-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
feat(authz): RR GetDecision improvements #2479
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @alkalescent, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the reliability of the GetDecision
authorization logic by introducing comprehensive unit tests for its input validation, specifically for registered resources. This ensures that the validateGetDecisionRegisteredResource
function behaves as expected under various valid and invalid conditions, improving the overall stability of the authorization service.
Highlights
- Unit Testing: Added new, comprehensive unit tests for the
validateGetDecisionRegisteredResource
function to ensure robust input validation forGetDecision
calls involving registered resources. - Code Maintenance: Removed a
TODO
comment invalidators.go
related to the need for unit tests, indicating the completion of this task.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Code flows, logic gleams, Tests ensure the path is clear, Bugs hide, now revealed.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The code changes introduce a new validation function validateGetDecisionRegisteredResource
and adds corresponding unit tests. The validation function checks the validity of the input parameters for GetDecisionRegisteredResource
, including the registered resource value FQN, action, and resources. The unit tests cover various scenarios, including valid inputs, invalid FQN, empty action name, empty resources, and nil resource in the list.
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
e90f7ae
to
9304cc8
Compare
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
93cbfbe
to
9304cc8
Compare
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.8.0](service/v0.7.0...service/v0.8.0) (2025-07-29) ### Features * **authz:** RR GetDecision improvements ([#2479](#2479)) ([443cedb](443cedb)) * **authz:** sensible request limit upper bounds ([#2526](#2526)) ([b3093cc](b3093cc)) * **core:** Add the ability to configure the http server settings ([#2522](#2522)) ([b1472df](b1472df)) * **policy:** Add list key mappings rpc. ([#2533](#2533)) ([fbc2724](fbc2724)) * **policy:** add obligation protos ([#2579](#2579)) ([50882e1](50882e1)) * **policy:** add obligation tables ([#2532](#2532)) ([c7d7aa4](c7d7aa4)) * **policy:** Add validation to delete keys ([#2576](#2576)) ([cc169d9](cc169d9)) * **policy:** Allow the deletion of a key. ([#2575](#2575)) ([82b96f0](82b96f0)) * **policy:** Change return type for delete key proto. ([#2566](#2566)) ([c1ae924](c1ae924)) * **policy:** sqlc queries refactor ([#2541](#2541)) ([e34680e](e34680e)) ### Bug Fixes * add back grants to listAttributesByDefOrValueFqns ([#2493](#2493)) ([2b47095](2b47095)) * **authz:** access pdp should use proto getter ([#2530](#2530)) ([f856212](f856212)) * **core:** Allow 521 curve to be used ([#2485](#2485)) ([aaf43dc](aaf43dc)) * **core:** resolve 'built-in' typos ([#2548](#2548)) ([ccdfa96](ccdfa96)) * **deps:** bump github.com/opentdf/platform/lib/ocrypto from 0.2.0 to 0.3.0 in /service ([#2504](#2504)) ([a9cc4dd](a9cc4dd)) * **sdk:** Prefer KID and Algorithm selection from key maps ([#2475](#2475)) ([98fd392](98fd392)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.1.0](lib/identifier/v0.0.2...lib/identifier/v0.1.0) (2025-09-17) ### Features * **authz:** RR GetDecision improvements ([#2479](#2479)) ([443cedb](443cedb)) * **policy:** add protovalidate for obligation defs + vals ([#2699](#2699)) ([af5c049](af5c049)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Proposed Changes
Checklist
Testing Instructions