DLPX-84906 Disable frame buffer drivers #26
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sumedhbala-delphix
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/sumedhbala-delphix/fef6f020-3cf8-4188-b169-1b8498b8cd39
branch
from
a0772a6 to
dc09f0f
Compare
prakashsurya
approved these changes
May 8, 2023
sebroy
approved these changes
May 9, 2023
sumedhbala-delphix
deleted the
dlpx/pr/sumedhbala-delphix/fef6f020-3cf8-4188-b169-1b8498b8cd39
branch
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2023
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2023
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032689 [ Upstream commit 8d21155 ] adjust_inuse_and_calc_cost() use spin_lock_irq() and IRQ will be enabled when unlock. DEADLOCK might happen if we have held other locks and disabled IRQ before invoking it. Fix it by using spin_lock_irqsave() instead, which can keep IRQ state consistent with before when unlock. ================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 5.10.0-02758-g8e5f91fd772f #26 Not tainted -------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. kworker/2:3/388 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: ffff888118c00c28 (&bfqd->lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_irq ffff888118c00c28 (&bfqd->lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: bfq_bio_merge+0x141/0x390 {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: __lock_acquire+0x3d7/0x1070 lock_acquire+0x197/0x4a0 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x60 bfq_idle_slice_timer_body bfq_idle_slice_timer+0x53/0x1d0 __run_hrtimer+0x477/0xa70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1c6/0x2d0 hrtimer_interrupt+0x302/0x9e0 local_apic_timer_interrupt __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xfd/0x420 run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x46/0xa0 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 irq event stamp: 837522 hardirqs last enabled at (837521): [<ffffffff84b9419d>] __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore hardirqs last enabled at (837521): [<ffffffff84b9419d>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3d/0x40 hardirqs last disabled at (837522): [<ffffffff84b93fa3>] __raw_spin_lock_irq hardirqs last disabled at (837522): [<ffffffff84b93fa3>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x43/0x50 softirqs last enabled at (835852): [<ffffffff84e00558>] __do_softirq+0x558/0x8ec softirqs last disabled at (835845): [<ffffffff84c010ff>] asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&bfqd->lock); <Interrupt> lock(&bfqd->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kworker/2:3/388: #0: ffff888107af0f38 ((wq_completion)kthrotld){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x742/0x13f0 #1: ffff8881176bfdd8 ((work_completion)(&td->dispatch_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x777/0x13f0 #2: ffff888118c00c28 (&bfqd->lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_irq #2: ffff888118c00c28 (&bfqd->lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: bfq_bio_merge+0x141/0x390 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 388 Comm: kworker/2:3 Not tainted 5.10.0-02758-g8e5f91fd772f #26 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: kthrotld blk_throtl_dispatch_work_fn Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x107/0x167 print_usage_bug valid_state mark_lock_irq.cold+0x32/0x3a mark_lock+0x693/0xbc0 mark_held_locks+0x9e/0xe0 __trace_hardirqs_on_caller lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x151/0x360 trace_hardirqs_on+0x5b/0x180 __raw_spin_unlock_irq _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40 spin_unlock_irq adjust_inuse_and_calc_cost+0x4fb/0x970 ioc_rqos_merge+0x277/0x740 __rq_qos_merge+0x62/0xb0 rq_qos_merge bio_attempt_back_merge+0x12c/0x4a0 blk_mq_sched_try_merge+0x1b6/0x4d0 bfq_bio_merge+0x24a/0x390 __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge+0xa6/0x460 blk_mq_sched_bio_merge blk_mq_submit_bio+0x2e7/0x1ee0 __submit_bio_noacct_mq+0x175/0x3b0 submit_bio_noacct+0x1fb/0x270 blk_throtl_dispatch_work_fn+0x1ef/0x2b0 process_one_work+0x83e/0x13f0 process_scheduled_works worker_thread+0x7e3/0xd80 kthread+0x353/0x470 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Fixes: b0853ab ("blk-iocost: revamp in-period donation snapbacks") Signed-off-by: Li Nan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2024
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
palash-gandhi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 26, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2025
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2025
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2025
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2025
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2025
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097298 commit 073d89808c065ac4c672c0a613a71b27a80691cb upstream. Syzkaller reported this warning: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #26 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 Code: 24 12 4c 89 e2 5b 48 c7 c7 98 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 d1 18 17 ff 4c 89 e6 5b 48 c7 c7 d0 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 bf 18 17 ff 0f 0b eb 83 <0f> 0b eb 97 0f 0b eb 87 0f 0b e9 68 ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000008bd90 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000300 RBX: ffff88810b172a90 RCX: 0000000000000007 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000300 RDI: ffff88810b172a00 RBP: ffff88810b172a00 R08: ffff888104273c00 R09: 0000000000100007 R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88810b172a00 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888237c31f78 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffc63fecac8 CR3: 000000000342e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x88/0x130 ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 ? report_bug+0x18e/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 __sk_destruct+0x2a/0x200 rcu_do_batch+0x1aa/0x530 ? rcu_do_batch+0x13b/0x530 rcu_core+0x159/0x2f0 handle_softirqs+0xd3/0x2b0 ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 run_ksoftirqd+0x25/0x30 smpboot_thread_fn+0xdd/0x1d0 kthread+0xd3/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Its possible that two threads call tcp_v6_do_rcv()/sk_forward_alloc_add() concurrently when sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN with sk->sk_lock unlocked, which triggers a data-race around sk->sk_forward_alloc: tcp_v6_rcv tcp_v6_do_rcv skb_clone_and_charge_r sk_rmem_schedule __sk_mem_schedule sk_forward_alloc_add() skb_set_owner_r sk_mem_charge sk_forward_alloc_add() __kfree_skb skb_release_all skb_release_head_state sock_rfree sk_mem_uncharge sk_forward_alloc_add() sk_mem_reclaim // set local var reclaimable __sk_mem_reclaim sk_forward_alloc_add() In this syzkaller testcase, two threads call tcp_v6_do_rcv() with skb->truesize=768, the sk_forward_alloc changes like this: (cpu 1) | (cpu 2) | sk_forward_alloc ... | ... | 0 __sk_mem_schedule() | | +4096 = 4096 | __sk_mem_schedule() | +4096 = 8192 sk_mem_charge() | | -768 = 7424 | sk_mem_charge() | -768 = 6656 ... | ... | sk_mem_uncharge() | | +768 = 7424 reclaimable=7424 | | | sk_mem_uncharge() | +768 = 8192 | reclaimable=8192 | __sk_mem_reclaim() | | -4096 = 4096 | __sk_mem_reclaim() | -8192 = -4096 != 0 The skb_clone_and_charge_r() should not be called in tcp_v6_do_rcv() when sk->sk_state is TCP_LISTEN, it happens later in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock(). Fix the same issue in dccp_v6_do_rcv(). Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Fixes: e994b2f ("tcp: do not lock listener to process SYN packets") Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alva Lan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cherry pick of https://www.github.com/delphix/linux-kernel-aws/pull/36