Skip to content

Move VideoFrameMetadata dfn to WebCodecs #596

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2022

Conversation

tidoust
Copy link
Member

@tidoust tidoust commented Oct 21, 2022

A registry cannot contain normative IDL, so the base definition of the VideoFrameMetadata dictionary should remain in WebCodecs.

Also note that while the registry will be published as a "W3C Draft Registry", the document in the repo remains an "Editor's Draft". Updating the status accordingly.


Preview | Diff

A registry cannot contain normative IDL, so the base definition of the
`VideoFrameMetadata` dictionary should remain in WebCodecs.

Also note that while the registry will be published as a "W3C Draft Registry",
the document in the repo remains an "Editor's Draft". Updating the status
accordingly.
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<pre class='metadata'>
Title: WebCodecs VideoFrame Metadata Registry
Repository: w3c/webcodecs
Status: DRY
Status: ED
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although it has "Draft" in the title, DRY is a status for documents published under /TR. All documents in the repo are "Editor's Drafts". There is no DRY-ED status in authoring tools for now to qualify an "Editor's Draft of a Registry", so using "ED" as fallback (I see the status of the Editor's Draft of the Codec registry is NOTE-ED for now, that's really treated the same way as ED internally and produces the same boilerplate).

Copy link
Contributor

@youennf youennf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dalecurtis dalecurtis merged commit 1ceb71c into w3c:main Oct 21, 2022
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
SHA: 1ceb71c
Reason: push, by dalecurtis

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@dalecurtis
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm, https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/actions/runs/3298886029 failed after this. Not sure what's going on. @tidoust ?

@tidoust
Copy link
Member Author

tidoust commented Oct 21, 2022

There seems to have been a temporary network hiccup when exchanging with the W3C Echidna server to check on progress of a publication request, but I confirm everything got published!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants