Skip to content

docs: typo in rewrites page #25377

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2021
Merged

docs: typo in rewrites page #25377

merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2021

Conversation

msidqi
Copy link
Contributor

@msidqi msidqi commented May 23, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Bug

  • Related issues linked using fixes #number
  • Integration tests added

Feature

  • Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
  • Related issues linked using fixes #number
  • Integration tests added
  • Documentation added
  • Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.

Documentation / Examples

  • Make sure the linting passes

@timneutkens timneutkens merged commit 2e5fac7 into vercel:canary May 23, 2021
@sync-by-unito sync-by-unito bot mentioned this pull request May 26, 2021
Closed
flybayer pushed a commit to blitz-js/next.js that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2021
@msidqi
docs: typo in rewrites page (vercel#25377)
a281439
This was referenced Jul 29, 2021
Open
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2021
Open
This was referenced Jan 12, 2022
Open
Open
Open
Open
@vercel vercel locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@timneutkens timneutkens timneutkens approved these changes

@divmain divmain Awaiting requested review from divmain

@ijjk ijjk Awaiting requested review from ijjk

@lfades lfades Awaiting requested review from lfades

@shuding shuding Awaiting requested review from shuding

+1 more reviewer

@leerob leerob leerob approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@msidqi @timneutkens @leerob @ijjk