You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this case, there is no ambiguity in the meaning of break within the block, since there is no parent loop. The repeated blk: and :blk labels add code noise; would it be possible to allow for anonymous/unlabeled blocks when there is no ambiguity? Example:
Consider the following snippet:
In this case, there is no ambiguity in the meaning of
break
within the block, since there is no parent loop. The repeatedblk:
and:blk
labels add code noise; would it be possible to allow for anonymous/unlabeled blocks when there is no ambiguity? Example:(I realize there are better ways to do the above, it's merely a contrived example).
In cases where there is ambiguity (e.g. in a while or for loop), the labels would still need to be explicitly defined.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: