Skip to content

Conversation

tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl commented Sep 23, 2025

Hi all,

please review this change to the TestGCHeapMemoryUsageEvent test that checks whether these kind of events are posted and contain some sensibles values.

In this failure, the used metric for the first of two events that is checked was zero. This is because G1, the default collector, updates the used value only at certain synchronization points to avoid inconsistencies in other cases. One of these synchronization points is region refill. With the 30gb heap in the test environment, region size is larger than what is allocated during startup, so no region refill/synchronization point has been reached yet, and used turns out to be 0.

This change fixes this by checking the last event instead of the first, it must have happened after that system.gc() call in the test, and used ought to be larger than zero because of allocations during VM startup.

An alternative could be limiting the test's heap size to something small, that would also help, but I thought this might need additional explanations.

Testing: local runs with G1 heap region size >= 16M or so do not fail any more.

Thanks,
Thomas


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8368367: Test jdk/jfr/event/gc/detailed/TestGCHeapMemoryUsageEvent.java fails jdk.GCHeapMemoryUsage "expected 0 > 0" (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27451/head:pull/27451
$ git checkout pull/27451

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27451
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27451/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27451

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27451

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27451.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Hi all,

  please review this change to the TestGCHeapMemoryUsageEvent test that checks whether these kind of events are posted and contain some sensibles values.

In this failure, the `used` metric for the first of two events that is checked was zero. This is because G1, the default collector, updates the `used` value only at certain synchronization points to avoid inconsistencies in other cases. One of these synchronization points is region refill. With the 30gb heap in the test environment, region size is larger than what is allocated during startup, so no region refill/synchronization point has been reached yet, and `used` turns out to be `0`.

This change fixes this by checking the last event instead of the first, it must have happened after that `system.gc()` call in the test, and `used` ought to be larger than zero because of allocations during VM startup.

An alternative could be limiting the test's heap size to something small, that would also help, but I thought this might need additional explanations.

Testing: local runs with G1 heap region size >= 16M or so do not fail any more.

Thanks,
  Thomas
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 23, 2025

👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 23, 2025

@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8368367: Test jdk/jfr/event/gc/detailed/TestGCHeapMemoryUsageEvent.java fails  jdk.GCHeapMemoryUsage "expected 0 > 0"

Reviewed-by: iwalulya, ayang, syan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8368367 8368367: Test jdk/jfr/event/gc/detailed/TestGCHeapMemoryUsageEvent.java fails jdk.GCHeapMemoryUsage "expected 0 > 0" Sep 23, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 23, 2025

@tschatzl The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 23, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 23, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 23, 2025
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This fix works for me

@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @albertnetymk @sendaoYan @walulyai for your reviews
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2025

Going to push as commit ed31023.
Since your change was applied there have been 27 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2025

@tschatzl Pushed as commit ed31023.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants