chore: refactored banner. Failed at admin panel implementation #574
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements to the application's banner and cashout components. A new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (5)
src/components/Cashout/Cashout.tsx (5)
Line range hint
66-82: Move API integration to a separate service.The Squid Router API integration should be moved to a dedicated service layer for better separation of concerns and reusability. Additionally, the API key should not be hardcoded in the component.
- Create a new service file:
// src/services/squid.ts const SQUID_API_KEY = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_SQUID_API_KEY export const fetchCrossChainDetails = async () => { const response = await fetch('https://apiplus.squidrouter.com/v2/chains', { headers: { 'x-integrator-id': SQUID_API_KEY, }, }) if (!response.ok) { throw new Error('Squid: Network response was not ok') } return response.json() }
- Update the component:
-const fetchAndSetCrossChainDetails = async () => { - const response = await fetch('https://apiplus.squidrouter.com/v2/chains', { - headers: { - 'x-integrator-id': '11CBA45B-5EE9-4331-B146-48CCD7ED4C7C', - }, - }) - if (!response.ok) { - throw new Error('Squid: Network response was not ok') - } - const data = await response.json() - - setCrossChainDetails(data.chains) -} +const fetchAndSetCrossChainDetails = async () => { + try { + const data = await fetchCrossChainDetails() + setCrossChainDetails(data.chains) + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch cross-chain details:', error) + setCrossChainDetails([]) + } +}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 8-8: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
Line range hint
84-87: Add error handling to useEffect.The useEffect hook should handle potential errors from the API call to prevent unhandled promise rejections.
useEffect(() => { - fetchAndSetCrossChainDetails() + fetchAndSetCrossChainDetails().catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to fetch cross-chain details:', error) + }) }, [])🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 8-8: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
Line range hint
89-127: Separate test logic from production code.The URL parameter handling for testing purposes should be moved to a separate test environment. This prevents potential security issues and keeps production code clean.
Consider using environment variables or feature flags to control this behavior:
// src/config/features.ts export const isTestMode = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_TEST_MODE === 'true' // In component: useEffect(() => { if (!isTestMode) return // ... test setup logic }, [])🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 8-8: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
Line range hint
8-65: Consider breaking down the component state.The component has 17+ state variables, which makes it hard to maintain and understand. Consider using the reducer pattern or breaking it into smaller components.
Example approach using reducers:
type CashoutState = { screen: { step: _consts.ICashoutScreenState initialKYCStep: number } values: { token: string | undefined usd: string | undefined } transaction: { type: 'not-gasless' | 'gasless' hash: string cost: number | undefined } // ... group other related states } const cashoutReducer = (state: CashoutState, action: CashoutAction) => { switch (action.type) { case 'SET_STEP': return { ...state, screen: { ...state.screen, step: action.payload } } // ... other cases } }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 8-8: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
Line range hint
129-186: Consider using TypeScript properly instead ofany.The component uses
anytype in several places, which defeats the purpose of using TypeScript. This could lead to runtime errors.
- Replace
anywith proper types:-feeOptions: any | undefined +feeOptions: FeeOptions | undefined -} as any)} +} as CashoutScreenProps)}
- Define proper interfaces for the props:
interface FeeOptions { // ... define fee options structure } interface CashoutScreenProps { onPrev: () => void onNext: () => void tokenValue?: string // ... other props }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 8-8: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/config/routesUnderMaintenance.ts (2)
1-3: Consider enhancing type safety with route validationThe interface could benefit from runtime validation to ensure route strings follow a consistent format (starting with '/').
interface MaintenanceConfig { - routes: string[] + routes: Array<`/${string}`> }
12-17: Add documentation for maintenance state managementThe static configuration would benefit from additional documentation explaining:
- How often it should be updated
- Who is responsible for updates
- The deployment process for maintenance changes
-// Static configuration - edit this file to change maintenance state +/** + * Static configuration for routes under maintenance. + * + * @important + * - Updates to this file require a deployment to take effect + * - Coordinate with DevOps team before making changes + * - Verify changes in staging environment first + */ const config: MaintenanceConfig = {src/components/Global/Banner/MaintenanceBanner.tsx (2)
8-10: Optimize route checking performanceThe route checking logic could be memoized to prevent unnecessary recalculations.
+import { useMemo } from 'react' + export function MaintenanceBanner({ pathname }: MaintenanceBannerProps) { - const isUnderMaintenance = config.routes.some((route) => pathname.startsWith(route)) + const isUnderMaintenance = useMemo( + () => config.routes.some((route) => pathname.startsWith(route)), + [pathname] + )
15-15: Consider more flexible maintenance messagingThe maintenance message is currently hardcoded. Consider making it configurable based on the route or maintenance type.
- return <GenericBanner message="Under maintenance" icon="⚠️" /> + return ( + <GenericBanner + message={getMaintenanceMessage(pathname)} + icon={{ + symbol: "⚠️", + ariaLabel: "Warning: Maintenance in progress" + }} + /> + )src/components/Global/Banner/index.tsx (1)
10-12: Consider adding error boundaries around maintenance checks.The maintenance check is a critical path that could affect all users. While the current implementation is clean, adding error boundaries would prevent the entire banner from failing if the maintenance check throws an error.
