Backport minimal action API changes to 6.0-rc1 #35632
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pranavkm
requested review from
BrennanConroy,
javiercn,
Pilchie,
Tratcher and
a team
as code owners
pranavkm
force-pushed
the
prkrishn/backport
branch
from
46093cd to
b5d316b
Compare
|
The auth change is failing. |
pranavkm
force-pushed
the
prkrishn/backport
branch
from
b5d316b to
48dcb4a
Compare
10 tasks
|
This PR is ready to be merged. |
ghost
added this to the 
|
Done. |
Pilchie
added
the
old-area-web-frameworks-do-not-use
10 tasks
This was referenced Aug 24, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
As part of our feature review, we decided we wanted to avoid using the term minimal actions in code. The changes in this PR appear as part of types containing extension methods, and method parameter names, i.e. not high user impact, but we'd like to clean it up before 6.0 ships.
In addition, based on preview 7 user feedback, we're adding an API for 3rd party libraries to register an extensibility to minimal actions. The feature request came in late as libraries have only recently started experimenting with minimal actions.
Regression?
Risk
We have tests for these changes and no packaging changes are involved.
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?