-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
feat(authz): sensible request limit upper bounds #2526
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @jakedoublev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the robustness and predictability of the authorization service by implementing sensible upper bounds on various request parameters. These limits are enforced via buf.validate
rules in the protobuf definitions, preventing excessively large or malformed requests that could impact service stability or performance. Additionally, the PR improves the development workflow by standardizing protobuf generation tooling.
Highlights
- Enforced Request Limits: Introduced sensible upper bounds for various fields within the authorization service's protobuf definitions. This includes limiting the number of entities in an
EntityIdentifier
to 10, attribute values in aResource
to 20, resources in aGetDecisionMultiResourceRequest
to 1000, and individual requests in aGetDecisionBulkRequest
to 200. - Build Process Consistency: Updated the
Makefile
to pin the version ofprotoc-gen-connect-openapi
tov0.18.0
and ensured that thetoolcheck
target runs beforeproto-generate
. This helps maintain consistent tooling versions and prevents unexpected build failures due to dependency changes. - Documentation Updates: The generated gRPC documentation (
docs/grpc/index.html
) has been updated to reflect the newly imposed request limits, providing clear information to consumers of the authorization service API.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Limits set with care, Requests now bounded and safe, Systems breathe with ease.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces sensible upper bounds for request fields in the authorization service, which is a great step towards making the service more robust. The changes in the Makefile to pin tool versions and ensure tools are present before code generation are also welcome improvements for build consistency. I've added a few suggestions to improve the validation messages and expression efficiency in the protobuf definitions.
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.6.0](protocol/go/v0.5.0...protocol/go/v0.6.0) (2025-07-09) ### Features * **authz:** sensible request limit upper bounds ([#2526](#2526)) ([b3093cc](b3093cc)) * **policy:** Add list key mappings rpc. ([#2533](#2533)) ([fbc2724](fbc2724)) ### Bug Fixes * **core:** Allow 521 curve to be used ([#2485](#2485)) ([aaf43dc](aaf43dc)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.8.0](service/v0.7.0...service/v0.8.0) (2025-07-29) ### Features * **authz:** RR GetDecision improvements ([#2479](#2479)) ([443cedb](443cedb)) * **authz:** sensible request limit upper bounds ([#2526](#2526)) ([b3093cc](b3093cc)) * **core:** Add the ability to configure the http server settings ([#2522](#2522)) ([b1472df](b1472df)) * **policy:** Add list key mappings rpc. ([#2533](#2533)) ([fbc2724](fbc2724)) * **policy:** add obligation protos ([#2579](#2579)) ([50882e1](50882e1)) * **policy:** add obligation tables ([#2532](#2532)) ([c7d7aa4](c7d7aa4)) * **policy:** Add validation to delete keys ([#2576](#2576)) ([cc169d9](cc169d9)) * **policy:** Allow the deletion of a key. ([#2575](#2575)) ([82b96f0](82b96f0)) * **policy:** Change return type for delete key proto. ([#2566](#2566)) ([c1ae924](c1ae924)) * **policy:** sqlc queries refactor ([#2541](#2541)) ([e34680e](e34680e)) ### Bug Fixes * add back grants to listAttributesByDefOrValueFqns ([#2493](#2493)) ([2b47095](2b47095)) * **authz:** access pdp should use proto getter ([#2530](#2530)) ([f856212](f856212)) * **core:** Allow 521 curve to be used ([#2485](#2485)) ([aaf43dc](aaf43dc)) * **core:** resolve 'built-in' typos ([#2548](#2548)) ([ccdfa96](ccdfa96)) * **deps:** bump github.com/opentdf/platform/lib/ocrypto from 0.2.0 to 0.3.0 in /service ([#2504](#2504)) ([a9cc4dd](a9cc4dd)) * **sdk:** Prefer KID and Algorithm selection from key maps ([#2475](#2475)) ([98fd392](98fd392)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.7.0](protocol/go/v0.6.2...protocol/go/v0.7.0) (2025-08-08) ### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES * **policy:** disable kas grants in favor of key mappings ([#2220](#2220)) * **core:** Require go 1.23+ ([#1979](#1979)) ### Features * add ability to retrieve policy resources