-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 710
Move process >= 1.16.4
constraint from Cabal-3.8.1.0
to cabal-install-3.8.1.0
#8802
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e239a9f
3.8.1.0 existing revisions (already on Hackage)
andreasabel 426bf07
Changes for compilation under GHC 9.4 (not for release)
andreasabel 2beee0b
Proposed revision 1: Cabal-3.8.1.0: allow mtl-2.3/transformers-0.6
andreasabel aa60929
Proposed revision 2: move process constraint from Cabal to cabal-install
andreasabel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ common shared | |
default-language: Haskell2010 | ||
|
||
build-depends: | ||
, base >= 4.6 && <4.17 | ||
, base >= 4.6 && <4.18 | ||
-- this needs to match the in-tree lib:Cabal version | ||
, Cabal ^>=3.8.0.0 | ||
, Cabal-syntax ^>=3.8.0.0 | ||
, Cabal ^>=3.8.1.0 | ||
, Cabal-syntax ^>=3.8.1.0 | ||
Comment on lines
+31
to
+32
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We actually keep these, and everywhere else, at X.X.0.0 to avoid having to update at each minor release. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Okay! |
||
|
||
ghc-options: -Wall -fwarn-tabs -fwarn-incomplete-uni-patterns | ||
|
||
|
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ library | |
Test.Cabal.ScriptEnv0 | ||
|
||
build-depends: | ||
, aeson ^>= 1.4.2.0 || ^>=1.5.0.0 || ^>= 2.0.0.0 | ||
, aeson ^>= 1.4.2.0 || ^>=1.5.0.0 || ^>= 2.0.0.0 || ^>= 2.1.0.0 | ||
, async ^>= 2.2.1 | ||
, attoparsec ^>= 0.13.2.2 || ^>=0.14.1 | ||
, base16-bytestring ^>= 0.1.1.6 || ^>= 1.0.0.0 | ||
|
@@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ library | |
, directory ^>= 1.2.0.1 || ^>= 1.3.0.0 | ||
, exceptions ^>= 0.10.0 | ||
, filepath ^>= 1.3.0.1 || ^>= 1.4.0.0 | ||
, network-wait ^>= 0.1.2.0 | ||
, optparse-applicative ^>= 0.14.3.0 || ^>=0.15.1.0 || ^>=0.16.0.0 | ||
, network-wait >= 0.1.2.0 && < 0.3 | ||
, optparse-applicative ^>= 0.14.3.0 || ^>=0.15.1.0 || ^>=0.16.0.0 || ^>=0.17.0.0 | ||
, process ^>= 1.2.1.0 || ^>= 1.4.2.0 || ^>= 1.6.1.0 | ||
, regex-base ^>= 0.94.0.1 | ||
, regex-tdfa ^>= 1.2.3.1 || ^>=1.3.1.0 | ||
|
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ library | |
|
||
if !os(windows) | ||
build-depends: | ||
, unix ^>= 2.6.0.0 || ^>= 2.7.0.0 | ||
, unix ^>= 2.6.0.0 || ^>= 2.7.0.0 || ^>= 2.8.0.0 | ||
else | ||
build-depends: | ||
, Win32 | ||
|
@@ -113,6 +113,6 @@ custom-setup | |
-- we only depend on even stable releases of lib:Cabal | ||
-- and due to Custom complexity and ConstraintSetupCabalMaxVersion | ||
-- it can't be the current version | ||
setup-depends: Cabal == 3.6.*, | ||
Cabal-syntax == 3.6.*, | ||
setup-depends: Cabal == 3.8.*, | ||
Cabal-syntax == 3.8.*, | ||
base, filepath, directory |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't remember --- was this tested with 3.8 (as opposed to with master)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made this revision 2022-08-30. I strongly suspect that I did test it before revising.
But even if I hadn't, it has now passed the test of time. ;-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hah, it did. But if so, I bet we tested it on 3.8 (or master before 3.8 has been cut).