-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
Move VideoFrameMetadata dfn to WebCodecs #596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
A registry cannot contain normative IDL, so the base definition of the `VideoFrameMetadata` dictionary should remain in WebCodecs. Also note that while the registry will be published as a "W3C Draft Registry", the document in the repo remains an "Editor's Draft". Updating the status accordingly.
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
<pre class='metadata'> | |||
Title: WebCodecs VideoFrame Metadata Registry | |||
Repository: w3c/webcodecs | |||
Status: DRY | |||
Status: ED |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although it has "Draft" in the title, DRY
is a status for documents published under /TR. All documents in the repo are "Editor's Drafts". There is no DRY-ED
status in authoring tools for now to qualify an "Editor's Draft of a Registry", so using "ED" as fallback (I see the status of the Editor's Draft of the Codec registry is NOTE-ED
for now, that's really treated the same way as ED
internally and produces the same boilerplate).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 1ceb71c Reason: push, by dalecurtis Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Hmm, https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/actions/runs/3298886029 failed after this. Not sure what's going on. @tidoust ? |
There seems to have been a temporary network hiccup when exchanging with the W3C Echidna server to check on progress of a publication request, but I confirm everything got published! |
A registry cannot contain normative IDL, so the base definition of the
VideoFrameMetadata
dictionary should remain in WebCodecs.Also note that while the registry will be published as a "W3C Draft Registry", the document in the repo remains an "Editor's Draft". Updating the status accordingly.
Preview | Diff