-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
boards: arm: add probe-rs runner for RP2350 boards #94542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The addition is good. I'd like to see the changes sorted in a way that aides readers in the future: chronological/appending changes make things harder to skim through IME.
@@ -16,3 +18,4 @@ board_runner_args(uf2 "--board-id=RP2350") | |||
|
|||
include(${ZEPHYR_BASE}/boards/common/uf2.board.cmake) | |||
include(${ZEPHYR_BASE}/boards/common/openocd.board.cmake) | |||
include(${ZEPHYR_BASE}/boards/common/probe-rs.board.cmake) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorting this would involve out of scope changes. Avoided for this reason as generally maintainers are opposed of format changes in functional change PRs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's fair. FWIW I'm happy with PRs that have a series of commits that are "sorting ahead of adding more things", then "add the new thing" in the net commit. Yes, combining these in one commit would be bad.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should I do this here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I think it's ok as-is, and would be added scope creep.
8ac3096
to
557a2ee
Compare
Add the chip parameter for probe-rs. Verified on Feather RP2350. Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <[email protected]>
Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud |
Add the chip parameter for probe-rs. Verified on Feather RP2350.
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov [email protected]