by id or name ([#1901](#1901)) ([deb4455](deb4455)) * **authz:** authz v2, ers v2 protos and gencode for ABAC with actions & registered resource ([#2124](#2124)) ([ea7992a](ea7992a)) * **authz:** improve v2 request proto validation ([#2357](#2357)) ([f927b99](f927b99)) * **authz:** sensible request limit upper bounds ([#2526](#2526)) ([b3093cc](b3093cc)) * **core:** adds bulk rewrap to sdk and service ([#1835](#1835)) ([11698ae](11698ae)) * **core:** EXPERIMENTAL: EC-wrapped key support ([#1902](#1902)) ([652266f](652266f)) * **core:** Require go 1.23+ ([#1979](#1979)) ([164c922](164c922)) * **core:** v2 ERS with proto updates ([#2210](#2210)) ([a161ef8](a161ef8)) * **policy:** add enhanced standard/custom actions protos ([#2020](#2020)) ([bbac53f](bbac53f)) * **policy:** Add legacy keys. ([#2613](#2613)) ([57370b0](57370b0)) * **policy:** Add list key mappings rpc. ([#2533](#2533)) ([fbc2724](fbc2724)) * **policy:** add obligation protos ([#2579](#2579)) ([50882e1](50882e1)) * **policy:** Add validation to delete keys ([#2576](#2576)) ([cc169d9](cc169d9)) * **policy:** add values to CreateObligationRequest ([#2614](#2614)) ([94535cc](94535cc)) * **policy:** adds new public keys table ([#1836](#1836)) ([cad5048](cad5048)) * **policy:** Allow the deletion of a key. ([#2575](#2575)) ([82b96f0](82b96f0)) * **policy:** cache SubjectConditionSet selectors in dedicated column maintained via trigger ([#2320](#2320)) ([215791f](215791f)) * **policy:** Change return type for delete key proto. ([#2566](#2566)) ([c1ae924](c1ae924)) * **policy:** Default Platform Keys ([#2254](#2254)) ([d7447fe](d7447fe)) * **policy:** disable kas grants in favor of key mappings ([#2220](#2220)) ([30f8cf5](30f8cf5)) * **policy:** DSPX-1018 NDR retrieval by FQN support ([#2131](#2131)) ([0001041](0001041)) * **policy:** DSPX-1057 registered resource action attribute values (protos only) ([#2217](#2217)) ([6375596](6375596)) * **policy:** DSPX-893 NDR define crud protos ([#2056](#2056)) ([55a5c27](55a5c27)) * **policy:** DSPX-902 NDR service crud protos only (1/2) ([#2092](#2092)) ([24b6cb5](24b6cb5)) * **policy:** Finish resource mapping groups ([#2224](#2224)) ([5ff754e](5ff754e)) * **policy:** key management crud ([#2110](#2110)) ([4c3d53d](4c3d53d)) * **policy:** Key management proto ([#2115](#2115)) ([561f853](561f853)) * **policy:** Modify get request to search for keys by kasid with keyid. ([#2147](#2147)) ([780d2e4](780d2e4)) * **policy:** Return KAS Key structure ([#2172](#2172)) ([7f97b99](7f97b99)) * **policy:** Return Simple Kas Keys from non-Key RPCs ([#2387](#2387)) ([5113e0e](5113e0e)) * **policy:** rotate keys rpc ([#2180](#2180)) ([0d00743](0d00743)) * **policy:** Update key status's and UpdateKey rpc. ([#2315](#2315)) ([7908db9](7908db9)) * **policy:** Update simple kas key ([#2378](#2378)) ([09d8239](09d8239)) ### Bug Fixes * add pagination to list public key mappings response ([#1889](#1889)) ([9898fbd](9898fbd)) * **core:** Allow 521 curve to be used ([#2485](#2485)) ([aaf43dc](aaf43dc)) * **core:** Fixes protoJSON parse bug on ec rewrap ([#1943](#1943)) ([9bebfd0](9bebfd0)) * **core:** Update fixtures and flattening in sdk and service ([#1827](#1827)) ([d6d6a7a](d6d6a7a)) * **deps:** bump toolchain in /lib/fixtures and /examples to resolve CVE GO-2025-3563 ([#2061](#2061)) ([9c16843](9c16843)) * **policy:** protovalidate deprecated action types and removal of gRPC gateway in subject mappings svc ([#2377](#2377)) ([54a6de0](54a6de0)) * **policy:** remove gRPC gateway in policy except where needed ([#2382](#2382)) ([1937acb](1937acb)) * **policy:** remove new public keys rpc's ([#1962](#1962)) ([5049bab](5049bab)) * **policy:** remove predefined rules in actions protos ([#2069](#2069)) ([060f059](060f059)) * **policy:** return kas uri on keys for definition, namespace and values ([#2186](#2186)) ([6c55fb8](6c55fb8)) * **sdk:** Fix compatibility between bulk and non-bulk rewrap ([#1914](#1914)) ([74abbb6](74abbb6)) * update key_mode to provide more context ([#2226](#2226)) ([44d0805](44d0805)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). --------- Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Krish Suchak <[email protected]>
Proposed Changes
make proto-generate
should runtoolcheck
first and suggest pinned dependency versions for consistencyChecklist
Testing Instructions