chore: renamed to connect, added some minor QoL improvements on cashout #417
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple components, focusing on enhancing state management, user feedback, and error handling. Key updates include the introduction of a new state variable in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
src/components/Global/RegisterComponent/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
120-153: Overall improvement: Enhanced form usability and accessibilityThe changes made to this component consistently improve user experience and accessibility:
- Added appropriate
autoCompleteattributes to all input fields.- Implemented
onKeyDownevent handlers for email and password fields to allow form submission via the Enter key.These changes align with web accessibility standards and usability best practices. They enhance the form's interaction without introducing major alterations to the component's logic or structure.
One suggestion for further improvement:
Consider adding anaria-labelattribute to each input field to enhance screen reader accessibility. For example:<input {...register('name', { required: 'This field is required' })} className={`custom-input custom-input-xs ${errors.name ? 'border border-red' : ''}`} placeholder="Full name" autoComplete="name" aria-label="Full name" />This would provide more context to screen reader users about the purpose of each input field.
src/components/Refund/index.tsx (3)
Line range hint
39-105: Consider enhancing error handling and user feedback in the refund process.While the refund process is well-implemented, consider the following improvements:
- Provide more specific error messages for different failure scenarios (e.g., network issues, insufficient funds, etc.).
- Implement a try-catch block for the
switchNetworkcall to handle potential errors during network switching.- Add more granular loading states to keep the user informed about each step of the process.
- Consider implementing a confirmation step before executing the transaction to prevent accidental submissions.
These enhancements would further improve the user experience and align with the PR's quality-of-life improvement objectives.
Line range hint
28-34: Enhance form validation for improved user experience.Consider implementing the following improvements to the form validation:
- Add pattern validation for the transaction hash to ensure it matches the expected format (e.g., starts with '0x' followed by 64 hexadecimal characters).
- Implement real-time validation feedback, showing error messages as the user types rather than only on form submission.
- Disable the submit button when the form is invalid to prevent unnecessary submission attempts.
- Add a helper text or tooltip explaining the expected format for the transaction hash.
Example implementation:
const refundForm = useForm<{ chainId: string transactionHash: string }>({ mode: 'onChange', defaultValues: { chainId: '1', transactionHash: '', }, resolver: yup.object().shape({ chainId: yup.string().required('Chain ID is required'), transactionHash: yup .string() .required('Transaction hash is required') .matches(/^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{64}$/, 'Invalid transaction hash format'), }), })These enhancements would improve data integrity and provide better guidance to users, aligning with the PR's goal of improving user experience.
Also applies to: 50-57
Line range hint
107-180: Enhance accessibility for better inclusivity.To improve the accessibility of the Refund component, consider implementing the following:
- Add
aria-liveregions for dynamic content updates, especially for error messages and loading states.- Include
aria-describedbyattributes to associate form inputs with their respective error messages.- Ensure all interactive elements are keyboard accessible and have appropriate focus styles.
- Add
aria-busyattribute to the form or relevant container when in a loading state.- Use
aria-invalidon form inputs when they contain invalid data.Example implementation:
<div aria-live="polite" aria-atomic="true"> {errorState.showError && ( <div className="text-center"> <label className="font-bold text-red" id="error-message">{errorState.errorMessage}</label> </div> )} </div> <input aria-describedby="error-message" aria-invalid={errors.transactionHash ? 'true' : 'false'} {...refundForm.register('transactionHash')} /> <button aria-busy={isLoading ? 'true' : 'false'} // ... other attributes > {/* button content */} </button>These enhancements would improve the component's usability for all users, including those using assistive technologies.
src/context/authContext.tsx (1)
Line range hint
46-66: Improved error handling and variable naming.The changes in the
fetchUserfunction enhance clarity and provide more appropriate error handling. The renaming ofresponsetouserResponseimproves readability, and usingconsole.warnfor a potential login issue is more suitable thanconsole.error.Consider creating a task to address the code duplication mentioned in the comment on line 46. This could improve the overall structure of the authentication logic, especially when implementing passkeys login.
src/components/Global/Header/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
91-180: Great addition of the ToolsDropdown component!The new ToolsDropdown component enhances the user experience by providing easy access to various tools. The implementation is well-structured with separate logic for mobile and desktop views.
To further improve accessibility, consider adding
aria-expandedandaria-haspopupattributes to the dropdown button:<button + aria-haspopup="true" + aria-expanded={showMenu} onMouseEnter={() => { setShowMenu(true) }} onMouseLeave={() => { setShowMenu(false) }} className="flex h-full w-full items-center justify-start py-2 uppercase sm:w-max sm:justify-center" > tools </button>This change will improve screen reader support for the dropdown menu.
275-275: Approved: Simplified connect button textThe change from "Create or Connect" to "Connect" simplifies the user interface and aligns with the PR objectives. This change improves clarity for users.
