NOTE: This is work in progress

DEP: const functions and methods for Dart

Goal

Introduce syntax for const function/method (CFM). CFM is:

a function/method whose result can be used as a fragment of a const expression.

Non-goals

Proposed is simple syntactic sugar on top of the existing const expressions. const expressions can be syntactically and lexically transformed to the existing syntax that is accepted by current Dart implementations. Anything that requires more than static transformation is beyond the scope of this proposal. For example, this proposal does not include:

control flow in const expressions
lazy evaluation

Syntax

A CFM is declared like a normal function/method and:

has const modifier prior to function/method signature
its body is a const expression

CFMs may accept parameters, however, the same restrictions apply as those imposed on the const constructors.

Call sites

Because CFMs are also normal functions they may be used in non-const expressions. In const expressions, however, the following restrictions are imposed (both means applied to both functions and methods):

(both) their arguments must be const expressions
(both) must be preceded by const (see also optional const proposal)
(methods only) they may only be called on a const value (and therefore may only be defined on classes with const constructors)

Motivating examples

Here's a very simplified "fluent" binding API for Angular 2 dependency injection:

class Binding {
  final Type type;
  final dynamic value;

  const Binding(this.type, this.value);
}

class BindingBuilder {
  final Type type;

  /// Note that class declaring `const` method is itself `const`.
  const BindingBuilder(this.type);

  /// A const method.
  ///
  /// Body of a `const` method is a `const` expression.
  const toValue(value) => const Binding(
    this.type,  // ok to refer to `this` as `this` is itself const
    value  // parameters are enforced to be `const` so can also be used
  );
}

/// A const function.
///
/// Body of a `const` function is a `const` expression.
const bind(Type t) => const BindingBuilder(t);

void main() {
  const binding = const bind(String).toValue('hello, world!');
}

// In Angular 2 apps, this fluent syntax may be used to declare bindings in
// component annotations, e.g.:
@Component(
  injector: const [
    const bind(String).toValue('hello, world!')
  ]
)
class MyComponent {
}

Semantics

A call to a const function in a const expression is semantically equivalent to static inlining the function into the expression.

Dynamic dispatch and const methods

In general, Dart method calls are subject to dynamic dispatch. This could present a problem for implementing const methods. Take the following expression for example:

const bind(String).toValue('hello, world!');

Generally, Dart runtimes are free to assume that the return type of bind is dynamic and therefore it would not be possible to statically prove that the call to toValue satisfies const semantics. Due to the inlining semantics, however, this does not pose a problem for const function calls. After inlining the call to bind the expression unwraps into the following:

const BindingBuilder(String).toValue('hello, world!');

There is no longer any ambiguity about toValue and it can be dispatched statically with (hopefully) few infrastructure changes in existing Dart compilers and analyzers.

Complete example

The following examples demonstrates how a CFM expression unwraps into a plain old Dart const.

// the example expression from above:
const bind(String).toValue('hello, world!');

// is unwrapped by inlining functions and methods:

// Step 1: inline `bind`
const BindingBuilder(String).toValue('hello, world!');

// Step 2: inline `toValue` - subject to new dispatch semantics
const Binding(const BindingBuilder(String).type, 'hello, world!');

// Step 3: inline `type` - subject to new dispatch semantics
const Binding(String, 'hello, world!');

The final unwrapped version of the expression is compiant with the existing spec for const expressions. The remaining interpretation of the expression can be done using existing language rules.

Interaction with other proposals

Optional const

With optional const proposed here the syntax could be improved even further:

@Component(
  injector: [
    bind(String).toValue('hello, world!')
  ]
)
class MyComponent {
}

Method (or function) piping

This was proposed twice already and logged (although I haven't seen a DEP yet). Function pipes is way to give Dart Scala-style implicits without the disadvantages of being implicit (the pipe syntax is explicit) and without a need to change language semantics. The relationship to this DEP is that in the presence of function pipes there would be less pressure to implement const methods and instead use function pipes, like this:

// const method
const bind(String).toValue('hello, world!');

// function pipes
const bind(String) |> toValue('hello, world!');

License

yjbanov/dart-const-functions

ErrorLooks like something went wrong!

About

Resources

License

Uh oh!

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

Packages 0

Uh oh!

Error
Looks like something went wrong!

Packages