Skip to content

Highlights FORALL statements as errors #90

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
chris-revell opened this issue Dec 2, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Highlights FORALL statements as errors #90

chris-revell opened this issue Dec 2, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@chris-revell
Copy link

screen shot 2016-12-02 at 12 13 29

@tomedunn
Copy link
Contributor

tomedunn commented Dec 2, 2016

Thanks for posting this!

I'll try to modify the rules to allow for forall statements later today. It should be possible given I was able to do the same thing for if statements.

@chris-revell
Copy link
Author

Great. I'd do it myself but have no experience changing syntax packages.

@tomedunn
Copy link
Contributor

tomedunn commented Dec 2, 2016

From experience, implementing this particular fix would be a really difficult one to tackle as your first try at modifying this syntax package. Thankfully the trick to making it work is already implemented in the rules for the where statement and construct. So it should just be a matter of copying the rules for that and modifying them to work for forall instead.

@chris-revell
Copy link
Author

Great work fixing that so quickly. I'll wait for the update to come through Atom.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants