-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success. #8349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
A: experiments
Related to dvc exp
Comments
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
2 tasks
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
2 tasks
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
karajan1001
added a commit
to karajan1001/dvc
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2022
fix: iterative#8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
karajan1001
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2022
fix: #8349 `tasks status turned to queued for 1 second before turned into success.` is because in previous the status is using the output of `get_running_exps` in `repo.expereiments` and when entering the collect result progress, the `get_running_exps` will mark the tasks to be not running because the `info.result` is not None. Here we use the output of the celery queue as the universal standard for the tasks status. 1. Use celery status as the exp show status
Repository owner
moved this from Review In Progress
to Done
in DVC
Oct 24, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Originally posted by @karajan1001 in #8158 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: