-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
bpf: Simplify check in btf_parse_hdr() #182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Master branch: 9492450 |
Master branch: a8fee96 |
d318da7
to
84fcb47
Compare
Master branch: 46e9244 |
84fcb47
to
8a89668
Compare
Master branch: ef07860 |
8a89668
to
ef3c367
Compare
Master branch: 7ada378 |
ef3c367
to
d1624fd
Compare
Master branch: ec80906 |
d1624fd
to
f8058f3
Compare
Master branch: f709869 |
f8058f3
to
eb95825
Compare
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=624942 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
Add a big batch of selftest to extend test_progs with various tc link, attach ops and old-style tc BPF attachments via libbpf APIs. Also test multi-program attachments including mixing the various attach options: # ./test_progs -t tc_link #179 tc_link_base:OK #180 tc_link_detach:OK #181 tc_link_mix:OK #182 tc_link_opts:OK #183 tc_link_run_base:OK #184 tc_link_run_chain:OK Summary: 6/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED All new and existing test cases pass. Co-developed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Somehow recently I frequently hit the following test failure with either ./test_progs or ./test_progs-cpuv4: serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:lsm_attach 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:raw_tp_attach 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:FAIL:cmp_tp_name unexpected cmp_tp_name: actual -115 != expected 0 #182 ptr_untrusted:FAIL Further investigation found the failure is due to bpf_probe_read_user_str() where reading user-level string attr->raw_tracepoint.name is not successfully, most likely due to the string itself still in disk and not populated into memory yet. One solution is do a printf() call of the string before doing bpf syscall which will force the raw_tracepoint.name into memory. But I think a more robust solution is to use bpf_copy_from_user() which is used in sleepable program and can tolerate page fault, and the fix here used the latter approach. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Somehow recently I frequently hit the following test failure with either ./test_progs or ./test_progs-cpuv4: serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:lsm_attach 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:raw_tp_attach 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:FAIL:cmp_tp_name unexpected cmp_tp_name: actual -115 != expected 0 #182 ptr_untrusted:FAIL Further investigation found the failure is due to bpf_probe_read_user_str() where reading user-level string attr->raw_tracepoint.name is not successfully, most likely due to the string itself still in disk and not populated into memory yet. One solution is do a printf() call of the string before doing bpf syscall which will force the raw_tracepoint.name into memory. But I think a more robust solution is to use bpf_copy_from_user() which is used in sleepable program and can tolerate page fault, and the fix here used the latter approach. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Somehow recently I frequently hit the following test failure with either ./test_progs or ./test_progs-cpuv4: serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:lsm_attach 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:raw_tp_attach 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:FAIL:cmp_tp_name unexpected cmp_tp_name: actual -115 != expected 0 #182 ptr_untrusted:FAIL Further investigation found the failure is due to bpf_probe_read_user_str() where reading user-level string attr->raw_tracepoint.name is not successfully, most likely due to the string itself still in disk and not populated into memory yet. One solution is do a printf() call of the string before doing bpf syscall which will force the raw_tracepoint.name into memory. But I think a more robust solution is to use bpf_copy_from_user() which is used in sleepable program and can tolerate page fault, and the fix here used the latter approach. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Commit 8284066 ("ublk: grab request reference when the request is handled by userspace") doesn't grab request reference in case of recovery reissue. Then the request can be requeued & re-dispatch & failed when canceling uring command. If it is one zc request, the request can be freed before io_uring returns the zc buffer back, then cause kernel panic: [ 126.773061] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c8 [ 126.773657] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 126.774052] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 126.774455] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 126.774698] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 126.775034] CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 1612 Comm: kworker/u64:55 Not tainted 6.14.0_blk+ #182 PREEMPT(full) [ 126.775676] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 [ 126.776275] Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work [ 126.776651] RIP: 0010:ublk_io_release+0x14/0x130 [ublk_drv] Fixes it by always grabbing request reference for aborting the request. Reported-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/CADUfDZodKfOGUeWrnAxcZiLT+puaZX8jDHoj_sfHZCOZwhzz6A@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 8284066 ("ublk: grab request reference when the request is handled by userspace") Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: Simplify check in btf_parse_hdr()
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=624942