Upgrade Microsoft.Data.SqlClient to New Version #2702
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RubenCerna2079
requested review from
Alekhya-Polavarapu,
Aniruddh25,
aaronburtle,
neeraj-sharma2592,
ravishetye,
rusamant,
sezal98,
sourabh1007,
souvikghosh04 and
vadeveka
as code owners
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 6 pipeline(s). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the Microsoft.Data.SqlClient package version to address bug #2690 by bumping it from 5.2.0 to 5.2.3.
- Bump Microsoft.Data.SqlClient version in central package props.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
src/Directory.Packages.props:36
- The note above this line indicates that the license URL in
scripts/notice-generation.ps1should be updated when bumping Microsoft.Data.SqlClient. Please ensure that script is updated to reference the new 5.2.3 version.
<PackageVersion Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.2.3" />
1 task
Aniruddh25
reviewed
May 28, 2025
Aniruddh25
requested changes
May 28, 2025
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 6 pipeline(s). |
Aniruddh25
approved these changes
May 28, 2025
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Review In Progress
to Done
in Data API builder
RubenCerna2079
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2025
## Why make this change? This change solves the bug #2690 ## What is this change? We update the `Microsoft.Data.SqlClient` package from version 5.2.0 to version 5.2.3 in the `Directory.Packages.props` file. As the bug is a known error from the current version we are using. ## How was this tested? - [ ] Integration Tests - [ ] Unit Tests ## Sample Request(s) --------- Co-authored-by: Ruben Cerna <[email protected]>
2 tasks
RubenCerna2079
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2025
## Why make this change? This change solves the bug #2690 ## What is this change? We update the `Microsoft.Data.SqlClient` package from version 5.2.0 to version 5.2.3 in the `Directory.Packages.props` file. As the bug is a known error from the current version we are using. ## How was this tested? - [ ] Integration Tests - [ ] Unit Tests ## Sample Request(s) --------- Co-authored-by: Ruben Cerna <[email protected]>
aaronburtle
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2025
## Why make this change? This change is made in order to add all of the commits for milestone 1.5 into its respective branch. ## What is this change? This change cherry-picks all of the commits that were added after the first release candidate. Cherry-picked commits: - #2648 #2657 #2617 #2659 #2655 #2633 #2667 #2673 #2650 #2695 #2702 #2688 ## How was this tested? - [ ] Integration Tests - [ ] Unit Tests ## Sample Request(s) --------- Co-authored-by: Sezal Chug <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: sezalchug <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tommaso Stocchi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Aaron Powell <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: aaronburtle <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Aniruddh Munde <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jerry Nixon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Michael Staib <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: souvikghosh04 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Souvik Ghosh <[email protected]>
2 tasks
RubenCerna2079
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2025
## Why make this change? Need to update license agreement to old version in script. SqlClient.SNI does not have a new version the same way the SqlClient package does with 5.2.3. ## What is this change? This changes the name of the license agreement from 5.2.3 to 5.2.0. Related to PR #2702 ## How was this tested? - [ ] Integration Tests - [ ] Unit Tests ## Sample Request(s)
RubenCerna2079
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2025
## Why make this change? Need to update license agreement to old version in script. SqlClient.SNI does not have a new version the same way the SqlClient package does with 5.2.3. ## What is this change? This changes the name of the license agreement from 5.2.3 to 5.2.0. Related to PR #2702 ## How was this tested? - [ ] Integration Tests - [ ] Unit Tests ## Sample Request(s)
2 tasks
RubenCerna2079
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2025
…2.3 to 5.2.0 (#2706) ## Why make this change? Need to update license agreement to old version in script. SqlClient.SNI does not have a new version the same way the SqlClient package does with 5.2.3. ## What is this change? This changes the name of the license agreement from 5.2.3 to 5.2.0. Related to PR #2702 Cherry-picked PR: - #2705 ## How was this tested? - [ ] Integration Tests - [ ] Unit Tests ## Sample Request(s)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why make this change?
This change solves the bug #2690
What is this change?
We update the
Microsoft.Data.SqlClientpackage from version 5.2.0 to version 5.2.3 in theDirectory.Packages.propsfile. As the bug is a known error from the current version we are usingHow was this tested?
Sample Request(s)