[refactor]: discovery into moving queries in claim flow into refactored queries w/ useQuery #421
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily enhancing the functionality related to claim processing and metadata generation in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 24
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
src/components/Claim/types.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Consider specific imports for better maintainability.The imports are correct and necessary for the types defined in this file. However, consider using specific imports instead of wildcard imports for
interfacesand_consts. This can improve code maintainability and reduce the risk of naming conflicts.Example of specific imports:
import { ILinkDetails } from '@/interfaces' import { claimLinkState } from './Claim.consts'
7-15: LGTM! Remember to update "Attachement" to "Attachment".The
CheckLinkReturnTypeis well-defined and comprehensive, covering all necessary properties for a link check operation. The use of imported types and optional properties is appropriate, and the structure of therecipientproperty is well-thought-out.Don't forget to update the spelling of "Attachement" to "Attachment" in this type definition as well:
- attachmentInfo: Attachement + attachmentInfo: Attachment
1-15: Overall, well-structured types that support the PR objectives.The new type definitions in this file align well with the PR's goal of enhancing the claim flow and improving type safety. The
CheckLinkReturnTypeis particularly comprehensive and will contribute to more structured and type-safe data handling in the refactored queries.Consider the following suggestions for further improvement:
- Ensure consistent naming conventions across the codebase (e.g.,
AttachmentvsAttachmentInfo).- If these types are used across multiple components, consider moving them to a shared types file for better reusability.
- Add JSDoc comments to these types to provide more context and improve code documentation.
src/query.ts (2)
3-16: LGTM: Well-structured QueryClient configuration with a note on staleTime.The
makeQueryClientfunction creates a QueryClient with appropriate default options. The custom dehydration behavior is a nice touch for including 'pending' queries.Consider the implications of
staleTime: 0. This setting means queries will be considered stale immediately, which could lead to frequent refetches. Depending on your use case, you might want to set a non-zero value to reduce unnecessary network requests.
20-27: LGTM: Well-implemented singleton pattern for QueryClient.The
getQueryClientfunction effectively manages QueryClient instances for both server and browser environments. It ensures a single instance is reused in the browser while creating new instances for each server request.Consider a minor optimization:
export function getQueryClient() { if (isServer) { return makeQueryClient() } else { - if (!browserQueryClient) browserQueryClient = makeQueryClient() - return browserQueryClient + return browserQueryClient ??= makeQueryClient() } }This change uses the nullish coalescing assignment operator to simplify the logic and reduce the number of lines.
src/app/claim/page.tsx (2)
78-81: Approved: Enhanced data fetching with React QueryGreat job on implementing React Query for data prefetching. This change will improve performance and user experience by loading data before it's needed.
A minor suggestion:
Consider using the
voidoperator more explicitly:void (async () => { await queryClient.prefetchQuery(getClaimQuery(createURL(host, searchParams))) })()This makes it clearer that we're intentionally ignoring the promise result and avoids potential linting issues.
Line range hint
1-89: Overall improvements with room for enhanced error handlingThe changes in this file successfully implement React Query for data fetching and align well with the PR objectives. The code organization has improved, and the use of prefetching should enhance performance.
To further improve robustness:
Consider adding error handling to the prefetch call:
void queryClient.prefetchQuery(getClaimQuery(createURL(host, searchParams))) .catch(error => { console.error('Failed to prefetch claim data:', error); // Optionally, you could dispatch an action to update the UI or show a notification });This will ensure that any prefetching errors are logged and don't silently fail, which could help with debugging and potentially improving user experience by allowing you to react to prefetch failures.
src/components/Claim/useClaimLink.tsx (1)
17-17: Approved: Return type annotation improves type safety.The addition of the return type
Promise<string | undefined>enhances type safety and code clarity. It accurately reflects the function's behavior, considering the various ways the transaction hash is extracted.For consistency, consider updating the return statement to explicitly return
undefinedwhen no hash is found:- return claimTx.transactionHash ?? claimTx.txHash ?? claimTx.hash ?? claimTx.tx_hash ?? '' + return claimTx.transactionHash ?? claimTx.txHash ?? claimTx.hash ?? claimTx.tx_hash ?? undefinedThis change would align the return value with the declared type more precisely.
src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx (2)
Line range hint
36-54: Good use of performance optimization techniques.The component demonstrates good performance practices, particularly with the use of
useMemofor_tokensToDisplay. This helps prevent unnecessary recalculations of the filtered token list.Consider a minor optimization in the filtering logic:
if (filterValue && filterValue.length > 0) { + const lowercaseFilter = filterValue.toLowerCase(); _tokens = _tokens.filter( (token) => - token.name.toLowerCase().includes(filterValue.toLowerCase()) || - token.symbol.toLowerCase().includes(filterValue.toLowerCase()) + token.name.toLowerCase().includes(lowercaseFilter) || + token.symbol.toLowerCase().includes(lowercaseFilter) ) return _tokens }This change avoids repeated
toLowerCase()calls onfilterValue, potentially improving performance for large token lists.
Line range hint
76-85: Good accessibility practices with room for improvement.The component demonstrates consideration for accessibility through the use of the
disabledattribute and focus management. The "sr-only" button in the modal is a good practice for keyboard navigation.To further improve accessibility, consider adding more context for screen readers:
<button className={`...`} onClick={() => { !isStatic && !routeFound && setVisible(true) }} disabled={isLoading} + aria-label={`Select ${tokenSymbol} on ${chainName}`} + aria-haspopup="dialog" > {/* ... */} </button> {/* ... */} -<button className="sr-only" autoFocus ref={focusButtonRef} /> +<button className="sr-only" autoFocus ref={focusButtonRef}> + Focus trapped inside token selection modal +</button>These changes provide more context to screen reader users about the button's purpose and the modal's content.
Also applies to: 155-155
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (2)
54-54: Approve type change, consider initializing as undefinedThe change to
string | undefinedimproves type safety by accurately representing thatclaimTxHashmight not be assigned a value in some scenarios. This aligns well with the error handling later in the function.Consider initializing
claimTxHashasundefinedinstead of an empty string for consistency with its new type:-let claimTxHash: string | undefined = '' +let claimTxHash: string | undefinedThis change would make the initial state more accurately reflect the variable's possible values.
54-54: Approve change, consider further improvementsThis type change aligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing type safety and reducing the likelihood of React-related bugs. It's a small but meaningful improvement in the context of the larger refactoring effort.
Consider the following suggestions for further improvements:
Error handling: Implement more granular error handling to provide specific error messages for different failure scenarios (e.g., network issues, contract errors).
State management: As part of the transition to react-query, consider moving the claim logic into a custom hook or query function. This could help separate concerns and make the component more focused on rendering.
Loading state: Instead of managing loading state manually, leverage react-query's built-in loading states to simplify the component logic.
These suggestions align with the PR's goals of improving code quality and leveraging react-query's capabilities.
src/components/Claim/services/query.ts (4)
29-35: Remove or restore the commented-out estimation codeThere is a block of commented-out code related to estimating points. If this code is obsolete, please remove it to keep the codebase clean. If it's pending implementation, consider adding a TODO comment explaining when it will be addressed.
60-61: Avoid variable shadowing by renaming 'link'In the
queryFn, the variablelinkis redeclared, which shadows the outerlinkparameter and may cause confusion. Rename the innerlinkvariable to avoid potential issues.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
- const link = `https://peanut.to/claim?${searchParams}` + const fullLink = `https://peanut.to/claim?${searchParams}`Update the function call accordingly:
- return fetchClaim(link) + return fetchClaim(fullLink)
58-59: Remove console.log statement in production codeThe
console.log('queryKey: ', queryKey)statement is useful for debugging but should be removed or replaced with a proper logging mechanism in production code to avoid unnecessary console output.Apply this diff to remove the console log:
- console.log('queryKey: ', queryKey)
11-11: Initialize 'linkState' appropriatelyThe variable
linkStateis initially set to'ALREADY_CLAIMED'. However, this might not be the correct default state before checkinglinkDetails.claimed. Consider setting it to a neutral state like'LOADING'or'UNKNOWN'until the actual state is determined.Apply this diff to adjust the initial state:
- let linkState: _consts.claimLinkState = 'ALREADY_CLAIMED' + let linkState: _consts.claimLinkState = 'LOADING'src/services/peanut-api.ts (2)
50-50: Remove debuggingconsole.logstatementThe
console.logstatement on line 50 appears to be used for debugging. It's best practice to remove or comment out such statements in production code to prevent unnecessary console output and potential exposure of sensitive information.Apply this diff to remove the debugging statement:
- console.log('estimatePoints', { args })
39-39: MakeslippageconfigurableThe
slippagevalue is hardcoded to1, which may not be suitable for all scenarios. Consider makingslippagea configurable parameter to provide flexibility for different use cases.Apply this diff to update the
GetSquidRouteRawArgstype and method:export type GetSquidRouteRawArgs = { linkDetails: ILinkDetails toToken: string toChain: string toAddress: string + slippage?: number } - getSquidRouteRaw = async ({ linkDetails, toChain, toToken, toAddress }: GetSquidRouteRawArgs) => { + getSquidRouteRaw = async ({ linkDetails, toChain, toToken, toAddress, slippage = 1 }: GetSquidRouteRawArgs) => { const { squidRouterUrl } = this const { chainId: fromChain, tokenAddress: fromToken, tokenAmount, tokenDecimals, senderAddress: fromAddress, } = linkDetails const fromAmount = Math.floor(Number(tokenAmount) * Math.pow(10, tokenDecimals)).toString() return getSquidRouteRaw({ squidRouterUrl, fromChain, fromToken, fromAmount, - slippage: 1, + slippage, fromAddress, toToken, toChain, toAddress, }) }src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx (1)
78-82: Clean up commented-out code for better readabilityLines 78-82 contain commented-out code that is no longer in use. Removing unused code helps maintain code cleanliness and readability.
-// if (data.crossChainDetails) { -// setSelectedChainID(data?.crossChainDetails?.[0]?.chainId) -// setSelectedTokenAddress(data?.crossChainDetails?.[0]?.tokens[0]?.address) -// }src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (4)
95-95: Remove unnecessary console.log statementThe
console.log('queryKey', queryKey)statement appears to be used for debugging purposes. It's recommended to remove debug logs to clean up the console output in production.Apply this change:
- console.log('queryKey', queryKey)
244-256: Eliminate console.log statements in useEffectThere are
console.logstatements within theuseEffecthook used for debugging. These should be removed to avoid cluttering the console in production.Apply this change:
- console.log({ address }) useEffect(() => { - /** - * WIP: Solve Recipient side effect - */ - console.log({ address }) if (recipient.address) return if (isConnected && address) { setRecipient({ name: undefined, address }) } else { - console.log('Recipient address is not set') setRecipient({ name: undefined, address: '' }) setIsValidRecipient(false) } }, [address])
528-537: Avoid logging within the render functionThe anonymous function within the render is logging state variables, which can impact performance and should be avoided in production code.
Apply this change:
- {(() => { - console.log({ - claiming, - isValidRecipient, - refetchingRoute, - inputChanging, - hasFetchedRoute, - route, - recipient, - }) - return null - })()}
105-106: Use a descriptive mutation keyThe mutation key
'claiming-'is not descriptive and might lead to cache conflicts. Mutation keys should be unique and descriptive.Consider updating the mutation key to include relevant identifiers.
- mutationKey: ['claiming-', claimLinkData], + mutationKey: ['claiming', claimLinkData.link],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/app/claim/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (11 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/services/cross-chain.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/services/query.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/useClaimLink.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/utils/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/config/wagmi.config.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/query.ts (1 hunks)
- src/services/app-api.ts (1 hunks)
- src/services/peanut-api.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- package.json
- src/components/utils/utils.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx
[error] 15-15: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx
[error] 365-365: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
src/services/app-api.ts
[error] 1-13: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
src/query.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports from '@tanstack/react-query' are relevant to the functionality being implemented in this file.
18-18: LGTM: Appropriate variable declaration for singleton pattern.The
browserQueryClientvariable is correctly declared asletand typed asQueryClient | undefined, allowing for its use in the singleton pattern implemented ingetQueryClient.
1-27: Great implementation of QueryClient management system.This file successfully implements a QueryClient management system using @tanstack/react-query, handling both server-side rendering and browser environments effectively. The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing data fetching and management, which should contribute to reducing React-related bugs and improving team efficiency.
Key points:
- Proper separation of server and browser logic.
- Efficient singleton pattern for browser environment.
- Customized QueryClient configuration for optimal performance.
This implementation forms a solid foundation for the refactoring of queries mentioned in the PR objectives, particularly for components like Claim.tsx and InitialView.tsx.
src/config/wagmi.config.tsx (3)
9-9: Improved query client managementThe changes in imports, particularly the addition of
getQueryClientand the removal of the directQueryClientimport, represent a positive shift towards a more modular and flexible query client management approach. This aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing react-query usage and improving overall code structure.Benefits:
- Encapsulation: The query client creation is now abstracted, allowing for potential customization or different instances based on context.
- Flexibility: Using a factory function (
getQueryClient) provides more flexibility in how and when the query client is created.- Consistency: This approach ensures a consistent query client setup across the application.
Also applies to: 12-12
Line range hint
1-79: Summary of changes and their impactThe modifications to
src/config/wagmi.config.tsxrepresent a positive step towards better query management and align well with the PR objectives. Key improvements include:
- Modular query client creation through the use of
getQueryClient().- Encapsulation of query client instantiation within the
ContextProvider.- Improved flexibility for potential future customizations of query client configuration.
These changes contribute to a more maintainable and scalable codebase, reducing the likelihood of React-related bugs as mentioned in the PR objectives. The refactoring aligns with best practices for using react-query and should enhance team efficiency in the long run.
72-73: Improved query client instantiationThe change to use
getQueryClient()for creating the query client instance is a positive improvement. This approach offers several benefits:
- Flexibility: It allows for potentially different query client configurations based on the application's needs.
- Encapsulation: The query client creation is now encapsulated within the component, which could lead to better performance and resource management.
- Consistency: It ensures that the query client is created consistently across the application.
To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact existing functionality, please run the following verification:
This script will help verify the proper implementation and usage of
getQueryClient.src/app/claim/page.tsx (1)
35-35: Approved: Simplified function signatureGood job on removing the unused
paramsparameter from thegenerateMetadatafunction signature. This change improves code clarity and aligns with the function's implementation.src/components/Claim/useClaimLink.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Clarification needed: React-query migration statusThe PR objectives mention moving queries to react-query and useSuspense, as well as exporting calls into separate services. However, this file still uses a custom hook approach without react-query. Could you please clarify:
- Is this file intended to be part of the react-query migration?
- If so, are there plans to refactor the
claimLinkand other functions to use react-query in a future commit?- If not, should this file be excluded from the react-query migration, and if so, why?
This clarification will help ensure that the implementation aligns with the overall PR objectives.
src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-185: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and maintain component functionality.The modifications to
TokenSelectorXChain.tsxcontribute to the PR's goal of enhancing the page and flow structure. Key observations:
- Import statements have been optimized, reducing unnecessary dependencies.
- The core functionality of the component, including token filtering and selection, remains intact and efficient.
- Good performance practices are in place, with potential for minor optimizations.
- Accessibility features are present, with suggestions for further improvements.
These changes maintain the component's functionality while aligning with the broader objectives of the PR to improve code clarity and efficiency.
To ensure these changes integrate well with the overall refactoring effort:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration with react-query changes # Test: Check for any remaining useEffect hooks that might need refactoring echo "Checking for remaining useEffect hooks:" rg --type typescript "useEffect" src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx # Test: Verify if any react-query hooks are used in this component echo "Checking for react-query hook usage:" rg --type typescript "useQuery|useMutation|useQueryClient" src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsxThis will help ensure that the changes in this file are consistent with the broader refactoring efforts mentioned in the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-185: Component logic remains intact and functional.The core logic of the
TokenSelectorXChaincomponent appears to be unchanged and continues to function as expected. The filtering mechanism for displaying tokens, thesetTokenfunction, and the rendering logic for the button and modal are all preserved.To ensure the filtering mechanism is working as intended, particularly with the mentioned clarifications, run the following script:
This will help confirm that the filtering logic is implemented correctly and efficiently.
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
54-54: Approve type change, compatible with existing codeThe updated type
string | undefinedforclaimTxHashis fully compatible with its usage throughout the function:
- The truthy check at line 74 works correctly with the new type.
- The
utils.saveClaimedLinkToLocalStoragefunction andsetTransactionHashare only called whenclaimTxHashis truthy, ensuring they always receive a string value.- The error handling at line 82 correctly throws an error if
claimTxHashis falsy, aligning with the new type.This change enhances type safety without introducing any issues in the existing code.
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (4)
84-100: Handle potential zero value in 'amountUSD' calculationUsing
(tokenPrice ?? 0)could result inamountUSDbeing zero iftokenPriceis undefined. This might lead to incorrect point estimation.Ensure that
tokenPriceis defined and greater than zero before performing the calculation, or handle the scenario whentokenPriceis undefined to prevent passing an incorrectamountUSDto theestimatePointsquery.
190-192: Handle potential undefined 'recipient.name'The
recipient.namemight be undefined, leading to an error when callingAppAPI.getUserById(recipient.name). Ensure thatrecipient.nameis properly validated or provide a fallback.Add validation or default values to prevent errors when
recipient.nameis undefined.
88-93: Validate parameters for 'estimatePoints'Ensure that the parameters passed to
estimatePointsare valid and correctly formatted. Incorrect or undefined values foraddress,chainId, oramountUSDcould cause errors.Check that
recipient.address,chainId, andamountUSDare defined and valid before invokingestimatePoints.
172-175:⚠️ Potential issueInitialize 'route' variable before usage
In the
handleIbanRecipientfunction, the variablerouteis referenced but not assigned a value, leading to a comparison withundefinedthat will always be true.Consider fetching and assigning a value to
routebefore checking if it isundefined. If the intention is to useroutefrom the outer scope or a previous value, ensure it's properly initialized.let route try { setSelectedChainID(optimismChainId) setSelectedTokenAddress(usdcAddressOptimism) + route = await new PeanutAPI().getSquidRouteRaw(/* parameters */) } catch (error) { console.log('error', error) } if (route === undefined) { setErrorState({ showError: true, errorMessage: 'offramp unavailable', }) return }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| import { CrossChainDetails } from './services/cross-chain'; | ||
| import * as _consts from './Claim.consts' | ||
|
|
||
| export type Attachement = { message: string | undefined; attachmentUrl: string | undefined } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the spelling of "Attachement" to "Attachment".
The type definition is clear and appropriate. However, there's a spelling error in the type name.
Please apply the following change:
-export type Attachement = { message: string | undefined; attachmentUrl: string | undefined }
+export type Attachment = { message: string | undefined; attachmentUrl: string | undefined }Don't forget to update any references to this type throughout the codebase.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type Attachement = { message: string | undefined; attachmentUrl: string | undefined } | |
| export type Attachment = { message: string | undefined; attachmentUrl: string | undefined } |
| import ChainSelector from '../ChainSelector' | ||
| import { useBalance } from '@/hooks/useBalance' | ||
| import { peanutTokenDetails, supportedPeanutChains } from '@/constants' | ||
| import { peanutTokenDetails } from '@/constants' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Potential Issue Detected: Remaining References to Removed Imports
The shell script identified a reference to consts in TokenSelectorXChain.tsx:
}: _consts.TokenSelectorXChainProps) => {
This suggests that consts might still be in use, despite its import being removed. Please verify whether the consts import is indeed no longer needed and remove any remaining references if appropriate.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Import statements have been optimized.
The changes in the import statements appear to streamline the dependencies of this component. The addition of peanutTokenDetails and removal of unused imports (supportedPeanutChains, utils, and consts) align with best practices for keeping imports minimal and relevant.
To ensure all necessary imports are present and no unused imports remain, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify imports in TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
# Test: Check for any remaining references to removed imports
echo "Checking for references to removed imports:"
rg --type typescript "supportedPeanutChains|utils\.|consts\." src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
# Test: Verify the usage of peanutTokenDetails
echo "Verifying usage of peanutTokenDetails:"
rg --type typescript "peanutTokenDetails" src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
Length of output: 479
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify imports in TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
# Test: Check for any remaining references to removed imports
echo "Checking for references to removed imports:"
rg --type ts --type tsx "supportedPeanutChains|utils\.|consts\." src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
# Test: Verify the usage of peanutTokenDetails
echo "Verifying usage of peanutTokenDetails:"
rg --type ts --type tsx "peanutTokenDetails" src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
Length of output: 471
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify imports in TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
# Test: Check for any remaining references to removed imports
echo "Checking for references to removed imports:"
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' "supportedPeanutChains|utils\.|consts\." src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
# Test: Verify the usage of peanutTokenDetails
echo "Verifying usage of peanutTokenDetails:"
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' "peanutTokenDetails" src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
Length of output: 614
| if (linkDetails.tokenType != 0 && linkDetails.tokenType != 1) { | ||
| return undefined |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace magic numbers with descriptive constants for tokenType.
Using magic numbers like 0 and 1 for tokenType reduces code readability and maintainability. Consider defining an enumeration or constants to represent token types, such as TokenType.NATIVE and TokenType.ERC20.
Define an enum for TokenType:
enum TokenType {
NATIVE = 0,
ERC20 = 1,
// other token types...
}Then update the condition:
- if (linkDetails.tokenType != 0 && linkDetails.tokenType != 1) {
+ if (linkDetails.tokenType != TokenType.NATIVE && linkDetails.tokenType != TokenType.ERC20) {| {data && linkState === 'ALREADY_CLAIMED' && ( | ||
| <genericViews.AlreadyClaimedLinkView claimLinkData={data.linkDetails} /> | ||
| )} | ||
| {error && <genericViews.NotFoundClaimLink />} | ||
| {data && linkState === 'CLAIM_SENDER' && ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling for better user feedback
Currently, when an error occurs, the generic view NotFoundClaimLink is displayed. Consider providing more specific error messages based on the error content to improve user experience.
If the error object contains useful information, you might display a more detailed message or log it for debugging purposes.
{error && (
<genericViews.ErrorView message={error.message || 'An unexpected error occurred.'} />
)}| import { Attachement, CheckLinkReturnType } from './types' | ||
| import { getClaimQuery } from './services/query' | ||
|
|
||
| export const Claim = ({}) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary empty object pattern in component parameters
The Claim component accepts an empty object {} as its parameter, which is unnecessary since it doesn't use any props. This can be simplified for clarity.
Suggested fix:
-export const Claim = ({}) => {
+export const Claim = () => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const Claim = ({}) => { | |
| export const Claim = () => { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 15-15: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
| isLoading={refetchingRoute} | ||
| routeError={errorState.errorMessage === 'No route found for the given token pair.'} | ||
| routeFound={selectedRoute ? true : false} | ||
| routeFound={route ? true : false} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simplify boolean assignment
The expression route ? true : false is redundant. You can assign the boolean value of route directly to routeFound for simplicity.
Apply this change:
- routeFound={route ? true : false}
+ routeFound={Boolean(route)}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| routeFound={route ? true : false} | |
| routeFound={Boolean(route)} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 365-365: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| queryKey: ['route-to', { selectedChainID, selectedTokenAddress }, address, recipientType], | ||
| queryFn: async ({ queryKey }) => { | ||
| const { selectedChainID: toChain, selectedTokenAddress: toToken } = queryKey[1] as { | ||
| selectedChainID: string | ||
| selectedTokenAddress: string | ||
| } | ||
| return await new PeanutAPI().getSquidRouteRaw({ | ||
| linkDetails: claimLinkData, | ||
| toChain, | ||
| toToken, | ||
| toAddress: | ||
| recipientType === 'us' || recipientType === 'iban' || recipientType === undefined | ||
| ? '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C' | ||
| : recipient.address | ||
| ? recipient.address | ||
| : (address ?? '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C'), | ||
| }) | ||
| }, | ||
| initialData: undefined, | ||
| refetchOnMount: false, | ||
| enabled: tokenSelectedNeedsRouting, | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify 'toAddress' assignment for better readability
The nested ternary operators used in the toAddress assignment make the code difficult to read and maintain. Refactoring this logic will improve clarity.
Consider the following refactor:
- return await new PeanutAPI().getSquidRouteRaw({
- linkDetails: claimLinkData,
- toChain,
- toToken,
- toAddress:
- recipientType === 'us' || recipientType === 'iban' || recipientType === undefined
- ? '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C'
- : recipient.address
- ? recipient.address
- : (address ?? '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C'),
- })
+ const defaultAddress = '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C';
+ const isOfframpRecipient = recipientType === 'us' || recipientType === 'iban' || recipientType === undefined;
+ const recipientAddress = recipient.address || address || defaultAddress;
+ return await new PeanutAPI().getSquidRouteRaw({
+ linkDetails: claimLinkData,
+ toChain,
+ toToken,
+ toAddress: isOfframpRecipient ? defaultAddress : recipientAddress,
+ })📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| queryKey: ['route-to', { selectedChainID, selectedTokenAddress }, address, recipientType], | |
| queryFn: async ({ queryKey }) => { | |
| const { selectedChainID: toChain, selectedTokenAddress: toToken } = queryKey[1] as { | |
| selectedChainID: string | |
| selectedTokenAddress: string | |
| } | |
| return await new PeanutAPI().getSquidRouteRaw({ | |
| linkDetails: claimLinkData, | |
| toChain, | |
| toToken, | |
| toAddress: | |
| recipientType === 'us' || recipientType === 'iban' || recipientType === undefined | |
| ? '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C' | |
| : recipient.address | |
| ? recipient.address | |
| : (address ?? '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C'), | |
| }) | |
| }, | |
| initialData: undefined, | |
| refetchOnMount: false, | |
| enabled: tokenSelectedNeedsRouting, | |
| }) | |
| queryKey: ['route-to', { selectedChainID, selectedTokenAddress }, address, recipientType], | |
| queryFn: async ({ queryKey }) => { | |
| const { selectedChainID: toChain, selectedTokenAddress: toToken } = queryKey[1] as { | |
| selectedChainID: string | |
| selectedTokenAddress: string | |
| } | |
| const defaultAddress = '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C'; | |
| const isOfframpRecipient = recipientType === 'us' || recipientType === 'iban' || recipientType === undefined; | |
| const recipientAddress = recipient.address || address || defaultAddress; | |
| return await new PeanutAPI().getSquidRouteRaw({ | |
| linkDetails: claimLinkData, | |
| toChain, | |
| toToken, | |
| toAddress: isOfframpRecipient ? defaultAddress : recipientAddress, | |
| }) | |
| }, | |
| initialData: undefined, | |
| refetchOnMount: false, | |
| enabled: tokenSelectedNeedsRouting, | |
| }) |
nezz0746
force-pushed
the
exp/use-react-query-for-claim
branch
from
cff819a to
3f130db
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
src/services/peanut-api.ts (1)
1-101: Overall assessment: Good foundation with room for improvementThe
PeanutAPIclass provides a solid foundation for interacting with the peanut API. The use of TypeScript for type definitions enhances code readability and maintainability. However, there are several areas where the code can be improved:
- Make
baseURLandsquidRouterUrlconfigurable through the constructor.- Use a library like
bignumber.jsfor precise calculations ingetSquidRouteRaw.- Implement consistent error handling across all methods.
- Use async/await syntax consistently throughout the class.
- Remove potentially sensitive logging in production environments.
Implementing these suggestions will result in a more robust, maintainable, and secure API client.
Consider splitting this class into smaller, more focused classes or modules if it grows larger. For example, you could have separate classes for different API endpoints or functionalities.
src/components/utils/utils.ts (2)
6-37: LGTM! Consider using consistent formatting for nested objects.The removal of trailing commas in the
ISquidChainDatatype definition improves readability and consistency. However, for even better consistency, consider applying the same formatting to nested objects.For example, you could format the
nativeCurrencyobject like this:nativeCurrency: { name: string symbol: string decimals: number icon: string }This would make the entire type definition consistent in its formatting.
71-71: Consider maintaining consistent function signature formatting.While the single-line function signature for
checkTransactionStatusis more compact, it's inconsistent with the formatting of other functions in this file (e.g.,fetchDestinationChain). For better readability and consistency, consider using a multi-line format for all function signatures in the file.For example:
export async function checkTransactionStatus( txHash: string ): Promise<ISquidStatusResponse> { // Function implementation... }This would maintain consistency with other function declarations in the file and improve readability, especially for functions with longer signatures or multiple parameters.
src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx (2)
78-82: Remove commented-out code to improve readabilityThe code between lines 78 and 82 is commented out:
// if (data.crossChainDetails) { // setSelectedChainID(data?.crossChainDetails?.[0]?.chainId) // setSelectedTokenAddress(data?.crossChainDetails?.[0]?.tokens[0]?.address) // }If this code is no longer needed, consider removing it to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
Line range hint
96-114: Consider refactoring props passed toFlowManagerCurrently, a large number of props are being passed to the
FlowManagercomponent:<FlowManager recipientType={recipientType} step={step} props={ { onPrev: handleOnPrev, onNext: handleOnNext, onCustom: handleOnCustom, claimLinkData: data.linkDetails, crossChainDetails: data.crossChainDetails, // ...additional props } as _consts.IClaimScreenProps } />Passing many props can make the component difficult to maintain and understand. Consider grouping related props into an object or using a context provider to simplify prop management.
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (4)
100-100: Remove unnecessary console.log statementThe
console.logstatement on line 100 seems to be for debugging purposes and should be removed to clean up the console output in production.Apply this diff:
- console.log('queryKey', queryKey)
265-265: Remove debugging console.log statementsThere are
console.logstatements on lines 265, 271, and 276 that appear to be used for debugging. Consider removing them to prevent cluttering the console.Apply this diff:
- console.log({ address }) - console.log({ address }) - console.log('Recipient address is not set')Also applies to: 271-271, 276-276
133-133: Unused state variablefileTypeThe state variable
fileTypeis initialized but never updated or used. Consider removing it if it's not needed.Apply this diff:
- const [fileType] = useState<string>('')
561-561: Avoid rendering booleans in JSXThe
{claiming}expression will rendertrueorfalseas text next to theLoadingcomponent, which might not be intended.Apply this diff:
- <Loading /> {claiming} + <Loading />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/app/claim/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (13 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/services/cross-chain.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/services/query.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/useClaimLink.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/utils/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/config/wagmi.config.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/query.ts (1 hunks)
- src/services/app-api.ts (1 hunks)
- src/services/peanut-api.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- package.json
- src/app/claim/page.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx
- src/components/Claim/services/cross-chain.ts
- src/components/Claim/types.ts
- src/components/Claim/useClaimLink.tsx
- src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelectorXChain.tsx
- src/config/wagmi.config.tsx
- src/query.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx
[error] 15-15: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx
[error] 386-386: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
src/services/app-api.ts
[error] 1-13: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/components/Claim/services/query.ts (1)
1-8: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and concise.The import statements are well-organized and relevant to the file's functionality. No unused imports are present.
src/services/peanut-api.ts (5)
1-18: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-structuredThe imports and type definitions are clear, concise, and appropriate for the functionality of this file. The use of TypeScript types enhances code readability and maintainability.
72-85: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor
getAttachmentInfomethod for consistency and better error handlingThe
getAttachmentInfomethod can be improved in two ways:
- Use async/await for consistency with other methods and improved readability.
- Implement better error handling by logging errors before returning undefined.
Apply this diff to address these issues:
- getAttachmentInfo = async (link: string) => { - return this.post('/get-attachment-info', { - link, - }) - .then(({ fileUrl, message }) => { - return { - fileUrl, - message, - } - }) - .catch(() => { - return undefined - }) + getAttachmentInfo = async (link: string) => { + try { + const { fileUrl, message } = await this.post('/get-attachment-info', { link }); + return { fileUrl, message }; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error getting attachment info:', error); + return undefined; + } }This refactoring:
- Uses async/await for better readability and consistency with other methods.
- Logs errors before returning undefined, which helps with debugging while maintaining the original behavior.
To verify these changes, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for async/await usage and error handling in getAttachmentInfo # Test: Check for async/await and try-catch in getAttachmentInfo echo "Checking getAttachmentInfo implementation:" rg --type typescript -A 10 'getAttachmentInfo = async' src/services/peanut-api.ts
87-100: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor
postmethod for consistency and improved error handlingThe
postmethod can be improved in two ways:
- Use async/await consistently for better readability.
- Add explicit handling for network errors.
Apply this diff to address these issues:
post = async (url: string, body: any) => { - return fetch(this.baseURL + url, { - method: 'POST', - headers: { - 'Content-Type': 'application/json', - }, - body: JSON.stringify(body), - }).then((res) => { - if (!res.ok) { - throw new Error('HTTP error! status: ' + res.status) - } - return res.json() - }) + try { + const res = await fetch(this.baseURL + url, { + method: 'POST', + headers: { + 'Content-Type': 'application/json', + }, + body: JSON.stringify(body), + }); + if (!res.ok) { + throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${res.status}`); + } + return await res.json(); + } catch (error) { + if (error instanceof TypeError) { + console.error('Network error:', error); + throw new Error('Network error occurred'); + } + throw error; + } }This refactoring:
- Uses async/await consistently throughout the method.
- Adds explicit handling for network errors (TypeError), which can occur if the fetch fails due to network issues.
- Uses template literals for string interpolation, which is a minor improvement in readability.
To verify these changes, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for async/await usage and error handling in post method # Test: Check for async/await and try-catch in post method echo "Checking post method implementation:" rg --type typescript -A 20 'post = async' src/services/peanut-api.ts
20-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider making
baseURLandsquidRouterUrlconfigurableCurrently,
baseURLandsquidRouterUrlare hardcoded within thePeanutAPIclass. To enhance flexibility and facilitate testing with different environments (development, staging, production), consider injecting these URLs through the constructor.Apply this diff to modify the class:
export class PeanutAPI { - baseURL: string = PEANUT_API_URL - squidRouterUrl: string = 'https://apiplus.squidrouter.com/v2/route' + baseURL: string + squidRouterUrl: string + constructor( + baseURL: string = PEANUT_API_URL, + squidRouterUrl: string = 'https://apiplus.squidrouter.com/v2/route' + ) { + this.baseURL = baseURL + this.squidRouterUrl = squidRouterUrl + } // ... rest of the class }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
47-70: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor
estimatePointsmethod for better error handling and async/await usageThe
estimatePointsmethod has several areas for improvement:
- It logs its arguments, which might expose sensitive information in production.
- It uses promise chaining instead of the more modern and readable async/await syntax.
- Error handling silently returns 0 without logging the error.
Apply this diff to address these issues:
- estimatePoints = async (args: EstimatePointsArgs) => { + estimatePoints = async ({ address, actionType, amountUSD, chainId }: EstimatePointsArgs) => { - const { address, actionType, amountUSD, chainId } = args - - console.log('estimatePoints', { args }) - - return this.post('/calculate-pts-for-action', { - actionType: actionType, - userAddress: address, - chainId: chainId, - amountUsd: amountUSD, - transaction: { - from: address, - to: address, - data: '', - value: '', - }, - }) - .then((res) => { - return Math.round(res.points) - }) - .catch(() => { - return 0 - }) + try { + const res = await this.post('/calculate-pts-for-action', { + actionType, + userAddress: address, + chainId, + amountUsd: amountUSD, + transaction: { + from: address, + to: address, + data: '', + value: '', + }, + }); + return Math.round(res.points); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error estimating points:', error); + return 0; + } }This refactoring:
- Removes the potentially sensitive logging.
- Uses async/await for better readability.
- Logs errors before returning 0, which helps with debugging while maintaining the original behavior.
To verify these changes, run the following script:
src/components/utils/utils.ts (1)
41-68: LGTM! Consistent formatting applied.The removal of trailing commas in the
ISquidStatusResponsetype definition is consistent with the changes made toISquidChainData. This improves overall code consistency and readability.src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx (1)
88-94: Loading indicator implemented correctlyThe loading indicator is appropriately displayed while data is being fetched, enhancing user experience.
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (1)
386-386: Simplify boolean assignmentThe expression
route ? true : falseis redundant. You can assign the boolean value ofroutedirectly torouteFoundfor simplicity.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 386-386: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| export class AppAPI { | ||
| static getUserById(id: string) { | ||
| return fetch('/api/peanut/user/get-user-id', { | ||
| method: 'POST', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| }, | ||
| body: JSON.stringify({ | ||
| accountIdentifier: id, | ||
| }), | ||
| }).then((res) => res.json()) | ||
| } | ||
| } No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor API service for improved structure, error handling, and type safety
While the implementation aligns with the PR objective of exporting calls into separate services, there are several areas for improvement:
- Structure: Consider using a simple function instead of a class with static methods. This aligns with best practices and the static analysis suggestion.
- Error Handling: Add proper error handling for network issues and non-200 responses.
- Type Safety: Enhance type safety by defining an interface for the expected response.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
interface User {
id: string;
// Add other user properties as needed
}
export async function getUserById(id: string): Promise<User> {
try {
const response = await fetch('/api/peanut/user/get-user-id', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
},
body: JSON.stringify({ accountIdentifier: id }),
});
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`);
}
return await response.json() as User;
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error fetching user:', error);
throw error;
}
}This refactored version:
- Uses a simple async function instead of a class.
- Implements proper error handling.
- Improves type safety with the
Userinterface. - Uses
async/awaitfor better readability.
Would you like me to implement this refactoring or do you prefer to make these changes yourself?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 1-13: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
| export const fetchClaim = async (link: string) => { | ||
| let linkState: _consts.claimLinkState = 'ALREADY_CLAIMED' | ||
| let crossChainDetails: CrossChainDetails | undefined = undefined | ||
| let tokenPrice: number = 0 | ||
| let estimatedPoints: number = 0 | ||
| let recipient: { name: string | undefined; address: string } = { name: undefined, address: '' } | ||
|
|
||
| const linkDetails: interfaces.ILinkDetails = await peanut.getLinkDetails({ | ||
| link, | ||
| }) | ||
| const attachmentInfo = await new PeanutAPI().getAttachmentInfo(linkDetails.link) | ||
|
|
||
| if (linkDetails.claimed) { | ||
| linkState = 'ALREADY_CLAIMED' | ||
| } else { | ||
| crossChainDetails = await getCrossChainDetails(linkDetails) | ||
| tokenPrice = | ||
| (await utils.fetchTokenPrice(linkDetails.tokenAddress.toLowerCase(), linkDetails.chainId))?.price ?? 0 | ||
|
|
||
| // NOTE: Let client estimate points | ||
| // estimatedPoints = await estimatePoints({ | ||
| // address: address ?? '', | ||
| // chainId: linkDetails.chainId, | ||
| // amountUSD: Number(linkDetails.tokenAmount) * tokenPrice, | ||
| // actionType: ActionType.CLAIM, | ||
| // }) | ||
|
|
||
| linkState = 'CLAIM' | ||
| } | ||
| return { | ||
| linkDetails, | ||
| attachmentInfo: { | ||
| message: attachmentInfo?.message, | ||
| attachmentUrl: attachmentInfo?.fileUrl, | ||
| }, | ||
| crossChainDetails, | ||
| tokenPrice, | ||
| estimatedPoints, | ||
| recipient, | ||
| linkState, | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall structure and logic look good, but there are some improvements to be made.
The fetchClaim function effectively retrieves and processes claim details. However, there are a few points to address:
-
Error handling is missing for API calls. Consider wrapping the function body in a try-catch block to handle potential errors from
peanut.getLinkDetailsandnew PeanutAPI().getAttachmentInfo. -
The
recipientvariable is initialized but never used. If it's not needed, consider removing it. -
The
estimatedPointscalculation is commented out. If this feature is no longer needed, remove the commented code and the variable. If it's still required, implement the calculation or add a TODO comment explaining why it's commented out.
Here's a suggested improvement for error handling:
export const fetchClaim = async (link: string) => {
try {
// Existing function body
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error fetching claim:', error);
throw error; // or handle it as appropriate for your use case
}
}Remove the unused recipient variable if it's not needed:
- let recipient: { name: string | undefined; address: string } = { name: undefined, address: '' }Either implement the estimatedPoints calculation or remove the commented code and variable:
- let estimatedPoints: number = 0
- // NOTE: Let client estimate points
- // estimatedPoints = await estimatePoints({
- // address: address ?? '',
- // chainId: linkDetails.chainId,
- // amountUSD: Number(linkDetails.tokenAmount) * tokenPrice,
- // actionType: ActionType.CLAIM,
- // })If the calculation is still needed but not implemented yet, consider adding a TODO comment explaining the situation.
| export const getClaimQuery = (link: string): FetchQueryOptions<CheckLinkReturnType> => { | ||
| const params = new URLSearchParams(link.split('?')[1]).toString() | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| queryKey: ['claiming-', params], | ||
| queryFn: ({ queryKey }) => { | ||
| console.log('queryKey: ', queryKey) | ||
| const searchParams = queryKey[1] | ||
| const link = `https://peanut.to/claim?${searchParams}` | ||
| return fetchClaim(link) | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The query configuration looks good, but there are some potential improvements.
The getClaimQuery function effectively constructs a query configuration for fetching claims. However, there are a couple of points to address:
-
There's a potential issue when parsing URL parameters. The current implementation assumes that the
linkalways contains a?character, which might not always be the case. -
The base URL is hardcoded, which could reduce flexibility across different environments.
To handle the potential error when parsing URL parameters, consider this improvement:
const linkParts = link.split('?');
const queryString = linkParts.length > 1 ? linkParts[1] : '';
const params = new URLSearchParams(queryString).toString();Consider using a configurable base URL instead of hardcoding it. This could be done using an environment variable or a configuration file:
const baseUrl = process.env.REACT_APP_CLAIM_BASE_URL || 'https://peanut.to/claim';
const link = `${baseUrl}?${searchParams}`;Make sure to define the REACT_APP_CLAIM_BASE_URL environment variable in your project configuration.
| getSquidRouteRaw = async ({ linkDetails, toChain, toToken, toAddress }: GetSquidRouteRawArgs) => { | ||
| const { squidRouterUrl } = this | ||
| const { | ||
| chainId: fromChain, | ||
| tokenAddress: fromToken, | ||
| tokenAmount, | ||
| tokenDecimals, | ||
| senderAddress: fromAddress, | ||
| } = linkDetails | ||
| const fromAmount = Math.floor(Number(tokenAmount) * Math.pow(10, tokenDecimals)).toString() | ||
| return getSquidRouteRaw({ | ||
| squidRouterUrl, | ||
| fromChain, | ||
| fromToken, | ||
| fromAmount, | ||
| slippage: 1, | ||
| fromAddress, | ||
| toToken, | ||
| toChain, | ||
| toAddress, | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Improvements Not Implemented
BigNumberis neither imported nor used in thegetSquidRouteRawmethod.- The
getSquidRouteRawmethod lacks error handling with a try-catch block.
🔗 Analysis chain
Improve precision and error handling in getSquidRouteRaw
The getSquidRouteRaw method has two areas for improvement:
- The calculation of
fromAmountmay lead to precision errors due to JavaScript's limitations with floating-point arithmetic and large numbers. - The method doesn't handle potential errors from the
getSquidRouteRawfunction.
To address these issues:
- Use a library like
bignumber.jsfor precise calculations:
+ import BigNumber from 'bignumber.js';
...
- const fromAmount = Math.floor(Number(tokenAmount) * Math.pow(10, tokenDecimals)).toString()
+ const fromAmount = new BigNumber(tokenAmount)
+ .multipliedBy(new BigNumber(10).pow(tokenDecimals))
+ .integerValue(BigNumber.ROUND_FLOOR)
+ .toString()- Add error handling:
getSquidRouteRaw = async ({ linkDetails, toChain, toToken, toAddress }: GetSquidRouteRawArgs) => {
// ... existing code ...
- return getSquidRouteRaw({
- squidRouterUrl,
- fromChain,
- fromToken,
- fromAmount,
- slippage: 1,
- fromAddress,
- toToken,
- toChain,
- toAddress,
- })
+ try {
+ return await getSquidRouteRaw({
+ squidRouterUrl,
+ fromChain,
+ fromToken,
+ fromAmount,
+ slippage: 1,
+ fromAddress,
+ toToken,
+ toChain,
+ toAddress,
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Error in getSquidRouteRaw:', error);
+ throw error; // or handle it as appropriate for your use case
+ }
}To verify the impact of these changes, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for BigNumber usage and error handling in getSquidRouteRaw
# Test: Search for BigNumber import and usage
echo "Checking for BigNumber usage:"
rg --type typescript 'import BigNumber from' src/
rg --type typescript 'new BigNumber' src/
# Test: Check for try-catch block in getSquidRouteRaw
echo "Checking for error handling in getSquidRouteRaw:"
rg --type typescript -A 10 'getSquidRouteRaw = async' src/services/peanut-api.ts
Length of output: 283
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for BigNumber usage and error handling in getSquidRouteRaw
# Test: Search for BigNumber import and usage
echo "Checking for BigNumber usage:"
rg --type ts 'import BigNumber from' src/
rg --type ts 'new BigNumber' src/
# Test: Check for try-catch block in getSquidRouteRaw
echo "Checking for error handling in getSquidRouteRaw:"
rg --type ts -A 10 'getSquidRouteRaw\s*=\s*async' src/services/peanut-api.ts
Length of output: 812
| const { data, error, isLoading } = useSuspenseQuery<CheckLinkReturnType>( | ||
| getClaimQuery(typeof window !== 'undefined' ? window.location.href : '') | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure getClaimQuery handles empty URL strings appropriately
In the following code:
const { data, error, isLoading } = useSuspenseQuery<CheckLinkReturnType>(
getClaimQuery(typeof window !== 'undefined' ? window.location.href : '')
)When window is undefined (e.g., during server-side rendering), an empty string is passed to getClaimQuery. Ensure that getClaimQuery can handle an empty URL string without causing errors or unintended behavior.
| mutationFn: ({ address, link }: { address: string; link: string }) => { | ||
| return claimLinkGasless({ address, link }) | ||
| }, | ||
| onSettled: (claimTxHash) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use onSuccess instead of onSettled for successful mutations
The onSettled callback is invoked regardless of success or error. Since the logic inside should only execute after a successful mutation, use the onSuccess callback instead.
Apply this change:
- onSettled: (claimTxHash) => {
+ onSuccess: (claimTxHash) => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| onSettled: (claimTxHash) => { | |
| onSuccess: (claimTxHash) => { |
| {(() => { | ||
| console.log({ | ||
| claiming, | ||
| isValidRecipient, | ||
| refetchingRoute, | ||
| inputChanging, | ||
| hasFetchedRoute, | ||
| route, | ||
| recipient, | ||
| }) | ||
| return null | ||
| })()} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary self-invoking function
The self-invoking function starting at line 547 is logging variables and returning null. This code is unnecessary and can be removed to improve readability.
Apply this diff:
- {(() => {
- console.log({
- claiming,
- isValidRecipient,
- refetchingRoute,
- inputChanging,
- hasFetchedRoute,
- route,
- recipient,
- })
- return null
- })()}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {(() => { | |
| console.log({ | |
| claiming, | |
| isValidRecipient, | |
| refetchingRoute, | |
| inputChanging, | |
| hasFetchedRoute, | |
| route, | |
| recipient, | |
| }) | |
| return null | |
| })()} |
| setRecipient({ name: undefined, address: '' }) | ||
| await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 100)) | ||
| setRecipient({ name: undefined, address: address }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using setTimeout for state updates
Using setTimeout with a delay to manage state updates can lead to unpredictable behavior. It's better to handle sequential state updates without artificial delays.
Suggested refactor:
const handleConnectWallet = async () => {
if (isConnected && address) {
- setRecipient({ name: undefined, address: '' })
- await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 100))
- setRecipient({ name: undefined, address: address })
+ setRecipient({ name: undefined, address })
} else {
open()
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| setRecipient({ name: undefined, address: '' }) | |
| await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 100)) | |
| setRecipient({ name: undefined, address: address }) | |
| setRecipient({ name: undefined, address }) |
Summary
The aim was to deep dive into the page and flow structure while leaning on react-query for data fetching, storage, and handling in-app side effects (instead of relying on useEffect/useState).
Changes
Why ?
This helps minimize the potential for React bugs and boosts team efficiency. Relying too much on side effects from server data can lead to unexpected and hard-to-debug issues. We reduce data duplication previously stored in React state and benefit from react-query's built-in loading and error states, driving more predictable behaviors. Lastly, simple refactors like exporting calls into separate services help improve clarity.
Impact
Leaving this work here for review and feedback. Unfinished and could include bugs, It’s not intended for production at this time.