Skip to content

Add btf__field_exists #247

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add btf__field_exists #247

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: Add btf__field_exists
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=628674

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 0a210af
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=628674
version: 1

Pull request is NOT updated. Failed to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=628674
error message:

Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128)
  cmdline: git am -3
  stdout: 'Applying: libbpf: Add userspace version of for_each_member macro
Applying: libbpf: Add btf__field_exists
Patch failed at 0002 libbpf: Add btf__field_exists
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".'
  stderr: 'error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (tools/lib/bpf/btf.h).
error: could not build fake ancestor
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch'

conflict:

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=628674 expired. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/628674=>bpf branch April 6, 2022 18:10
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
4e5cfb3 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #237     tc_opts_after:OK
  #238     tc_opts_append:OK
  #239     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #240     tc_opts_before:OK
  #241     tc_opts_both:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_first:OK
  #249     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #250     tc_opts_last:OK
  #251     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #252     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #253     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #254     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
a9725a5 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #237     tc_opts_after:OK
  #238     tc_opts_append:OK
  #239     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #240     tc_opts_before:OK
  #241     tc_opts_both:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_first:OK
  #249     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #250     tc_opts_last:OK
  #251     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #252     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #253     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #254     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
e85e2b8 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
4fc9863 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
5a9375a 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
d33fa75 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
3aeb24e 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
4cf649d 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
226dac7 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
1adab75 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
e0c9eb0 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
d07c794 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
99050c4 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
f6a560b 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
0e74f6b 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
02ef656 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add mprog API tests for BPF tcx opts
cd13c91 
Add a big batch of test coverage to assert all aspects of the tcx opts
attach, detach and query API:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  #238     tc_opts_after:OK
  #239     tc_opts_append:OK
  #240     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #241     tc_opts_before:OK
  #242     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #243     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #244     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #245     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #246     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #247     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #248     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #249     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #250     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #251     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #252     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 15/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add test for detachment on empty mprog entry
cb3982e 
Add a detachment test case with miniq present to assert that with and
without the miniq we get the same error.

  # ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  #244     tc_opts_after:OK
  #245     tc_opts_append:OK
  #246     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #247     tc_opts_before:OK
  #248     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #249     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #250     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #251     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #252     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #254     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #255     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #256     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #257     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #258     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #259     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 16/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add test for detachment on empty mprog entry
21ce6ab 
Add a detachment test case with miniq present to assert that with and
without the miniq we get the same error.

  # ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  #244     tc_opts_after:OK
  #245     tc_opts_append:OK
  #246     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #247     tc_opts_before:OK
  #248     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #249     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #250     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #251     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #252     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #254     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #255     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #256     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #257     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #258     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #259     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 16/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add various more tcx test cases
74d3503 
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes
a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from
commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free").

  # ./test_progs -t tc
  [...]
  #234     tc_links_after:OK
  #235     tc_links_append:OK
  #236     tc_links_basic:OK
  #237     tc_links_before:OK
  #238     tc_links_chain_classic:OK
  #239     tc_links_chain_mixed:OK
  #240     tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK
  #241     tc_links_dev_mixed:OK
  #242     tc_links_ingress:OK
  #243     tc_links_invalid:OK
  #244     tc_links_prepend:OK
  #245     tc_links_replace:OK
  #246     tc_links_revision:OK
  #247     tc_opts_after:OK
  #248     tc_opts_append:OK
  #249     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #250     tc_opts_before:OK
  #251     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #252     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #253     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #254     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #255     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #256     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #257     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #258     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #259     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #260     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #261     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #262     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #263     tc_opts_revision:OK
  [...]
  Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add various more tcx test cases
7d793c6 
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes
a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from
commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free").

