fix(request): two bugs when preparing pay transaction #404
Conversation
Because the token selector and the request component both depend on selectedTokenAddress and selectedChainID, they will try to execute their effects at the same time. This causes the request component to use incorrect token price data. This commit fixes that by adding a tokenPriceCompleted state to the token selector context, which is set to true once the token price has been fetched. Refs: #98
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the renaming of the utility function for token address comparison from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (3)
24-24: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The addition of
tokenPriceCompletedto the context is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. It will help track the completion status of token price fetching.Consider removing the
as booleantype assertion, as TypeScript can infer the type from the literalfalse:- tokenPriceCompleted: false as boolean, + tokenPriceCompleted: false,
38-39: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The addition of the
tokenPriceCompletedstate variable is consistent with the context definition and PR objectives. It will help manage the token price fetching completion status within the component.Consider removing the explicit type annotation
<boolean>, as TypeScript can infer the type from the initial value:- const [tokenPriceCompleted, setTokenPriceCompleted] = useState<boolean>(false) + const [tokenPriceCompleted, setTokenPriceCompleted] = useState(false)
95-102: LGTM with a minor formatting suggestion.The addition of the cleanup function to reset
tokenPriceCompletedwhen the user is not connected is a good practice. It helps maintain consistent state and prevents stale data.The indentation of the cleanup function seems off. Consider adjusting the indentation for better readability:
if (!isConnected) { setSelectedTokenPrice(undefined) setSelectedTokenDecimals(undefined) setInputDenomination('TOKEN') - return () => { - setTokenPriceCompleted(false) - } + return () => { + setTokenPriceCompleted(false) + } } else if (selectedTokenAddress && selectedChainID) {src/utils/general.utils.ts (1)
328-329: Enhance comment clarityConsider combining and rephrasing the comments for better clarity.
Proposed change:
- // By using ethers.getAddress we are safe from different cases - // and other address formatting + // ethers.utils.getAddress normalizes addresses for case-insensitive comparison and standard formatting
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/utils/general.utils.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (3)
78-78: LGTM: Correctly updatestokenPriceCompletedstate.The update to
tokenPriceCompletedis placed correctly after successfully fetching the token price and decimals. This ensures that the state accurately reflects the completion of the token price fetching process, which aligns with the PR objectives.
141-141: LGTM: Correctly exposestokenPriceCompletedthrough the context.The addition of
tokenPriceCompletedto the context provider's value prop is correct and necessary. This makes the state available to components consuming this context, which is consistent with the context definition and the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-147: Summary: Implementation successfully addresses PR objectives.The changes in this file successfully implement the
tokenPriceCompletedstate variable as described in the PR objectives. This new state helps ensure that the request component receives accurate token price information by tracking the completion of the token price fetching process.Key points:
- The
tokenPriceCompletedstate is correctly integrated into the context and component.- The state is properly updated when token prices are fetched and reset when necessary.
- The new state is made available to consuming components through the context provider.
These changes should effectively resolve the issue of potential race conditions between the token selector and request component, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
To ensure that these changes don't introduce any unintended side effects, consider running the following verification:
This script will help identify components that might need to be updated to account for the new
tokenPriceCompletedstate.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
The implementation of
tokenPriceCompletedinsrc/context/tokenSelector.context.tsxhas been thoroughly verified. The state is correctly managed within the context and is appropriately utilized insrc/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsxto handle token price completion logic.No unintended side effects or issues were identified in the codebase related to this change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any components that might be affected by the new tokenPriceCompleted state # Test: Search for components using the tokenSelector context echo "Components using tokenSelector context:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "useContext.*tokenSelectorContext" # Test: Search for components that might be relying on selectedTokenPrice or selectedTokenDecimals echo "\nComponents potentially affected by tokenPriceCompleted:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "selectedTokenPrice|selectedTokenDecimals"Length of output: 429
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any components that might be affected by the new tokenPriceCompleted state # Test: Search for components using the tokenSelector context echo "Components using tokenSelector context:" rg "useContext.*tokenSelectorContext" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test: Search for components that might be relying on selectedTokenPrice or selectedTokenDecimals echo "\nComponents potentially affected by tokenPriceCompleted:" rg "selectedTokenPrice|selectedTokenDecimals" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 7295
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all usages of `tokenPriceCompleted` across the codebase echo "Searching for usages of tokenPriceCompleted:" rg "tokenPriceCompleted" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 668
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (3)
31-36: DestructuringtokenPriceCompletedfrom contextThe addition of
tokenPriceCompletedin the destructuring oftokenSelectorContextensures that the component is aware of the token price fetch completion status and can manage the flow accordingly.
63-66: Correct utilization ofutils.compareTokenAddressesfor address comparisonUsing
utils.compareTokenAddresseshere efficiently handles case-insensitive comparisons of token addresses, resolving issues arising from direct string comparisons.
133-136: Consistent use ofutils.compareTokenAddressesin conditionConsistently using
utils.compareTokenAddressesensures accurate, case-insensitive token address comparisons throughout the component.src/utils/general.utils.ts (1)
5-5: Proper import of ethers libraryGood job on importing the
etherslibrary to utilize its utilities for address handling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (3)
Line range hint
16-23: Consider extracting token symbol determination logicThe nested find operations to determine the token symbol are complex and could be extracted into a separate function for improved readability and maintainability.
Consider creating a utility function like this:
const getTokenSymbol = (requestLinkData: _consts.IRequestLinkData | undefined): string => { if (!requestLinkData) return ''; const chain = consts.peanutTokenDetails.find((chain) => chain.chainId === requestLinkData.chainId); if (!chain) return requestLinkData.tokenSymbol || ''; const token = chain.tokens.find((token) => utils.areTokenAddressesEqual(token.address, requestLinkData.tokenAddress || '') ); return token?.symbol || requestLinkData.tokenSymbol || ''; };Then use it in the component like this:
{getTokenSymbol(requestLinkData)}This would simplify the JSX and make the logic easier to understand and maintain.
Line range hint
16-26: Add error handling for chain and token not found scenariosThe current implementation doesn't handle cases where the chain or token is not found. This could lead to unexpected behavior or errors.
Consider adding fallback values or error messages for these scenarios. For example:
<label className="text-h8 font-bold "> This link previously requested{' '} {getTokenSymbol(requestLinkData) || 'Unknown Token'}{' '} on{' '} {consts.supportedPeanutChains?.find((chain) => chain.chainId == requestLinkData?.chainId)?.name || 'Unknown Chain'} </label>This ensures that even if the chain or token is not found, the user will see a meaningful message instead of potentially seeing nothing or encountering an error.
Line range hint
36-38: Review conflicting width classes in Link componentThe Link component at the bottom of the view has both a fixed width (
w-[27rem]) and a full width (w-full) class. This could lead to unexpected layout behavior.Consider choosing either the fixed width or full width based on your design requirements. If you need the component to be responsive,
w-fullmight be more appropriate. If you need a consistent width regardless of screen size, keep only thew-[27rem]class.<Link - className="absolute bottom-0 flex h-20 w-[27rem] w-full flex-row items-center justify-start gap-2 border-t-[1px] border-black bg-purple-3 px-4.5 dark:text-black" + className="absolute bottom-0 flex h-20 w-full flex-row items-center justify-start gap-2 border-t-[1px] border-black bg-purple-3 px-4.5 dark:text-black" href={'/send'} >src/components/Global/ConfirmDetails/Index.tsx (1)
48-48: Approved: Consistent token address comparison for symbol lookupThe change to
utils.areTokenAddressesEqualis correctly applied here for token symbol lookup, maintaining consistency with the previous instances. This ensures uniform token address comparison across different use cases within the component.Consider refactoring the nested ternary operation to improve readability. For example, you could extract the token lookup logic into a separate function:
const getTokenSymbol = (data: any, chainId: string, tokenAddress: string) => { const chainData = data ? data.find((chain: any) => chain.chainId === chainId) : consts.peanutTokenDetails.find((detail) => detail.chainId === chainId); return chainData?.tokens.find((token: any) => utils.areTokenAddressesEqual(token.address, tokenAddress) )?.symbol; }; // Then in JSX: {getTokenSymbol(data, selectedChainID, selectedTokenAddress)}This would make the component's render method cleaner and easier to understand.
src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (4)
24-24: Consider renaming the variable and removing unnecessary type assertionThe addition of
isTokenPriceFetchingCompletealigns with the PR objectives. However, consider the following improvements:
- Rename to
isTokenPriceFetchingCompletetoisTokenPriceFetchCompletefor better clarity, as suggested in the past review comments.- Remove the unnecessary
as booleantype assertion, as the value is already a boolean literal.Here's the suggested change:
- isTokenPriceFetchingComplete: false as boolean, + isTokenPriceFetchComplete: false,
38-38: Ensure consistent naming of the state variableFor consistency with the earlier suggestion, consider renaming the state variable:
- const [isTokenPriceFetchingComplete, setTokenPriceFetchingComplete] = useState<boolean>(false) + const [isTokenPriceFetchComplete, setIsTokenPriceFetchComplete] = useState(false)Also, note that the type annotation
<boolean>can be omitted as TypeScript can infer the type from the initial value.
78-78: Update the setter name for consistency and approve the logicThe logic for setting the token price fetching completion status is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.
For consistency with the earlier suggestions, update the setter name:
- setTokenPriceFetchingComplete(true) + setIsTokenPriceFetchComplete(true)
100-102: Approve the cleanup logic and update the setter nameThe addition of the cleanup function is a good practice. It ensures that the token price fetching status is reset when the component unmounts or when the effect's dependencies change, preventing potential stale state issues.
For consistency with the earlier suggestions, update the setter name:
return () => { - setTokenPriceFetchingComplete(false) + setIsTokenPriceFetchComplete(false) }src/components/Dashboard/useDashboard.tsx (2)
127-127: Approve the function name change and suggest a minor improvement.The change from
compareTokenAddressestoareTokenAddressesEqualis a good improvement that aligns with the PR objectives. It addresses the case-sensitive comparison issue and makes the function name more descriptive.Consider extracting the token finding logic into a separate function for improved readability:
const findTokenByAddress = (chainId: number, tokenAddress: string) => consts.peanutTokenDetails .find((token) => token.chainId === chainId) ?.tokens.find((token) => utils.areTokenAddressesEqual(token.address, tokenAddress)); // Usage tokenSymbol: findTokenByAddress(link.chainId, link.tokenAddress ?? '')?.symbol ?? '',This would make the code more modular and easier to maintain.
169-169: Approve the function name change and emphasize refactoring importance.The change from
compareTokenAddressestoareTokenAddressesEqualis consistent with the previous occurrences and aligns with the PR objectives.Given that this pattern appears multiple times in the file (lines 127, 148, 169, and 190), it's even more important to consider extracting the token finding logic into a separate function. This refactoring would significantly improve code maintainability and reduce duplication. Here's a suggested implementation:
const findTokenByAddress = (chainId: number, tokenAddress: string | undefined) => consts.peanutTokenDetails .find((token) => token.chainId === chainId) ?.tokens.find((token) => utils.areTokenAddressesEqual(token.address, tokenAddress ?? '')); // Usage tokenSymbol: findTokenByAddress(link.chainId, link.tokenAddress)?.symbol ?? '',This function could be placed at the beginning of the
composeLinkDataArrayfunction or extracted to a separate utility file if it's used elsewhere in the codebase.Also applies to: 190-190
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (2)
Line range hint
258-272: Enhance Type Safety by Refining Parameter TypesIn the
createLinkWrapperfunction, consider specifying more precise types for improved type safety and code clarity:
- For the
typeparameter, use a union type to restrict it to expected values.- Replace the
anytype forresponsewith specific interfaces.Apply the following changes:
const createLinkWrapper = async ({ type, response, linkDetails, password, feeOptions, usdValue, }: { - type: string - response: any + type: 'deposit' | 'gasless' + response: DepositResponse | GaslessResponse linkDetails: peanutInterfaces.IPeanutLinkDetails password: string feeOptions?: any usdValue?: string }) => {Please define
DepositResponseandGaslessResponseinterfaces to match the expected structure ofresponsein each case.
Line range hint
288-290: Add Context to Error Handling for Better DebuggingWhen re-throwing errors in the
createLinkWrapperfunction, adding context can aid in debugging by providing clearer error messages.Apply this diff to enhance error handling:
} catch (error) { - throw error + throw new Error(`Error in createLinkWrapper: ${error.message}`) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/Create/Create.utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Dashboard/useDashboard.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/components/Global/ConfirmDetails/Index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Global/ImageGeneration/LinkPreview.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelector.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Profile/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/utils/cashout.utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/general.utils.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (21)
src/components/Create/Create.utils.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-71: Verify implementation oftokenPriceCompletedstate variableWhile this file successfully addresses the case-sensitive token address comparison issue, it doesn't include any changes related to the
tokenPriceCompletedstate variable mentioned in the PR objectives. This variable was intended to resolve issues between the token selector and request component.To ensure this feature has been implemented elsewhere, let's search for it in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for tokenPriceCompleted implementation echo "Searching for tokenPriceCompleted implementation:" rg --type typescript 'tokenPriceCompleted'If the search doesn't yield results, please ensure that the
tokenPriceCompletedstate variable has been implemented in the appropriate file, likely within the token selector context.
55-66: LGTM! Consistent use ofareTokenAddressesEqualaddresses case-sensitivity issue.The changes effectively replace
compareTokenAddresseswithareTokenAddressesEqual, which should resolve the case-sensitive comparison issue for token addresses as mentioned in the PR objectives. This modification is applied consistently throughout thegetTokenDetailsfunction.To ensure this change is applied consistently across the entire codebase, let's verify the usage:
This script will help us confirm that
compareTokenAddresseshas been completely replaced andareTokenAddressesEqualis used consistently.✅ Verification successful
Verified! No remaining usage of
compareTokenAddressesfound and consistent usage ofareTokenAddressesEqualacross the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of areTokenAddressesEqual and absence of compareTokenAddresses # Test 1: Check for any remaining usage of compareTokenAddresses echo "Checking for any remaining usage of compareTokenAddresses:" rg --type typescript 'compareTokenAddresses' # Test 2: Verify the usage of areTokenAddressesEqual echo "Verifying the usage of areTokenAddressesEqual:" rg --type typescript 'areTokenAddressesEqual'Length of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of areTokenAddressesEqual and absence of compareTokenAddresses # Test 1: Check for any remaining usage of compareTokenAddresses echo "Checking for any remaining usage of compareTokenAddresses:" rg --type ts 'compareTokenAddresses' # Test 2: Verify the usage of areTokenAddressesEqual echo "Verifying the usage of areTokenAddressesEqual:" rg --type ts 'areTokenAddressesEqual'Length of output: 4341
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (1)
22-22: Function rename improves clarity and addresses case-sensitivity issue.The change from
utils.compareTokenAddressestoutils.areTokenAddressesEqualaligns with the PR objective of addressing the case-sensitive comparison of token addresses. This rename likely reflects an underlying implementation change to ensure case-insensitive comparison.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if this function has been updated everywhere:
✅ Verification successful
Function rename successfully propagated throughout the codebase.
All instances of
compareTokenAddresseshave been replaced withareTokenAddressesEqual, including inAlreadyPaid.view.tsx. This ensures consistency and addresses the case-sensitive comparison issue as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of compareTokenAddresses and new uses of areTokenAddressesEqual echo "Checking for remaining instances of compareTokenAddresses:" rg --type typescript "compareTokenAddresses" echo "\nChecking for new uses of areTokenAddressesEqual:" rg --type typescript "areTokenAddressesEqual"Length of output: 398
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of compareTokenAddresses and new uses of areTokenAddressesEqual echo "Checking for remaining instances of compareTokenAddresses:" rg "compareTokenAddresses" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" echo "\nChecking for new uses of areTokenAddressesEqual:" rg "areTokenAddressesEqual" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 4387
src/components/Global/ConfirmDetails/Index.tsx (4)
32-32: Approved: Addresses case-sensitive token address comparisonThe change from
utils.compareTokenAddressestoutils.areTokenAddressesEqualaligns with the PR objective of resolving the case-sensitive comparison of token addresses. This should correctly handle token addresses that differ only in case, improving the reliability of token matching.
37-37: Approved: Consistent application of token address comparisonThis change maintains consistency with the previous modification, ensuring that
utils.areTokenAddressesEqualis used for token address comparison in both the primary and fallback logic paths. This consistency is crucial for reliable token matching across different scenarios.
53-53: Approved: Consistent token address comparison in fallback logicThis final change to
utils.areTokenAddressesEqualcompletes the set of modifications needed to address the case-sensitive comparison issue throughout the component. It ensures that token symbol lookup uses the same comparison method in both the primary and fallback logic paths.The refactoring suggestion from the previous comment applies here as well. Extracting the token lookup logic into a separate function would improve the overall readability of this component.
Line range hint
1-85: Summary: Successfully addressed case-sensitive token address comparisonThe changes in this file consistently replace
utils.compareTokenAddresseswithutils.areTokenAddressesEqual, addressing the case-sensitive comparison issue mentioned in the PR objectives. This modification improves the reliability of token matching throughout theConfirmDetailscomponent.However, it's worth noting that the second objective mentioned in the PR summary, regarding the introduction of a
tokenPriceCompletedstate variable, is not addressed in this file. This might be implemented in another file not included in this review.To ensure that all instances of
compareTokenAddresseshave been replaced and that no references to the old function remain, please run the following verification script:This will help ensure the completeness of the changes across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
To address the issue with the shell scripts, please use the following updated verification commands that correctly target TypeScript files:
This should correctly search through
.tsand.tsxfiles for the specified functions.
Confirmed: All instances of
compareTokenAddresseshave been successfully replaced withareTokenAddressesEqualin theConfirmDetailscomponent.
- No remaining references to
compareTokenAddressesfound in the codebase.areTokenAddressesEqualis consistently used withinsrc/components/Global/ConfirmDetails/Index.tsx.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of compareTokenAddresses in the codebase # Test: Search for compareTokenAddresses. Expect: No results rg --type typescript 'compareTokenAddresses' # Test: Confirm areTokenAddressesEqual is used in ConfirmDetails component rg --type typescript 'areTokenAddressesEqual' src/components/Global/ConfirmDetails/Index.tsxLength of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of compareTokenAddresses in the codebase # Test: Search for compareTokenAddresses. Expect: No results rg --type ts 'compareTokenAddresses' # Test: Confirm areTokenAddressesEqual is used in ConfirmDetails component rg --type ts 'areTokenAddressesEqual' src/components/Global/ConfirmDetails/Index.tsxLength of output: 545
src/components/Global/ImageGeneration/LinkPreview.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-160: LGTM: Component structure and implementation are sound.The
LinkPreviewImgcomponent is well-structured and follows React best practices. The recent change to address case-sensitive token address comparison is the only modification, and it integrates seamlessly with the existing code. The component's functionality for generating a link preview image remains intact and should now be more accurate in matching token addresses.
21-21: Approve the change to address case-sensitive token address comparison.The modification from
utils.compareTokenAddressestoutils.areTokenAddressesEqualaligns with the PR objective of fixing the case-sensitive comparison of token addresses. This change should resolve the issue where two token addresses that should be considered equal were treated as different due to case sensitivity.To ensure the correct implementation of
areTokenAddressesEqual, let's verify its definition:✅ Verification successful
--- <!-- [monologue] [task finalize_verification_1/1] With the implementation of `areTokenAddressesEqual` successfully retrieved, I can now assess whether it correctly addresses the case-sensitive comparison of token addresses as intended by the PR. [observations] - The function converts both addresses to lowercase. - It replaces a specific address with the zero address if matched. - Utilizes `ethers.utils.getAddress` to normalize the address format, ensuring case insensitivity. - Compares the normalized addresses for equality. [analysis] - The implementation effectively handles case-insensitive comparison by normalizing both addresses before comparison. - Replacing the specific address with a standardized zero address ensures consistency. - Using `ethers.utils.getAddress` strengthens the reliability of the comparison by enforcing checksum validation. [actions] - Conclude that the change meets the PR objectives. - Approve the change with a verification tag. --> **Approve the change to address case-sensitive token address comparison.** The replacement of `utils.compareTokenAddresses` with `utils.areTokenAddressesEqual` effectively ensures that token address comparisons are case-insensitive. The implementation normalizes both addresses to lowercase, replaces specific instances with a standardized address, and utilizes `ethers.utils.getAddress` to maintain consistent address formatting before performing the comparison. This change aligns with the PR's objective and mitigates issues related to case sensitivity in token address comparisons. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of areTokenAddressesEqual function # Test: Search for the areTokenAddressesEqual function definition rg --type typescript -A 10 'function areTokenAddressesEqual'Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of areTokenAddressesEqual function # Test: Search for the areTokenAddressesEqual function definition using correct file type rg --type ts --type tsx -A 10 'function areTokenAddressesEqual'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of areTokenAddressesEqual function # Test: Search for the areTokenAddressesEqual function definition in TypeScript files rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' 'function areTokenAddressesEqual'Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of areTokenAddressesEqual function with flexible pattern # Test: Search for any declaration of areTokenAddressesEqual in TypeScript files rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' 'areTokenAddressesEqual\s*='Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of areTokenAddressesEqual function # Test: Retrieve the full implementation of areTokenAddressesEqual from the specified file rg 'export const areTokenAddressesEqual' -A 10 src/utils/general.utils.tsLength of output: 738
src/components/Dashboard/useDashboard.tsx (2)
148-148: Approve the function name change and reference previous suggestion.The change from
compareTokenAddressestoareTokenAddressesEqualis consistent with the previous occurrence and aligns with the PR objectives.The same improvement suggestion from the previous comment applies here as well. Extracting the token finding logic into a separate function would improve readability and maintainability across all occurrences.
Line range hint
1-290: Summary of changes and PR objectives.The changes in this file consistently address one of the two issues mentioned in the PR objectives: the case-sensitive comparison of token addresses. The function name change from
compareTokenAddressestoareTokenAddressesEqualeffectively resolves this issue.However, the second issue mentioned in the PR objectives, regarding the introduction of a new state variable
tokenPriceCompleted, is not addressed in this file. This suggests that the changes related to that issue might be in other files not included in this review.To ensure all PR objectives are met, please verify that the changes related to the
tokenPriceCompletedstate variable are present in other relevant files, particularly in the token selector context.This will help confirm that all aspects of the PR objectives have been addressed across the codebase.
src/utils/cashout.utils.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-594: Overall assessment: Focused change addressing case-sensitive token address comparisonThe single change made in this file effectively addresses one of the two bugs mentioned in the PR objectives. The update to the token address comparison method in the
getBridgeTokenNamefunction should resolve the case sensitivity issue without introducing any negative impacts on the file's overall functionality.
327-332: Approved: Address comparison method updated to resolve case sensitivity issueThe change from
utils.compareTokenAddressestoutils.areTokenAddressesEqualaligns with the PR objective of addressing the case-sensitive comparison of token addresses. This update should resolve the issue where token addresses that should have been considered equal were treated as different due to case sensitivity.To ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All instances of
compareTokenAddresseshave been replaced withareTokenAddressesEqualacross the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of compareTokenAddresses rg "compareTokenAddresses" --type ts # Search for all instances of areTokenAddressesEqual to verify correct usage rg "areTokenAddressesEqual" --type tsLength of output: 4111
src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelector.tsx (3)
116-116: Approve: Improved token address comparisonThis change from
utils.compareTokenAddressestoutils.areTokenAddressesEqualaddresses the case-sensitive comparison issue mentioned in the PR objectives. The new function name more accurately reflects its purpose of checking equality between token addresses, likely in a case-insensitive manner.
121-121: Approve: Consistent application of improved token address comparisonThis change mirrors the previous one, replacing
utils.compareTokenAddresseswithutils.areTokenAddressesEqualfor finding the displayed token balance. It ensures consistent and correct token address comparison throughout the component, fully addressing the case-sensitive comparison issue mentioned in the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-359: Verify: Implementation of all PR objectivesThe changes in this file successfully address the case-sensitive comparison issue for token addresses, which was one of the two bugs mentioned in the PR objectives. However, I don't see any changes related to the second bug concerning the interaction between the token selector and request component, specifically the introduction of a
tokenPriceCompletedstate variable.Could you please confirm if the fix for the second bug is implemented in another file? If so, it would be helpful to review that file as well to ensure all PR objectives are met.
src/components/Profile/index.tsx (1)
572-572: Approved: Address comparison function updated as per PR objectivesThe change from
utils.compareTokenAddressestoutils.areTokenAddressesEqualaligns with the PR objective of addressing the case-sensitive comparison of token addresses. This update should resolve the issue of treating case-different but otherwise identical addresses as distinct, ensuring more accurate referral point calculations.src/utils/general.utils.ts (1)
323-330: Excellent improvements to token address comparison!The changes in this function address the case-sensitive comparison issue mentioned in the PR objectives and improve overall code quality:
- Renaming to
areTokenAddressesEqualclearly communicates the function's purpose.- Using
ethers.utils.getAddressensures consistent handling of different address formats and case-insensitivity.- The explicit boolean return type enhances type safety.
These modifications will help prevent potential errors in transaction processing due to address format inconsistencies.
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (2)
77-77: Improved Token Address ComparisonThe use of
utils.areTokenAddressesEqualensures that token addresses are compared in a case-insensitive manner, addressing potential issues with token address matching.
Line range hint
250-254: Conditional Handling of Gasless DepositsThe added check for
isGaslessDepositPossibleenhances the transaction preparation process by conditionally handling gasless deposits when possible. This improves efficiency and user experience.src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (1)
275-275: Consistent use ofutils.areTokenAddressesEqualfor token address comparisonGreat job replacing
utils.compareTokenAddresseswithutils.areTokenAddressesEqualthroughout the code. This improves clarity and ensures consistent token address comparisons.Also applies to: 385-385, 396-396, 401-401
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Request/Pay/utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-19: Consider these minor improvements for enhanced maintainability:
Add a type annotation to the
ADDRESS_ZEROconstant for clarity:export const ADDRESS_ZERO: string = '0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000'Use explicit values in the
EPeanutLinkTypeenum to prevent potential issues if new types are added in the future:export enum EPeanutLinkType { native = 0, erc20 = 1, }These changes would improve type safety and make the code more robust against future modifications.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (7 hunks)
- src/components/Request/Pay/utils.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Request/Pay/utils.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-19: Overall, the changes look good, but more context is needed.The addition of the
NOT_CONNECTEDstatus to theRequestStatusenum is a valid change. However, it's not immediately clear how this relates to the bug fixes mentioned in the PR objectives (case-sensitive token address comparison and token price fetching issues). It would be beneficial to see the other files changed in this PR to understand the full context of these modifications.To ensure comprehensive testing:
- Verify that all components using the
RequestStatusenum handle the newNOT_CONNECTEDstatus correctly.- Update any switch statements or exhaustive checks involving the
RequestStatusenum to include this new value.- If there are unit tests for components using
RequestStatus, ensure they're updated to cover scenarios with the newNOT_CONNECTEDstatus.Let's check for switch statements that might need updating:
#!/bin/bash # Search for switch statements using RequestStatus rg --type typescript "switch.*RequestStatus" src/
17-17: Approved. Please clarify the purpose of this addition.The addition of
NOT_CONNECTEDto theRequestStatusenum is syntactically correct and follows the existing naming convention. However, could you please elaborate on how this new status relates to the bug fixes mentioned in the PR objectives? It would be helpful to understand the specific use case for this new enum value in the context of the described changes to token address comparison and token price fetching.To ensure this new status is being utilized, let's check for its usage:
✅ Verification successful
Verified. The
NOT_CONNECTEDstatus is utilized insrc/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx, aligning with the PR objectives. No issues found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the new NOT_CONNECTED status rg --type typescript "RequestStatus.NOT_CONNECTED" src/Length of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the new NOT_CONNECTED status in TypeScript files rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" "RequestStatus.NOT_CONNECTED" src/Length of output: 207
Because a case sensitive comparison two token addresses were treated as different when they should be equal
Because the token selector and the request component both depend on
selectedTokenAddress and selectedChainID, they will try to execute
their effects at the same time. This causes the request component to use
incorrect token price data. This commit fixes that by adding a
tokenPriceCompleted state to the token selector context, which is set to
true once the token price has been fetched.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
isTokenPriceFetchingComplete, to improve token price fetching and transaction fee estimation.compareTokenAddresseswithareTokenAddressesEqualfor improved accuracy in token selection across multiple components.Bug Fixes
Documentation