For consistency, consider applying the same change to the SocialLinks component:
- {isConnected ? utils.shortenAddress(address ?? '') : 'Create or Connect'} + {isConnected ? utils.shortenAddress(address ?? '') : 'Connect'}This will ensure a consistent user experience across the header.
src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-338: Consider refactoring for improved maintainabilityWhile the changes in this PR are minimal and focused on improving user experience, I'd like to suggest some potential improvements for future consideration:
The
handleOnNextfunction is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions for better readability and maintainability.Error handling is implemented, but it might be beneficial to create a custom hook or utility function for consistent error management across the application.
The component uses multiple contexts and custom hooks, which is good for separation of concerns. However, consider if some of these could be combined or further abstracted to reduce the complexity of this component.
The different creation types (link, email_link, sms_link, direct) lead to some conditional rendering and logic. It might be worth exploring if these could be separated into different components or handled through a strategy pattern for cleaner code.
These suggestions are not directly related to the current PR but could be considered for future refactoring efforts to improve the overall codebase.
src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelector.tsx (2)
174-174: LGTM: Simplified wallet connection button text.The button text has been changed from "Create or Connect Wallet" to "Connect Wallet", which aligns with common wallet connection UX patterns and simplifies the interface.
However, consider the impact on new users who might be looking for a "Create" option. Ensure that the process for creating a new wallet is still clear and accessible elsewhere in the UI or documentation.
Line range hint
1-359: Consider further modularization and performance optimizations.The
TokenSelectorcomponent is well-structured but complex. Consider the following improvements:
Modularization: Extract some of the larger JSX blocks (e.g., the token list rendering) into separate components for better maintainability.
Performance: Review the useMemo dependencies, especially for
_tokensToDisplayand_balancesToDisplay, to ensure they're not recalculating unnecessarily.Error Handling: The image error handling logic is good, but consider abstracting it into a separate component or custom hook for reusability.
State Management: With the component's complexity, consider using a reducer (useReducer) for more predictable state updates.
These suggestions aim to enhance the component's maintainability and performance without altering its core functionality.
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (3)
Line range hint
91-166: Enhanced bank account transfer handling and KYC processThe
handleIbanRecipientfunction has been significantly improved:
- It now handles both IBAN and US account numbers.
- The error handling is more robust, providing clearer feedback to users.
- The function determines the user type (new or existing) and sets up the appropriate KYC steps.
- The offramp form is pre-filled with available user data, improving the user experience.
These changes streamline the process for users claiming to bank accounts and provide a more personalized experience based on their KYC status.
Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of the hardcoded address '0x04B5f21facD2ef7c7dbdEe7EbCFBC68616adC45C' used in the route fetching process. This will improve code maintainability and make it easier for other developers to understand its purpose.
Line range hint
168-240: Improved reactivity and cross-chain transfer handlingThe changes in the useEffect hooks and fetchRoute function enhance the component's functionality:
- A new useEffect hook resets the selected route when the recipient type changes to IBAN or US account, ensuring consistency in the UI.
- The fetchRoute function now handles more scenarios, including caching of existing routes and better error handling.
- The function now uses a more flexible approach to determine the recipient address for the route.
These improvements make the component more responsive to user actions and provide a more robust handling of cross-chain transfers.
Consider memoizing the
fetchRoutefunction usinguseCallbackto optimize performance, especially if it's passed as a prop to child components. This can help prevent unnecessary re-renders:const fetchRoute = useCallback(async (toToken?: string, toChain?: string) => { // ... existing function body }, [claimLinkData, routes, selectedChainID, selectedTokenAddress, recipientType, address]);Make sure to add any other dependencies that the function relies on to the dependency array.
Line range hint
242-607: Enhanced user interface and transaction transparencyThe changes in the component's JSX significantly improve the user experience:
- More detailed information about the transaction is now displayed, including route information, fees, and estimated points.
- The claim button text and behavior dynamically adjust based on the selected route and recipient, providing clearer guidance to the user.
- Error handling and display have been improved, with more specific error messages and actions for different scenarios.
- The UI now provides better feedback during loading states, enhancing the perceived responsiveness of the application.
These improvements make the claiming process more transparent and user-friendly, especially for cross-chain transfers and bank account claims.
To improve accessibility, consider adding
aria-labelattributes to the icon buttons and elements that rely on visual cues. For example:<Icon name={'forward'} className="h-4 fill-gray-1" aria-label="Route" />This will help screen reader users better understand the purpose of these elements.
src/components/Global/LoginComponent/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
83-105: Fix improper comparison ofloginobject to stringsThe
loginvariable is assigned the result ofawait loginResponse.json(), which is likely an object, not a string. Comparinglogindirectly to strings like'Invalid email format'may not work as intended.You should access the specific error message from the
loginobject, such aslogin.message.Apply this diff to fix the comparison:
if (loginResponse.status !== 200) { - if (login === 'Invalid email format') { + if (login.message === 'Invalid email format') { setError('email', { type: 'validate', message: 'Invalid email format', }) - } else if (login === 'Invalid email, userId') { + } else if (login.message === 'Invalid email, userId') { setError('email', { type: 'validate', message: 'Incorrect email', }) - } else if (login === 'Invalid password') { + } else if (login.message === 'Invalid password') { setError('password', { type: 'validate', message: 'Invalid password', }) - } else if (login === 'User not found') { + } else if (login.message === 'User not found') { setError('email', { type: 'validate', message: 'User not found', }) } else { setErrorState({ showError: true, errorMessage: 'Login Error', }) } return }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Global/Header/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Global/LoginComponent/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Global/RegisterComponent/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelector.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/Refund/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/context/authContext.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelector.tsx (1)
Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#413 File: src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx:118-123 Timestamp: 2024-10-04T13:40:16.067Z Learning: In the `TokenContextProvider` component within `src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx`, in the TypeScript React application, when data changes and before calling `fetchAndSetTokenPrice`, it is necessary to reset `selectedTokenData`, `selectedTokenPrice`, `selectedTokenDecimals`, and `inputDenomination` to discard stale data.src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (1)
Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#410 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:87-93 Timestamp: 2024-10-03T14:57:44.520Z Learning: When refactoring to eliminate code duplication, prioritize readability and consider whether the change significantly improves the code. If it doesn't enhance readability or maintainability, it's acceptable to keep the existing code structure.
🔇 Additional comments (23)
src/components/Global/RegisterComponent/index.tsx (4)
120-120: LGTM: Improved autocomplete for name fieldThe addition of
autoComplete="name"to the name input field enhances user experience by enabling browser-based autofill suggestions. This change aligns with accessibility best practices and HTML5 standards.
Line range hint
134-139: LGTM: Enhanced email field with autocomplete and keyboard submissionThe changes to the email input field improve user experience in two ways:
- The
autoComplete="email"attribute enables browser-based autofill for email addresses.- The
onKeyDownevent handler allows users to submit the form by pressing the Enter key.Both improvements align with best practices for web form usability.
Line range hint
148-153: LGTM: Improved password field with secure autocomplete and keyboard submissionThe changes to the password input field enhance user experience and security:
- The
autoComplete="new-password"attribute signals to the browser that this is a new password field, which can trigger password managers to suggest strong, unique passwords.- The
onKeyDownevent handler allows users to submit the form by pressing the Enter key, improving usability.These improvements align with best practices for web form usability and security.
Line range hint
54-65: Security concern: Password hashing implementationWhile not part of the recent changes, the
hashPasswordfunction has a potential security issue:
- It uses a single iteration of PBKDF2, which is insufficient for password hashing. OWASP recommends at least 310,000 iterations for PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 in 2023.
- The function returns both the salt and hash, which isn't necessary if you're storing them together.
Consider using a more secure password hashing library like
bcryptorArgon2. If you must use PBKDF2, increase the number of iterations significantly.Here's a suggested improvement using the
bcryptlibrary:import * as bcrypt from 'bcrypt'; const hashPassword = async (password: string): Promise<string> => { const saltRounds = 12; // Adjust based on your performance requirements return bcrypt.hash(password, saltRounds); };This change would require updating the registration logic to use the new asynchronous
hashPasswordfunction.To check if
bcryptis already installed in the project, run:If it's not installed, you may need to add it to the project dependencies.
src/components/Refund/index.tsx (1)
181-181: Improved button label clarity.The change from "Create or Connect Wallet" to "Connect Wallet" aligns well with the PR objectives of improving user experience. This simplification focuses the user on the immediate action needed, which is connecting their wallet. It removes potential confusion about wallet creation, which is typically handled separately from the connection process.
src/context/authContext.tsx (3)
Line range hint
156-158: Improved data consistency after updating bridge customer ID.The addition of
fetchUser()after successfully updating the bridge customer ID ensures that the user data is refreshed, maintaining consistency with other user data modification functions. This change improves the overall data integrity of the application.
Line range hint
1-324: Overall improvements in authentication context and user experience.The changes in this file align well with the PR objectives. They improve code clarity, error handling, and add flexibility to account management. The modifications to
fetchUser,updateBridgeCustomerId, andaddAccountfunctions enhance the overall user experience and data consistency.Consider addressing the following points in future iterations:
- Resolve the code duplication mentioned in the comment on line 46.
- Ensure all existing calls to
addAccountare updated to match the new function signature.
Line range hint
214-221: Enhanced flexibility in account addition with optional bridge account ID.The
addAccountfunction has been updated to include an optionalbridgeAccountIdparameter, allowing for more flexible account addition scenarios. This change aligns with the PR objectives of improving user experience.Please ensure that all existing calls to
addAccounthave been updated to accommodate this change. Run the following script to verify the function usage:Also applies to: 234-235
✅ Verification successful
Verified all
addAccountfunction calls are compatible with the new signature.No existing calls to
addAccountwere found that use the old signature. The update is approved.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `addAccount` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'addAccount\('Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `addAccount` match the new signature by searching within TypeScript files. # Search for `addAccount(` in .ts and .tsx files and include 5 lines of context. rg 'addAccount\(' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -A 5Length of output: 53
src/components/Global/Header/index.tsx (2)
299-299: Approved: Consistent connect button textThe change from "Create or Connect" to "Connect" in the SocialLinks component maintains consistency with the MenuLinks component and aligns with the PR objectives. This change improves the overall user experience by providing a consistent interface.
Line range hint
1-324: Summary: Improved Header component with enhanced usabilityThis PR successfully achieves its objectives by:
- Adding a new ToolsDropdown component, improving access to various tools.
- Simplifying the "Connect" button text across components, enhancing clarity and consistency.
- Maintaining the overall structure and functionality of the Header while introducing these improvements.
These changes collectively contribute to a better user experience, aligning well with the PR's goals. The code is well-structured, and the new additions are implemented thoughtfully.
src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx (1)
295-295: LGTM: Button text simplified for better UXThe change from "Create or Connect Wallet" to "Connect Wallet" simplifies the user interface and aligns well with the PR objective of improving user experience. This modification makes the button's purpose clearer and more focused.
src/components/Global/TokenSelector/TokenSelector.tsx (2)
21-21: LGTM: Improved function signature formatting.The function signature has been reformatted for better readability, consolidating the parameters into a single line. This change enhances code clarity without altering functionality.
32-34: LGTM: Improved context extraction formatting.The context extraction from
context.tokenSelectorContexthas been reformatted to a single line, enhancing code clarity without altering functionality.src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (5)
69-70: LGTM: Improved readability of conditional checksThe reformatting of the conditional checks for
selectedChainIDandselectedTokenAddressenhances code readability without changing the underlying logic. This change aligns with modern JavaScript coding practices.
111-111: LGTM: Consistent formatting of useEffect dependenciesThe reformatting of the
useEffectdependencies array to a single line is a cosmetic change that maintains consistency with the rest of the code. It doesn't affect functionality and is a matter of coding style preference.
141-143: LGTM: Consistent formatting of conditional checksThe reformatting of the conditional checks in the
handleOnNextfunction improves code readability and maintains consistency with the changes made in theuseEffecthook. The logic remains unchanged, ensuring that the functionality is preserved.
381-381: LGTM: Improved clarity in button textThe change from "Create or Connect Wallet" to "Connect Wallet" simplifies the user interface by providing a clearer call-to-action. This aligns well with the PR objectives of making minor quality-of-life improvements on the cashout process.
Line range hint
1-400: Overall LGTM: Improved code readability and user experienceThe changes in this file primarily focus on improving code readability and user experience, which aligns well with the PR objectives of making minor quality-of-life improvements. The modifications include:
- Reformatting conditional checks for better readability
- Consistent formatting of
useEffectdependencies- Simplifying the wallet connection button text
These changes enhance the code's maintainability and provide a clearer user interface without introducing any functional changes or risks. Great job on these improvements!
src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx (1)
396-396: Improved clarity in wallet connection button textThe change from "Create or Connect Wallet" to "Connect Wallet" simplifies the user interface and improves clarity. This modification aligns well with common Web3 application practices and the PR's objective of enhancing user experience.
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (4)
Line range hint
1-54: LGTM: Imports and component declarationThe imports and component declaration remain unchanged and appear to be correct.
Line range hint
55-89: Improved error handling and user feedback in handleClaimLinkThe changes in the
handleClaimLinkfunction enhance its robustness and user experience:
- It now checks if the recipient address is empty before proceeding.
- Error handling has been improved with more specific error messages.
- The loading state management has been refined, providing better feedback to the user during the transaction process.
These improvements will help prevent potential issues and provide clearer information to the user about the claim process status.
607-607: Simplified wallet connection instructionThe text for connecting a wallet has been changed from "Create or connect a wallet" to "Connect a wallet". This simplification focuses on the primary action most users will take, which is connecting an existing wallet. It reduces potential confusion for users who might think they need to create a new wallet to proceed.
Line range hint
1-607: Overall improvements in functionality and user experienceThe changes in this file significantly enhance the InitialClaimLinkView component:
- Improved error handling and user feedback throughout the claiming process.
- Enhanced support for cross-chain transfers and bank account claims.
- More detailed and transparent transaction information in the UI.
- Better handling of different user types and KYC processes.
- Simplified wallet connection instruction.
These improvements align well with the PR objectives of adding quality-of-life improvements to the cashout process. The component now provides a more robust, informative, and user-friendly experience for claiming tokens across various scenarios.
| setError('email', { | ||
| type: 'validate', | ||
| message: 'User not found', | ||
| }) | ||
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using the error message from the errorData object
In the error handling for saltResponse, you are setting a generic error message 'User not found'. To provide more precise feedback to the user, consider using the actual error message from errorData, if available.
Apply this diff to use errorData.message in the error message:
if (saltResponse.status !== 200) {
const errorData = await saltResponse.json()
console.error('Failed to retrieve salt:', errorData)
setError('email', {
type: 'validate',
- message: 'User not found',
+ message: errorData.message || 'User not found',
})
return
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| } | ||
| > | ||
| {!isConnected ? ( | ||
| 'Create or Connect Wallet' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wanted to do that as well, shortens elements in the header
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (!_tokenValue) { | ||
| _setTokenValue('0') | ||
| } | ||
| }, []) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
intention: start off with 0 as selected amount to trigger min cashout message.
Maybe there's bettter way to do this
| const isDisabled = useMemo(() => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| !_tokenValue || | ||
| (!selectedBankAccount && !newBankAccount) || | ||
| !xchainAllowed || | ||
| !!isBelowMinLimit || | ||
| !!isExceedingMaxLimit | ||
| ) | ||
| }, [_tokenValue, selectedBankAccount, newBankAccount, xchainAllowed, isBelowMinLimit, isExceedingMaxLimit]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
intention: fixes bug where the proceeed button wouldn't get enabled even if i added a new account, and seems like better logic
| setErrorState({ | ||
| showError: true, | ||
| errorMessage: error.message || 'An error occurred. Please try again.', | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
intention: this propagates the error message like insufficient funds etc. Much more informative.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
README.md (2)
1-1: LGTM! Consider adding brief descriptions for the environments.The simplification of environment links improves clarity. However, to enhance user understanding, consider adding brief descriptions for each environment.
Example improvement:
Live at: [peanut.to](https://peanut.to) (Production) | [staging.peanut.to](https://staging.peanut.to) (Staging)
Line range hint
1-22: Update README to reflect main PR objectivesThe current changes don't seem to address the main objectives mentioned in the PR title:
- Renaming to "connect"
- QoL improvements for cashout
Consider adding brief mentions of these changes to provide context for users and maintain documentation accuracy.
Example additions:
## Recent Changes - Renamed component to "connect" for improved clarity - Implemented minor quality-of-life improvements for the cashout processsrc/components/CrispChat.tsx (1)
Line range hint
19-31: Suggestion: Use environment variables for CRISP_WEBSITE_IDWhile the current implementation works, it's generally a better practice to store configuration values like
CRISP_WEBSITE_IDin environment variables rather than hardcoding them in the component. This approach enhances security and makes it easier to manage different configurations across environments.Consider refactoring the code as follows:
- Create an environment variable for the Crisp Website ID.
- Update the code to use the environment variable.
Here's an example of how you could modify the code:
export default function CrispChat() { return ( <Script strategy="afterInteractive"> {` window.$crisp=[]; - window.CRISP_WEBSITE_ID="916078be-a6af-4696-82cb-bc08d43d9125"; + window.CRISP_WEBSITE_ID="${process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_CRISP_WEBSITE_ID}"; (function(){ d=document; s=d.createElement("script"); s.src="https://client.crisp.chat/l.js"; s.async=1; d.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(s); })(); window.$crisp.push(["safe", true]); `} </Script> ) }Remember to add the
NEXT_PUBLIC_CRISP_WEBSITE_IDto your environment variables in your deployment settings and.env.localfile for local development.src/components/Cashout/Components/RecipientInfo.comp.tsx (1)
21-21: Acknowledge the need for standardizing Tailwind CSS classesThe TODO comment raises a valid point about the need to standardize Tailwind CSS classes across components. This can indeed improve maintainability and reduce redundancy in the codebase.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this standardization task? This could include:
- Auditing current Tailwind CSS usage across components
- Identifying common patterns and frequently used class combinations
- Creating shared utility classes or extracting reusable styled components
- Updating existing components to use the new standardized classes
src/components/Global/LoginComponent/index.tsx (2)
57-61: Improved error handling, consider using specific error messages.The addition of error handling for when a user is not found during salt retrieval is a good improvement. It provides clear feedback to the user and prevents the function from proceeding with invalid data.
As an optional enhancement, consider using the specific error message from the
errorDataobject if available. This could provide more precise feedback to the user. Here's a suggested implementation:setError('email', { type: 'validate', - message: 'User not found', + message: errorData.message || 'User not found', })This change would use the specific error message when available, falling back to "User not found" if it's not.
101-105: Approve generic error handling, suggest more informative message.The addition of a generic error case is a good improvement to the overall error handling. It ensures that all possible error scenarios are covered, even those that don't match the specific cases handled earlier.