  # ./test_progs -t tc
  [...]
  #234     tc_links_after:OK
  #235     tc_links_append:OK
  #236     tc_links_basic:OK
  #237     tc_links_before:OK
  #238     tc_links_chain_classic:OK
  #239     tc_links_chain_mixed:OK
  #240     tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK
  #241     tc_links_dev_mixed:OK
  #242     tc_links_ingress:OK
  #243     tc_links_invalid:OK
  #244     tc_links_prepend:OK
  #245     tc_links_replace:OK
  #246     tc_links_revision:OK
  #247     tc_opts_after:OK
  #248     tc_opts_append:OK
  #249     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #250     tc_opts_before:OK
  #251     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #252     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #253     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #254     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #255     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #256     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #257     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #258     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #259     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #260     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #261     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #262     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #263     tc_opts_revision:OK
  [...]
  Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Add various more tcx test cases
ccd9a8b 
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes
a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from
commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free").

  # ./test_progs -t tc
  [...]
  #234     tc_links_after:OK
  #235     tc_links_append:OK
  #236     tc_links_basic:OK
  #237     tc_links_before:OK
  #238     tc_links_chain_classic:OK
  #239     tc_links_chain_mixed:OK
  #240     tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK
  #241     tc_links_dev_mixed:OK
  #242     tc_links_ingress:OK
  #243     tc_links_invalid:OK
  #244     tc_links_prepend:OK
  #245     tc_links_replace:OK
  #246     tc_links_revision:OK
  #247     tc_opts_after:OK
  #248     tc_opts_append:OK
  #249     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #250     tc_opts_before:OK
  #251     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #252     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #253     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #254     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #255     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #256     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #257     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #258     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #259     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #260     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #261     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #262     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #263     tc_opts_revision:OK
  [...]
  Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8699efc284b75ccdc51ddf7062fa2370330dc6c0.1692029283.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
bpf: bpf_sk_storage: Fix invalid wait context lockdep report
8adb167 
'./test_progs -t test_local_storage' reported a splat:
[   27.137569] =============================
[   27.138122] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[   27.138650] 6.5.0-03980-gd11ae1b16b0a #247 Tainted: G           O
[   27.139542] -----------------------------
[   27.140106] test_progs/1729 is trying to lock:
[   27.140713] ffff8883ef047b88 (stock_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: local_lock_acquire+0x9/0x130
[   27.141834] other info that might help us debug this:
[   27.142437] context-{5:5}
[   27.142856] 2 locks held by test_progs/1729:
[   27.143352]  #0: ffffffff84bcd9c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x4/0x40
[   27.144492]  #1: ffff888107deb2c0 (&storage->lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: bpf_local_storage_update+0x39e/0x8e0
[   27.145855] stack backtrace:
[   27.146274] CPU: 0 PID: 1729 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G           O       6.5.0-03980-gd11ae1b16b0a #247
[   27.147550] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[   27.149127] Call Trace:
[   27.149490]  <TASK>
[   27.149867]  dump_stack_lvl+0x130/0x1d0
[   27.152609]  dump_stack+0x14/0x20
[   27.153131]  __lock_acquire+0x1657/0x2220
[   27.153677]  lock_acquire+0x1b8/0x510
[   27.157908]  local_lock_acquire+0x29/0x130
[   27.159048]  obj_cgroup_charge+0xf4/0x3c0
[   27.160794]  slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x28e/0x2b0
[   27.161931]  __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x51/0x210
[   27.163557]  __kmalloc+0xaa/0x210
[   27.164593]  bpf_map_kzalloc+0xbc/0x170
[   27.165147]  bpf_selem_alloc+0x130/0x510
[   27.166295]  bpf_local_storage_update+0x5aa/0x8e0
[   27.167042]  bpf_fd_sk_storage_update_elem+0xdb/0x1a0
[   27.169199]  bpf_map_update_value+0x415/0x4f0
[   27.169871]  map_update_elem+0x413/0x550
[   27.170330]  __sys_bpf+0x5e9/0x640
[   27.174065]  __x64_sys_bpf+0x80/0x90
[   27.174568]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0xa0
[   27.175201]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
[   27.175932] RIP: 0033:0x7effb40e41ad
[   27.176357] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d8
[   27.179028] RSP: 002b:00007ffe64c21fc8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
[   27.180088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe64c22768 RCX: 00007effb40e41ad
[   27.181082] RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 00007ffe64c22008 RDI: 0000000000000002
[   27.182030] RBP: 00007ffe64c21ff0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe64c22788
[   27.183038] R10: 0000000000000064 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
[   27.184006] R13: 00007ffe64c22788 R14: 00007effb42a1000 R15: 0000000000000000
[   27.184958]  </TASK>

It complains about acquiring a local_lock while holding a raw_spin_lock.
It means it should not allocate memory while holding a raw_spin_lock
since it is not safe for RT.

raw_spin_lock is needed because bpf_local_storage supports tracing
context. In particular for task local storage, it is easy to
get a "current" task PTR_TO_BTF_ID in tracing bpf prog.
However, task (and cgroup) local storage has already been moved to
bpf mem allocator which can be used after raw_spin_lock.

The splat is for the sk storage. For sk (and inode) storage,
it has not been moved to bpf mem allocator. Using raw_spin_lock or not,
kzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) could theoretically be unsafe in tracing context.
However, the local storage helper requires a verifier accepted
sk pointer (PTR_TO_BTF_ID), it is hypothetical if that (mean running
a bpf prog in a kzalloc unsafe context and also able to hold a verifier
accepted sk pointer) could happen.

This patch avoids kzalloc after raw_spin_lock to silent the splat.
There is an existing kzalloc before the raw_spin_lock. At that point,
a kzalloc is very likely required because a lookup has just been done
before. Thus, this patch always does the kzalloc before acquiring
the raw_spin_lock and remove the later kzalloc usage after the
raw_spin_lock. After this change, it will have a charge and then
uncharge during the syscall bpf_map_update_elem() code path.
This patch opts for simplicity and not continue the old
optimization to save one charge and uncharge.

This issue is dated back to the very first commit of bpf_sk_storage
which had been refactored multiple times to create task, inode, and
cgroup storage. This patch uses a Fixes tag with a more recent
commit that should be easier to do backport.

Fixes: b00fa38 ("bpf: Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
bpf: bpf_sk_storage: Fix invalid wait context lockdep report
cf9c886 
'./test_progs -t test_local_storage' reported a splat:
[   27.137569] =============================
[   27.138122] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[   27.138650] 6.5.0-03980-gd11ae1b16b0a #247 Tainted: G           O
[   27.139542] -----------------------------
[   27.140106] test_progs/1729 is trying to lock:
[   27.140713] ffff8883ef047b88 (stock_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: local_lock_acquire+0x9/0x130
[   27.141834] other info that might help us debug this:
[   27.142437] context-{5:5}
[   27.142856] 2 locks held by test_progs/1729:
[   27.143352]  #0: ffffffff84bcd9c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x4/0x40
[   27.144492]  #1: ffff888107deb2c0 (&storage->lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: bpf_local_storage_update+0x39e/0x8e0
[   27.145855] stack backtrace:
[   27.146274] CPU: 0 PID: 1729 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G           O       6.5.0-03980-gd11ae1b16b0a #247
[   27.147550] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[   27.149127] Call Trace:
[   27.149490]  <TASK>
[   27.149867]  dump_stack_lvl+0x130/0x1d0
[   27.152609]  dump_stack+0x14/0x20
[   27.153131]  __lock_acquire+0x1657/0x2220
[   27.153677]  lock_acquire+0x1b8/0x510
[   27.157908]  local_lock_acquire+0x29/0x130
[   27.159048]  obj_cgroup_charge+0xf4/0x3c0
[   27.160794]  slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x28e/0x2b0
[   27.161931]  __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x51/0x210
[   27.163557]  __kmalloc+0xaa/0x210
[   27.164593]  bpf_map_kzalloc+0xbc/0x170
[   27.165147]  bpf_selem_alloc+0x130/0x510
[   27.166295]  bpf_local_storage_update+0x5aa/0x8e0
[   27.167042]  bpf_fd_sk_storage_update_elem+0xdb/0x1a0
[   27.169199]  bpf_map_update_value+0x415/0x4f0
[   27.169871]  map_update_elem+0x413/0x550
[   27.170330]  __sys_bpf+0x5e9/0x640
[   27.174065]  __x64_sys_bpf+0x80/0x90
[   27.174568]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0xa0
[   27.175201]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
[   27.175932] RIP: 0033:0x7effb40e41ad
[   27.176357] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d8
[   27.179028] RSP: 002b:00007ffe64c21fc8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
[   27.180088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe64c22768 RCX: 00007effb40e41ad
[   27.181082] RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 00007ffe64c22008 RDI: 0000000000000002
[   27.182030] RBP: 00007ffe64c21ff0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe64c22788
[   27.183038] R10: 0000000000000064 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
[   27.184006] R13: 00007ffe64c22788 R14: 00007effb42a1000 R15: 0000000000000000
[   27.184958]  </TASK>

It complains about acquiring a local_lock while holding a raw_spin_lock.
It means it should not allocate memory while holding a raw_spin_lock
since it is not safe for RT.

raw_spin_lock is needed because bpf_local_storage supports tracing
context. In particular for task local storage, it is easy to
get a "current" task PTR_TO_BTF_ID in tracing bpf prog.
However, task (and cgroup) local storage has already been moved to
bpf mem allocator which can be used after raw_spin_lock.

The splat is for the sk storage. For sk (and inode) storage,
it has not been moved to bpf mem allocator. Using raw_spin_lock or not,
kzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) could theoretically be unsafe in tracing context.
However, the local storage helper requires a verifier accepted
sk pointer (PTR_TO_BTF_ID), it is hypothetical if that (mean running
a bpf prog in a kzalloc unsafe context and also able to hold a verifier
accepted sk pointer) could happen.

This patch avoids kzalloc after raw_spin_lock to silent the splat.
There is an existing kzalloc before the raw_spin_lock. At that point,
a kzalloc is very likely required because a lookup has just been done
before. Thus, this patch always does the kzalloc before acquiring
the raw_spin_lock and remove the later kzalloc usage after the
raw_spin_lock. After this change, it will have a charge and then
uncharge during the syscall bpf_map_update_elem() code path.
This patch opts for simplicity and not continue the old
optimization to save one charge and uncharge.

This issue is dated back to the very first commit of bpf_sk_storage
which had been refactored multiple times to create task, inode, and
cgroup storage. This patch uses a Fixes tag with a more recent
commit that should be easier to do backport.

