Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency apache-beam to v2.31.0 #6274

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Jul 8, 2021

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
apache-beam ==2.30.0 -> ==2.31.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because other commits have been found.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 8, 2021 17:22
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the samples Issues that are directly related to samples. label Jul 8, 2021
@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. labels Jul 8, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jul 8, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labels Jul 8, 2021
@leahecole
Copy link
Collaborator

leahecole commented Jul 8, 2021

@davidcavazos is OOO this week but I think his #6096 PR might help with this

@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Jul 19, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Jul 19, 2021
@leahecole
Copy link
Collaborator

blocked by #6445

@leahecole leahecole added the status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. label Jul 20, 2021
@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 2, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 2, 2021
@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 2, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 2, 2021
@davidcavazos
Copy link
Contributor

Blocked by #6503

@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 9, 2021
@leahecole leahecole removed the status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. label Aug 9, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 9, 2021
@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 10, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 10, 2021
@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 10, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 10, 2021
@leahecole
Copy link
Collaborator

Hmm, @davidcavazos it now seems like gpu-workers is the troublesome one here. Any ideas as to what's going on? I don't see anything amiss in Dataflow in the console and our quotas seem to be fine

@davidcavazos
Copy link
Contributor

davidcavazos commented Aug 11, 2021

The gpu-workers sample is the old one, the new gpu-examples aren't having any problems. I have cl/390001804 updating the docs to use the new sample, and after that we can delete the older gpu-workers directory.

It was too much of a hassle updating the docs and updating the samples at the same time, so we made a phased approach. Once the CL is merged, we can delete that directory and hopefully we won't have any failing tests anymore :)

@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 13, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 13, 2021
@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 13, 2021
@kokoro-team kokoro-team removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Aug 13, 2021
@parthea parthea added the status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. label Aug 14, 2021
@parthea
Copy link
Collaborator

parthea commented Aug 14, 2021

Wait for #6563

gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2021
## Description

Fixes #6274, #6468

Remove the old `gpu-workers` sample, this has been replaced by the new [`gpu-examples/tensorflow-landsat`](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/python-docs-samples/tree/master/dataflow/gpu-examples/tensorflow-landsat) sample.

The [docs](https://cloud.google.com/dataflow/docs/samples/satellite-images-gpus) already point to the new sample as well, so it's safe to delete.

## Checklist
- [ ] I have followed [Sample Guidelines from AUTHORING_GUIDE.MD](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/python-docs-samples/blob/master/AUTHORING_GUIDE.md)
- [ ] README is updated to include [all relevant information](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/python-docs-samples/blob/master/AUTHORING_GUIDE.md#readme-file)
- [ ] **Tests** pass:   `nox -s py-3.6` (see [Test Environment Setup](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/python-docs-samples/blob/master/AUTHORING_GUIDE.md#test-environment-setup))
- [ ] **Lint** pass:   `nox -s lint` (see [Test Environment Setup](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/python-docs-samples/blob/master/AUTHORING_GUIDE.md#test-environment-setup))
- [ ] These samples need a new **API enabled** in testing projects to pass (let us know which ones)
- [ ] These samples need a new/updated **env vars** in testing projects set to pass (let us know which ones)
- [ ] Please **merge** this PR for me once it is approved.
- [ ] This sample adds a new sample directory, and I updated the [CODEOWNERS file](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/python-docs-samples/blob/master/.github/CODEOWNERS) with the codeowners for this sample
@forking-renovate
Copy link

Renovate Ignore Notification

As this PR has been closed unmerged, Renovate will now ignore this update (==2.31.0). You will still receive a PR once a newer version is released, so if you wish to permanently ignore this dependency, please add it to the ignoreDeps array of your renovate config.

If this PR was closed by mistake or you changed your mind, you can simply rename this PR and you will soon get a fresh replacement PR opened.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/apache-beam-2.x branch August 16, 2021 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. samples Issues that are directly related to samples. status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants