Skip to content

DLPX-89481 resolve merge conflict with GCP kernel (5.15.0-1048.56_20.04.1) #34

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
0 commits merged into from
Jan 16, 2024
Merged

DLPX-89481 resolve merge conflict with GCP kernel (5.15.0-1048.56_20.04.1) #34

0 commits merged into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

ahrens
Copy link

@ahrens ahrens commented Jan 16, 2024

same issue and fix as #33 - remove the lines from debian/dkms-versions

The commands I ran to generate this, which seemed to correspond with the failed auto-merge run:

git checkout -b merge origin/develop
git reset --hard origin/upstreams/develop
git cherry-pick a775e25d26bce491747d82de492f08b126656e47^..e79fd792371c223d0014d7d1ce2216b224df2e6e
git push origin HEAD:projects/merge-upstream

How should this be tested?

@ahrens ahrens requested a review from prakashsurya January 16, 2024 04:48
@prakashsurya
Copy link

How should this be tested?

ab-pre-push runs automatically, as a PR check, and that passed, so we're good.

@ahrens ahrens closed this pull request by merging all changes into develop in 9516666 Jan 16, 2024
@ahrens ahrens deleted the projects/merge-upstream branch January 16, 2024 19:23
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2024
@Jie1zhang @smb49
drm/amdkfd: Fix shift out-of-bounds issue
a45b6be 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2050038

[ Upstream commit 282c1d7 ]

[  567.613292] shift exponent 255 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
[  567.614498] CPU: 5 PID: 238 Comm: kworker/5:1 Tainted: G           OE      6.2.0-34-generic #34~22.04.1-Ubuntu
[  567.614502] Hardware name: AMD Splinter/Splinter-RPL, BIOS WS43927N_871 09/25/2023
[  567.614504] Workqueue: events send_exception_work_handler [amdgpu]
[  567.614748] Call Trace:
[  567.614750]  <TASK>
[  567.614753]  dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x70
[  567.614761]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[  567.614763]  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x156/0x310
[  567.614769]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
[  567.614773]  ? update_sd_lb_stats.constprop.0+0xf2/0x3c0
[  567.614780]  svm_range_split_by_granularity.cold+0x2b/0x34 [amdgpu]
[  567.615047]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
[  567.615052]  svm_migrate_to_ram+0x185/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  567.615286]  do_swap_page+0x7b6/0xa30
[  567.615291]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
[  567.615294]  ? __free_pages+0x119/0x130
[  567.615299]  handle_pte_fault+0x227/0x280
[  567.615303]  __handle_mm_fault+0x3c0/0x720
[  567.615311]  handle_mm_fault+0x119/0x330
[  567.615314]  ? lock_mm_and_find_vma+0x44/0x250
[  567.615318]  do_user_addr_fault+0x1a9/0x640
[  567.615323]  exc_page_fault+0x81/0x1b0
[  567.615328]  asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
[  567.615332] RIP: 0010:__get_user_8+0x1c/0x30

Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Philip Yang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yifan Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
@pchelkin91 @smb49
ipvs: avoid stat macros calls from preemptible context
0cc9cac 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055145

[ Upstream commit d6938c1 ]

Inside decrement_ttl() upon discovering that the packet ttl has exceeded,
__IP_INC_STATS and __IP6_INC_STATS macros can be called from preemptible
context having the following backtrace:

check_preemption_disabled: 48 callbacks suppressed
BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: curl/1177
caller is decrement_ttl+0x217/0x830
CPU: 5 PID: 1177 Comm: curl Not tainted 6.7.0+ #34
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbd/0xe0
 check_preemption_disabled+0xd1/0xe0
 decrement_ttl+0x217/0x830
 __ip_vs_get_out_rt+0x4e0/0x1ef0
 ip_vs_nat_xmit+0x205/0xcd0
 ip_vs_in_hook+0x9b1/0x26a0
 nf_hook_slow+0xc2/0x210
 nf_hook+0x1fb/0x770
 __ip_local_out+0x33b/0x640
 ip_local_out+0x2a/0x490
 __ip_queue_xmit+0x990/0x1d10
 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x288b/0x3d10
 tcp_connect+0x3466/0x5180
 tcp_v4_connect+0x1535/0x1bb0
 __inet_stream_connect+0x40d/0x1040
 inet_stream_connect+0x57/0xa0
 __sys_connect_file+0x162/0x1a0
 __sys_connect+0x137/0x160
 __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
RIP: 0033:0x7fe6dbbc34e0

Use the corresponding preemption-aware variants: IP_INC_STATS and
IP6_INC_STATS.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).

Fixes: 8d8e20e ("ipvs: Decrement ttl")
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2024
@j-c-h @smb49
l2tp: fix lockdep splat
0f3eac1 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078428

[ Upstream commit 86a41ea ]

When l2tp tunnels use a socket provided by userspace, we can hit
lockdep splats like the below when data is transmitted through another
(unrelated) userspace socket which then gets routed over l2tp.

This issue was previously discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/

The solution is to have lockdep treat socket locks of l2tp tunnel
sockets separately than those of standard INET sockets. To do so, use
a different lockdep subclass where lock nesting is possible.

  ============================================
  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  6.10.0+ #34 Not tainted
  --------------------------------------------
  iperf3/771 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8881027601d8 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(slock-AF_INET/1);
    lock(slock-AF_INET/1);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  10 locks held by iperf3/771:
   #0: ffff888102650258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x1a/0x40
   #1: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0
   #2: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130
   #3: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   #4: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0xf9/0x260
   #5: ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10
   #6: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0
   #7: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130
   #8: ffffffff822ac1e0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0xcc/0x1450
   #9: ffff888101f33258 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock#2){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x513/0x1450

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 771 Comm: iperf3 Not tainted 6.10.0+ #34
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x69/0xa0
   dump_stack+0xc/0x20
   __lock_acquire+0x135d/0x2600
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2a0
   ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   ? __skb_checksum+0xa3/0x540
   _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x35/0x50
   ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0
   l2tp_eth_dev_xmit+0x3c/0xc0
   dev_hard_start_xmit+0x11e/0x420
   sch_direct_xmit+0xc3/0x640
   __dev_queue_xmit+0x61c/0x1450
   ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130
   ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ip_output+0x99/0x120
   __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0
   ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40
   __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890
   __tcp_send_ack+0x1b8/0x340
   tcp_send_ack+0x23/0x30
   __tcp_ack_snd_check+0xa8/0x530
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   tcp_rcv_established+0x412/0xd70
   tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x299/0x420
   tcp_v4_rcv+0x1991/0x1e10
   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x50/0x220
   ip_local_deliver_finish+0x158/0x260
   ip_local_deliver+0xc8/0xe0
   ip_rcv+0xe5/0x1d0
   ? __pfx_ip_rcv+0x10/0x10
   __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xce/0xe0
   ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   __netif_receive_skb+0x34/0xd0
   ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0
   process_backlog+0x2cb/0x9f0
   __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x61/0x280
   net_rx_action+0x332/0x670
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   handle_softirqs+0xda/0x480
   ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450
   do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0
   </IRQ>
   <TASK>
   __local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xe0
   ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450
   __dev_queue_xmit+0xa48/0x1450
   ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130
   ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380
   ip_output+0x99/0x120
   __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0
   ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40
   __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890
   tcp_write_xmit+0x766/0x2fb0
   ? __entry_text_end+0x102ba9/0x102bad
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   ? __might_fault+0x74/0xc0
   ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
   __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x190
   tcp_push+0x117/0x310
   tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x14c1/0x1740
   tcp_sendmsg+0x28/0x40
   inet_sendmsg+0x5d/0x90
   sock_write_iter+0x242/0x2b0
   vfs_write+0x68d/0x800
   ? __pfx_sock_write_iter+0x10/0x10
   ksys_write+0xc8/0xf0
   __x64_sys_write+0x3d/0x50
   x64_sys_call+0xfaf/0x1f50
   do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
  RIP: 0033:0x7f4d143af992
  Code: c3 8b 07 85 c0 75 24 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 89 5c 24 08 0f 05 <c3> e9 01 cc ff ff 41 54 b8 02 00 00 0
  RSP: 002b:00007ffd65032058 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f4d143af992
  RDX: 0000000000000025 RSI: 00007f4d143f3bcc RDI: 0000000000000005
  RBP: 00007f4d143f2b28 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f4d143f3bcc
  R13: 0000000000000005 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd650323f0
   </TASK>

Fixes: 0b2c597 ("l2tp: close all race conditions in l2tp_tunnel_register()")
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6acef9e0a4d1f46c83d4
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: James Chapman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tom Parkin <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@prakashsurya prakashsurya prakashsurya approved these changes

@sebroy sebroy sebroy approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@ahrens @prakashsurya @sebroy