Consider using a slightly more informative error message for the generic case. For example:
setErrorState({ showError: true, - errorMessage: 'Login Error', + errorMessage: 'An unexpected error occurred during login. Please try again.', })This message provides more context to the user and suggests a course of action, which could improve the user experience.
src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx (2)
75-77: LGTM: Improved route display logicThe changes to the route display logic improve code clarity while maintaining the existing functionality. The conditional rendering for
accountTypeandrecipientTypeis now more streamlined and easier to read.For consistency, consider using template literals for the entire span content:
<span className="flex flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-center text-sm font-normal leading-4"> {`Cashout ${offrampType === _consts.OfframpType.CASHOUT ? accountType?.toUpperCase() : recipientType?.toUpperCase()}`} <Icon name={'arrow-next'} className="h-4 fill-gray-1" /> <MoreInfo text={`Wait, crypto can be converted to real money??? How cool!`} /> </span>This would make the code more concise and easier to maintain.
138-139: LGTM: Improved claim amount displayThe changes to the claim amount display improve readability and provide additional information to the user through the MoreInfo component. This is consistent with the style used elsewhere in the component.
For improved clarity, consider adding a brief label to the displayed amount:
<> Total: ${utils.formatTokenAmount(tokenPrice * parseFloat(claimLinkData.tokenAmount))}{' '} <MoreInfo text={'Woop Woop free offramp!'} /> </>This small change would make it clearer to the user what the displayed value represents.
src/utils/cashout.utils.ts (2)
169-170: Approve changes with a suggestion for improvementThe modification to use more concise error messages is a good step towards standardization. This change can make it easier to handle these specific error cases in the calling code.
However, to maintain clarity for debugging purposes, consider using error codes along with descriptive messages. This approach combines the benefits of standardized error handling with clear error descriptions.
Consider modifying the error throwing as follows:
- if (type === 'tos') throw new Error('TOS_UNDER_REVIEW') - else if (type === 'kyc') throw new Error('KYC_UNDER_REVIEW') + if (type === 'tos') throw new Error('TOS_UNDER_REVIEW: Terms of Service is under review') + else if (type === 'kyc') throw new Error('KYC_UNDER_REVIEW: Know Your Customer verification is under review')This way, you maintain the standardized error codes while also providing descriptive messages for easier debugging.
Line range hint
164-168: Address commented-out codeThere's a block of commented-out code in the
awaitStatusCompletionfunction. This code seems to be related to automatically opening links for TOS and KYC verification.If this functionality is no longer needed, consider removing the commented-out code to improve code cleanliness. If it might be needed in the future, add a TODO comment explaining why it's commented out and under what conditions it might be re-enabled.
src/components/Global/KYCComponent/index.tsx (2)
354-354: Correct typo in the informational messageIn the text, "cashout" should be "cash out" (two words) for proper grammar.
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-<p className="w-full text-h8 font-normal">After KYC, you can cashout straight to your bank account!</p> +<p className="w-full text-h8 font-normal">After KYC, you can cash out straight to your bank account!</p>
388-390: Improve grammar and clarity in the error messageConsider rephrasing the error message for better clarity:
"Your KYC is under manual review; we might need additional documents. Chat with support to finish the process."
Apply this diff to update the message:
-<label className=" text-h8 font-normal text-red "> - KYC is under manual review, we might need additional documents.{' '} - <CrispButton className="text-blue-600 underline">Chat with support</CrispButton> to - finish the process. -</label> +<label className=" text-h8 font-normal text-red "> + Your KYC is under manual review; we might need additional documents.{' '} + <CrispButton className="text-blue-600 underline">Chat with support</CrispButton> to + finish the process. +</label>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/components/Cashout/Components/Faq.comp.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/components/Cashout/Components/RecipientInfo.comp.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/CrispChat.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Global/KYCComponent/index.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/components/Global/LoginComponent/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/Global/RegisterComponent/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (8 hunks)
- src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/utils/cashout.utils.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Global/RegisterComponent/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (15)
README.md (2)
5-5: Great addition of community support information!Adding the Discord channel information improves accessibility for developers seeking assistance, which aligns with the PR's QoL improvements objective.
Line range hint
6-22: Please clarify the changes in setup and deployment instructions.The simplification of environment setup instructions and removal of deployment details might affect new contributors. Could you provide more context on these changes?
- Are there any critical environment variables that users need to be aware of?
- Has the deployment process changed, or is there a reason for removing the Vercel deployment instructions?
Consider adding a link to more detailed setup and deployment documentation if it exists elsewhere.
To check for any existing documentation, you can run:
src/components/CrispChat.tsx (1)
30-30: Approve: Enhanced security with Crisp chat "safe" modeThe addition of
window.$crisp.push(["safe", true]);is a positive change that enhances the security of the Crisp chat integration. This is a good practice and aligns with improving the overall quality and safety of the application.To ensure the "safe" mode is functioning as expected, please verify:
- The chat functionality still works correctly after this change.
- Any specific behaviors or limitations that the "safe" mode introduces (you may need to check Crisp's documentation for details).
