produced are of exceptional quality and surpass the expectations set forth, indicating a level of dedication, expertise, and commitment that is truly remarkable. Such accomplishments deserve recognition and praise, as they represent a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge, innovation, and progress in a given domain. In short, this is an outstanding accomplishment that reflects a deep understanding and appreciation of the task at hand, as well as a strong desire to excel and achieve excellence.

[cmcdev-code]

While Python and Rust are both powerful languages, they have different strengths and weaknesses. Rewriting everything in Python may not necessarily lead to faster code speedup compared to Rust, especially if Rust was already chosen for its speed and memory safety.

Moreover, building a quantum computer from scratch is a significant undertaking and requires extensive expertise in quantum physics, computer engineering, and software development. It is not a simple matter of implementing quantum machine learning algorithms and disallowing Rust developers from contributing to the project. Additionally, quantum computers are still in the early stages of development, and it may be challenging to achieve the level of performance you described.

In summary, while it's essential to explore new technologies and approaches, it's crucial to weigh the costs and benefits carefully. Rewriting everything in Python may not necessarily lead to faster performance, and building a quantum computer is a complex and challenging endeavor that requires extensive knowledge and resources.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[ElijahPepe]

Note should be placed before shell files.

[ElijahPepe]

"as well as" implies conjunction with a positive statement. The correct verbiage here would probably be "or":

However, we have not included the test and benchmark code, or various configuration files, due to data security concerns.

I would also recommend dropping the "the":

However, we have not included test and benchmark code, or various configuration files, due to data security concerns.

The comma between "code" and "or", and "files" and "due", has a panache that draws attention from the next clause. An em dash might be necessary here.

[dzhao]

agree. will fix in original code and propogate to the open source version.

[dzhao]

appreciate the suggestion.

[byronrode]

While Python and Rust are both powerful languages, they have different strengths and weaknesses. Rewriting everything in Python may not necessarily lead to faster code speedup compared to Rust, especially if Rust was already chosen for its speed and memory safety.

Moreover, building a quantum computer from scratch is a significant undertaking and requires extensive expertise in quantum physics, computer engineering, and software development. It is not a simple matter of implementing quantum machine learning algorithms and disallowing Rust developers from contributing to the project. Additionally, quantum computers are still in the early stages of development, and it may be challenging to achieve the level of performance you described.

In summary, while it's essential to explore new technologies and approaches, it's crucial to weigh the costs and benefits carefully. Rewriting everything in Python may not necessarily lead to faster performance, and building a quantum computer is a complex and challenging endeavor that requires extensive knowledge and resources.

Not going to lie, this reads like it was asked via ChatGPT — not saying it was; just pointing out a humorous assumption — and I’m keen to see what prompt it returns when asked to create a prompt from the given answer, ala, Midjourney’s /describe prompt.

[byronrode]

"Can you provide a summary of the differences between Python and Rust, and the challenges involved in building a quantum computer from scratch? Also, could you touch on the importance of weighing the costs and benefits of exploring new technologies?"