Modernize project layout

[jorgepiloto]

Resolves #296 by:

• Moving from setup.py to pyproject.toml.
• Collecting developer dependencies in a common requirements/ directory.
• Collect extra dependencies within pyproject.toml.
• Move tools configuration to pyproject.toml.
• Enable pre-commit for style checking.
• Updating .github/ workflows to new layout.
• Protection rules for branch "main" must point to new actions

[jorgepiloto]

I just noticed that scooby is used for reporting. Shouldn't we use ansys-report-tool? Pinging here @PProfizi for having feedback on this question. Also, pinging @RobPasMue, as he is the main maintainer of ansys-report-tool.

[jorgepiloto]

I just noticed that scooby is used for reporting. Shouldn't we use ansys-report-tool? Pinging here @PProfizi for having feedback on this question. Also, pinging @RobPasMue, as he is the main maintainer of ansys-report-tool.

Maybe the migration to ansys-tools-report can be made in a separate PR so this one does not get too complex.

[jorgepiloto]

Note: documentation is using the old PyAnsys logo.

[PProfizi]

I just noticed that scooby is used for reporting. Shouldn't we use ansys-report-tool? Pinging here @PProfizi for having feedback on this question. Also, pinging @RobPasMue, as he is the main maintainer of ansys-report-tool.

Maybe the migration to ansys-tools-report can be made in a separate PR so this one does not get too complex.

Hi @jorgepiloto, indeed this has been something to be done, a separate PR would be better.

[PProfizi]

Note: documentation is using the old PyAnsys logo.

Hi @jorgepiloto, this is being modified here

[RobPasMue]

I just noticed that scooby is used for reporting. Shouldn't we use ansys-report-tool? Pinging here @PProfizi for having feedback on this question. Also, pinging @RobPasMue, as he is the main maintainer of ansys-report-tool.

Maybe the migration to ansys-tools-report can be made in a separate PR so this one does not get too complex.

Hi @jorgepiloto, indeed this has been something to be done, a separate PR would be better.

Hi @jorgepiloto @PProfizi I can handle this in a new PR. Already done it for PyMAPDL :) See example: ansys/pymapdl#1215

[jorgepiloto]

I'm closing this after realizing that addressing so many changes in a single PR is going to be a drama for reviewers but also pretty complex to develop while other changes are being implemented.