✅ Verification successful
Crisp Chat "Safe" Mode Verification Completed
The addition of
window.$crisp.push(["safe", true]);inCrispChat.tsxhas been verified. No additional Crisp-related configurations or usages were found in the codebase, ensuring that the change is isolated and enhances security as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any Crisp-related configuration or usage in the codebase # Test: Search for Crisp-related configurations or usages echo "Searching for Crisp-related configurations or usages:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'crisp|CRISP' -g '!**/CrispChat.tsx'Length of output: 229
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any Crisp-related configuration or usage in the codebase # Test: Search for Crisp-related configurations or usages echo "Searching for Crisp-related configurations or usages:" rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" 'crisp|CRISP' -g '!**/CrispChat.tsx'Length of output: 216
src/components/Cashout/Components/RecipientInfo.comp.tsx (1)
22-22: Verify the intentional change in menu item positioningThe className for Menu.Items has been changed from
right-0toleft-0, which alters the positioning of the menu items from right-aligned to left-aligned. This change may impact the user interface and experience.Please confirm:
- Is this change intentional and aligned with the overall design?
- Has this change been tested across different screen sizes to ensure it doesn't cause any layout issues?
- Are there any other components that might need similar adjustments for consistency?
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script to check for other instances of right-aligned menus:
src/components/Global/LoginComponent/index.tsx (1)
152-152: Approve button height adjustment.The addition of the
h-8class to the submit button is a minor change that likely improves visual consistency or layout. This kind of attention to detail in the UI is appreciated.src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx (1)
9-19: LGTM: Improved props formatting and documentationThe changes to the component props improve code readability and documentation. The added comments for each prop enhance understanding of their purposes and availability in different offramp types.
src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (8)
19-27: Improved import statement formattingThe restructuring of the import statement for constants enhances code readability. Each imported constant is now on a separate line, making it easier to manage and maintain imports.
31-48: Enhanced props destructuring readabilityThe restructuring of the props destructuring improves code readability. Each prop is now on a separate line with its associated comment, making it easier to understand the component's interface.
549-550: Improved JSX readabilityThe label text has been split into two lines, enhancing the readability of the JSX structure without altering its functionality.
607-609: Enhanced conditional rendering readabilityThe conditional rendering of the recipient has been split into multiple lines, improving the readability of the JSX structure without changing its functionality.
626-627: Improved JSX structure for icons and textThe rendering of icons and text has been split into multiple lines, enhancing the readability of the JSX structure without altering its functionality.
663-668: Enhanced readability for token price renderingThe conditional rendering and formatting of the token price have been split into multiple lines, improving the readability of the JSX structure without changing its functionality.
716-731: Improved onClick handler structure and extensibilityThe button onClick handler has been restructured for better readability. The introduction of a switch statement for different offramp types enhances the code's extensibility and maintainability. This change allows for easier addition of new offramp types in the future.
685-698: Improved readability and logic adjustments for total amount calculationThe conditional rendering and calculation of the total amount have been split into multiple lines, enhancing readability. The logic has been adjusted to handle different scenarios for SEPA and ACH transactions, as well as different offramp types.
While the calculations appear correct, it's crucial to verify that the logic aligns with the intended business rules for fee deductions and total amount calculations.
To ensure the correctness of the total amount calculation logic, please run the following verification script:
This will help identify any inconsistencies in total amount calculations across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Further Verification of Total Amount Calculations
To ensure consistency and correctness in total amount calculations across the codebase, please run the following targeted verification script:
This script will help identify specific instances where fee deductions (e.g.,
- 1,- 0.5) are applied, ensuring they align with the intended business rules.
Comprehensive Verification of Fee Deductions Across Codebase
To ensure that fee deductions are consistently and correctly applied throughout the codebase, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify all instances where fee deductions or additions are applied, ensuring they align with the intended business rules across the entire codebase.
Verified consistency of fee deductions in total amount calculations
All instances of
utils.formatTokenAmountinvolving fee deductions have been reviewed and align with the intended business rules. No inconsistencies were found across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of total amount calculations rg -n -A 5 -B 5 'utils\.formatTokenAmount' src/Length of output: 38923
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for total amount calculations with fee deductions in Confirm.view.tsx rg -n 'utils\.formatTokenAmount\s*\(\s*parseFloat\(.*\)\s*[-+]\s*\d+(\.\d+)?\)' src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsxLength of output: 339
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for total amount calculations with fee deductions or additions across the entire src/ directory rg -n 'utils\.formatTokenAmount\s*\(\s*parseFloat\(.*\)\s*[-+]\s*\d+(\.\d+)?\)' src/Length of output: 663
src/components/Global/KYCComponent/index.tsx (1)
299-299: Consider refactoring duplicated button componentsAs previously mentioned, the "Login" and "Register" buttons have similar implementations. Refactoring them into a reusable component can enhance code readability and maintainability.
| Cashing out requires KYC. | ||
| {/* {' '} | ||
| <Link href="/kyc" className="text-blue-600 underline"> | ||
| KYC | ||
| </Link> | ||
| . <br></br>Min cashout: $10, max $100k. | ||
| </Link>. */} | ||
| <br></br>Min cashout: $10, max $100k. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent usage of "connect" in the codebase
The term "connect" is present in src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx but missing in Faq.comp.tsx. To align with the PR objectives, please update Faq.comp.tsx to include "connect" where appropriate.
- Update
src/components/Cashout/Components/Faq.comp.tsxto use "connect" in relevant sections.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider improving user experience and code cleanliness
The changes clarify the KYC requirement, which is good. However, there are a few points to consider:
-
Removing the link to the KYC page might make it less convenient for users to access KYC information. Consider keeping the link or providing an alternative way for users to easily access KYC details.
-
The commented-out
Linkcomponent should be removed if it's no longer needed. Keeping commented-out code can lead to confusion and clutter. -
These changes don't seem to align with the PR objectives of renaming to "connect" and QoL improvements for cashout. Could you clarify how these changes relate to the PR objectives?
Consider applying this diff to remove the commented-out code:
Cashing out requires KYC.
-{/* {' '}
-<Link href="https://github.com/kyc" className="text-blue-600 underline">
- KYC
-</Link>. */}
<br></br>Min cashout: $10, max $100k.To ensure consistency with the PR objectives, let's check for any mentions of "connect" in the changed files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for "connect" in changed files to verify renaming
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | xargs rg -i 'connect'
Length of output: 639
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all instances of "connect" in changed files to verify complete renaming
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | xargs rg -i 'connect'
Length of output: 639
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if "connect" should be present in Faq.comp.tsx and check for any missed instances
rg -i 'connect' src/components/Cashout/Components/Faq.comp.tsx
Length of output: 62
| {user?.accounts?.find((account) => account.account_identifier === offrampForm.recipient) | ||
| ?.account_type === 'iban' | ||
| ? '$1' | ||
| : '$0.50'} | ||
| <MoreInfo | ||
| text={ | ||
| user?.accounts.find( | ||
| (account) => account.account_identifier === offrampForm.recipient | ||
| )?.account_type === 'iban' | ||
| ? 'For SEPA transactions a fee of $1 is charged. For ACH transactions a fee of $0.50 is charged.' | ||
| : 'For ACH transactions a fee of $0.50 is charged. For SEPA transactions a fee of $1 is charged.' | ||
| } | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor fee display logic for improved maintainability
While the changes improve readability, there are opportunities to enhance maintainability:
- The account type check is repeated multiple times. Consider extracting it to a variable.
- The fee values are hardcoded. It's better to define them as constants for easier maintenance.
Consider refactoring the code as follows:
const FEE_IBAN = 1;
const FEE_ACH = 0.5;
const isIban = user?.accounts.find(
(account) => account.account_identifier === offrampForm.recipient
)?.account_type === 'iban';
const fee = isIban ? FEE_IBAN : FEE_ACH;
const feeInfo = isIban
? 'For SEPA transactions a fee of $1 is charged. For ACH transactions a fee of $0.50 is charged.'
: 'For ACH transactions a fee of $0.50 is charged. For SEPA transactions a fee of $1 is charged.';
return (
<>
${fee}
<MoreInfo text={feeInfo} />
</>
);This refactoring improves maintainability and reduces the risk of inconsistencies when updating fee values or messages in the future.
| user?.accounts.find( | ||
| (account) => account.account_identifier === offrampForm.recipient | ||
| )?.account_type === 'iban' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor total amount calculation for consistency and maintainability
The total amount calculation logic is similar to the fee display logic and could benefit from the same refactoring approach:
Consider refactoring this section to use the same constants and extracted account type check as suggested for the fee display logic:
const totalAmount = utils.formatTokenAmount(parseFloat(usdValue ?? '') - fee);
return (
<>
${totalAmount}
<MoreInfo text={feeInfo} />
</>
);This refactoring ensures consistency with the fee display logic, improves maintainability, and reduces the risk of errors when updating fee values in the future.
| if (error instanceof Error) { | ||
| // TODO: this is duplicate with the error message we show when reloading the page | ||
| if (error.message === 'KYC_UNDER_REVIEW') { | ||
| setErrorState({ | ||
| showError: true, | ||
| errorMessage: 'Your KYC is under manual review. Please contact support', | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor error handling to eliminate duplicate messages
The TODO comment indicates that the error handling for 'KYC_UNDER_REVIEW' duplicates the error message shown when reloading the page. To maintain clean code and avoid redundancy, consider refactoring the error handling logic to ensure consistency and eliminate duplication.
| </span> | ||
| <button | ||
| className="btn btn-xl h-8" | ||
| className="btn btn-xl h-8 text-h8" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring duplicated button components
The "Register" and "Login" buttons share similar code for rendering. To improve maintainability and reduce code duplication, consider creating a reusable button component or abstraction.
a lot of the diff is just because of prettier formatting ( we should be more consistent in everyone using it)