Fixes: b00fa38 ("bpf: Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
bpf: bpf_sk_storage: Fix invalid wait context lockdep report
7b5ce9c 
'./test_progs -t test_local_storage' reported a splat:
[   27.137569] =============================
[   27.138122] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[   27.138650] 6.5.0-03980-gd11ae1b16b0a #247 Tainted: G           O
[   27.139542] -----------------------------
[   27.140106] test_progs/1729 is trying to lock:
[   27.140713] ffff8883ef047b88 (stock_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: local_lock_acquire+0x9/0x130
[   27.141834] other info that might help us debug this:
[   27.142437] context-{5:5}
[   27.142856] 2 locks held by test_progs/1729:
[   27.143352]  #0: ffffffff84bcd9c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x4/0x40
[   27.144492]  #1: ffff888107deb2c0 (&storage->lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: bpf_local_storage_update+0x39e/0x8e0
[   27.145855] stack backtrace:
[   27.146274] CPU: 0 PID: 1729 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G           O       6.5.0-03980-gd11ae1b16b0a #247
[   27.147550] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[   27.149127] Call Trace:
[   27.149490]  <TASK>
[   27.149867]  dump_stack_lvl+0x130/0x1d0
[   27.152609]  dump_stack+0x14/0x20
[   27.153131]  __lock_acquire+0x1657/0x2220
[   27.153677]  lock_acquire+0x1b8/0x510
[   27.157908]  local_lock_acquire+0x29/0x130
[   27.159048]  obj_cgroup_charge+0xf4/0x3c0
[   27.160794]  slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x28e/0x2b0
[   27.161931]  __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x51/0x210
[   27.163557]  __kmalloc+0xaa/0x210
[   27.164593]  bpf_map_kzalloc+0xbc/0x170
[   27.165147]  bpf_selem_alloc+0x130/0x510
[   27.166295]  bpf_local_storage_update+0x5aa/0x8e0
[   27.167042]  bpf_fd_sk_storage_update_elem+0xdb/0x1a0
[   27.169199]  bpf_map_update_value+0x415/0x4f0
[   27.169871]  map_update_elem+0x413/0x550
[   27.170330]  __sys_bpf+0x5e9/0x640
[   27.174065]  __x64_sys_bpf+0x80/0x90
[   27.174568]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0xa0
[   27.175201]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
[   27.175932] RIP: 0033:0x7effb40e41ad
[   27.176357] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d8
[   27.179028] RSP: 002b:00007ffe64c21fc8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
[   27.180088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe64c22768 RCX: 00007effb40e41ad
[   27.181082] RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 00007ffe64c22008 RDI: 0000000000000002
[   27.182030] RBP: 00007ffe64c21ff0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe64c22788
[   27.183038] R10: 0000000000000064 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
[   27.184006] R13: 00007ffe64c22788 R14: 00007effb42a1000 R15: 0000000000000000
[   27.184958]  </TASK>

It complains about acquiring a local_lock while holding a raw_spin_lock.
It means it should not allocate memory while holding a raw_spin_lock
since it is not safe for RT.

raw_spin_lock is needed because bpf_local_storage supports tracing
context. In particular for task local storage, it is easy to
get a "current" task PTR_TO_BTF_ID in tracing bpf prog.
However, task (and cgroup) local storage has already been moved to
bpf mem allocator which can be used after raw_spin_lock.

The splat is for the sk storage. For sk (and inode) storage,
it has not been moved to bpf mem allocator. Using raw_spin_lock or not,
kzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) could theoretically be unsafe in tracing context.
However, the local storage helper requires a verifier accepted
sk pointer (PTR_TO_BTF_ID), it is hypothetical if that (mean running
a bpf prog in a kzalloc unsafe context and also able to hold a verifier
accepted sk pointer) could happen.

This patch avoids kzalloc after raw_spin_lock to silent the splat.
There is an existing kzalloc before the raw_spin_lock. At that point,
a kzalloc is very likely required because a lookup has just been done
before. Thus, this patch always does the kzalloc before acquiring
the raw_spin_lock and remove the later kzalloc usage after the
raw_spin_lock. After this change, it will have a charge and then
uncharge during the syscall bpf_map_update_elem() code path.
This patch opts for simplicity and not continue the old
optimization to save one charge and uncharge.

This issue is dated back to the very first commit of bpf_sk_storage
which had been refactored multiple times to create task, inode, and
cgroup storage. This patch uses a Fixes tag with a more recent
commit that should be easier to do backport.

Fixes: b00fa38 ("bpf: Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@borkmann
bpf: bpf_sk_storage: Fix invalid wait context lockdep report
a96a44a 
'./test_progs -t test_local_storage' reported a splat:

[   27.137569] =============================
[   27.138122] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[   27.138650] 6.5.0-03980-gd11ae1b16b0a #247 Tainted: G           O
[   27.139542] -----------------------------
[   27.140106] test_progs/1729 is trying to lock:
[   27.140713] ffff8883ef047b88 (stock_lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: local_lock_acquire+0x9/0x130
[   27.141834] other info that might help us debug this:
[   27.142437] context-{5:5}
[   27.142856] 2 locks held by test_progs/1729:
[   27.143352]  #0: ffffffff84bcd9c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x4/0x40
[   27.144492]  #1: ffff888107deb2c0 (&storage->lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: bpf_local_storage_update+0x39e/0x8e0
[   27.145855] stack backtrace:
[   27.146274] CPU: 0 PID: 1729 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G           O       6.5.0-03980-gd11ae1b16b0a #247
[   27.147550] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[   27.149127] Call Trace:
[   27.149490]  <TASK>
[   27.149867]  dump_stack_lvl+0x130/0x1d0
[   27.152609]  dump_stack+0x14/0x20
[   27.153131]  __lock_acquire+0x1657/0x2220
[   27.153677]  lock_acquire+0x1b8/0x510
[   27.157908]  local_lock_acquire+0x29/0x130
[   27.159048]  obj_cgroup_charge+0xf4/0x3c0
[   27.160794]  slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x28e/0x2b0
[   27.161931]  __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x51/0x210
[   27.163557]  __kmalloc+0xaa/0x210
[   27.164593]  bpf_map_kzalloc+0xbc/0x170
[   27.165147]  bpf_selem_alloc+0x130/0x510
[   27.166295]  bpf_local_storage_update+0x5aa/0x8e0
[   27.167042]  bpf_fd_sk_storage_update_elem+0xdb/0x1a0
[   27.169199]  bpf_map_update_value+0x415/0x4f0
[   27.169871]  map_update_elem+0x413/0x550
[   27.170330]  __sys_bpf+0x5e9/0x640
[   27.174065]  __x64_sys_bpf+0x80/0x90
[   27.174568]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0xa0
[   27.175201]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
[   27.175932] RIP: 0033:0x7effb40e41ad
[   27.176357] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d8
[   27.179028] RSP: 002b:00007ffe64c21fc8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
[   27.180088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe64c22768 RCX: 00007effb40e41ad
[   27.181082] RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 00007ffe64c22008 RDI: 0000000000000002
[   27.182030] RBP: 00007ffe64c21ff0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe64c22788
[   27.183038] R10: 0000000000000064 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
[   27.184006] R13: 00007ffe64c22788 R14: 00007effb42a1000 R15: 0000000000000000
[   27.184958]  </TASK>

It complains about acquiring a local_lock while holding a raw_spin_lock.
It means it should not allocate memory while holding a raw_spin_lock
since it is not safe for RT.

raw_spin_lock is needed because bpf_local_storage supports tracing
context. In particular for task local storage, it is easy to
get a "current" task PTR_TO_BTF_ID in tracing bpf prog.
However, task (and cgroup) local storage has already been moved to
bpf mem allocator which can be used after raw_spin_lock.

The splat is for the sk storage. For sk (and inode) storage,
it has not been moved to bpf mem allocator. Using raw_spin_lock or not,
kzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) could theoretically be unsafe in tracing context.
However, the local storage helper requires a verifier accepted
sk pointer (PTR_TO_BTF_ID), it is hypothetical if that (mean running
a bpf prog in a kzalloc unsafe context and also able to hold a verifier
accepted sk pointer) could happen.

This patch avoids kzalloc after raw_spin_lock to silent the splat.
There is an existing kzalloc before the raw_spin_lock. At that point,
a kzalloc is very likely required because a lookup has just been done
before. Thus, this patch always does the kzalloc before acquiring
the raw_spin_lock and remove the later kzalloc usage after the
raw_spin_lock. After this change, it will have a charge and then
uncharge during the syscall bpf_map_update_elem() code path.
This patch opts for simplicity and not continue the old
optimization to save one charge and uncharge.

This issue is dated back to the very first commit of bpf_sk_storage
which had been refactored multiple times to create task, inode, and
cgroup storage. This patch uses a Fixes tag with a more recent
commit that should be easier to do backport.

Fixes: b00fa38 ("bpf: Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bpf rfc V1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@kernel-patches-bot