// First check for maintenance -const maintenanceBanner = <MaintenanceBanner pathname={pathname} /> -if (maintenanceBanner) return maintenanceBanner +try { + const maintenanceBanner = <MaintenanceBanner pathname={pathname} /> + if (maintenanceBanner) return maintenanceBanner +} catch (error) { + console.error('Maintenance check failed:', error) + return null +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/components/Cashout/Cashout.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Global/Banner/GenericBanner.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Global/Banner/MaintenanceBanner.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Global/Banner/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/config/routesUnderMaintenance.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Global/Banner/index.tsx (2)
22-23: LGTM! Clean component exports.
The explicit exports of the new banner components improve modularity and make the component structure clear.
14-17: Verify beta message visibility conditions.
The beta message is shown for all request paths unless under maintenance. Let's verify this logic is consistent with the routes configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Beta message visibility logic is correctly implemented
The code is consistent with the routes configuration. The maintenance config shows that:
/requestis defined asMAINTAINABLE_ROUTES.REQUEST- Only
MAINTAINABLE_ROUTES.CASHOUTis currently under maintenance - The beta banner correctly shows for all request paths (
pathname.startsWith(MAINTAINABLE_ROUTES.REQUEST)) since the request route is not in the maintenance list
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the request routes in the maintenance config match the expected paths
# Search for MAINTAINABLE_ROUTES.REQUEST definition
rg -A 3 "MAINTAINABLE_ROUTES.*=.*{"
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the MAINTAINABLE_ROUTES definition
# Search for MAINTAINABLE_ROUTES without regex
rg "MAINTAINABLE_ROUTES" -A 3
# Also search for REQUEST path related constants
rg "REQUEST.*=.*" -A 2
Length of output: 1351
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the maintenance configuration to understand how it affects the REQUEST route
# Check the full content of routesUnderMaintenance.ts
cat src/config/routesUnderMaintenance.ts
# Also check if there are any other route configurations that might affect the REQUEST path
rg -g '!*.test.*' -g '!*.spec.*' '/request' -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 3426
| interface GenericBannerProps { | ||
| message: string | ||
| backgroundColor?: string | ||
| icon?: string | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding aria labels for accessibility
The icon prop should include accessibility attributes for screen readers.
interface GenericBannerProps {
message: string
backgroundColor?: string
- icon?: string
+ icon?: {
+ symbol: string
+ ariaLabel: string
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| interface GenericBannerProps { | |
| message: string | |
| backgroundColor?: string | |
| icon?: string | |
| } | |
| interface GenericBannerProps { | |
| message: string | |
| backgroundColor?: string | |
| icon?: { | |
| symbol: string | |
| ariaLabel: string | |
| } | |
| } |
| export function GenericBanner({ message, backgroundColor = 'bg-purple-1', icon }: GenericBannerProps) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <MarqueeWrapper backgroundColor={backgroundColor} direction="left"> | ||
| <span className="z-10 mx-4 text-sm font-semibold"> | ||
| {icon && <span className="mr-2">{icon}</span>} | ||
| {message} | ||
| </span> | ||
| </MarqueeWrapper> | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance component configurability and accessibility
The component needs several improvements:
- Default background color should be externalized to a theme configuration
- Icon needs proper accessibility attributes
- Missing test coverage for different prop combinations
-export function GenericBanner({ message, backgroundColor = 'bg-purple-1', icon }: GenericBannerProps) {
+export function GenericBanner({ message, backgroundColor = theme.banner.default, icon }: GenericBannerProps) {
return (
<MarqueeWrapper backgroundColor={backgroundColor} direction="left">
<span className="z-10 mx-4 text-sm font-semibold">
- {icon && <span className="mr-2">{icon}</span>}
+ {icon && (
+ <span
+ className="mr-2"
+ role="img"
+ aria-label={icon.ariaLabel}
+ >
+ {icon.symbol}
+ </span>
+ )}
{message}
</span>
</MarqueeWrapper>
)
}Would you like me to help create test cases for this component?
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| import { GenericBanner } from './GenericBanner' | ||
| import config from '@/config/routesUnderMaintenance' | ||
|
|
||
| interface MaintenanceBannerProps { | ||
| pathname: string | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export function MaintenanceBanner({ pathname }: MaintenanceBannerProps) { | ||
| const isUnderMaintenance = config.routes.some((route) => pathname.startsWith(route)) | ||
|
|
||
| if (!isUnderMaintenance) { | ||
| return null | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return <GenericBanner message="Under maintenance" icon="⚠️" /> | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error boundary for route configuration issues
The component should gracefully handle potential configuration errors.
+import { ErrorBoundary } from '@/components/ErrorBoundary'
+
export function MaintenanceBanner({ pathname }: MaintenanceBannerProps) {
const isUnderMaintenance = config.routes.some((route) => pathname.startsWith(route))
if (!isUnderMaintenance) {
return null
}
- return <GenericBanner message="Under maintenance" icon="⚠️" />
+ return (
+ <ErrorBoundary fallback={null}>
+ <GenericBanner message="Under maintenance" icon="⚠️" />
+ </ErrorBoundary>
+ )
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { GenericBanner } from './GenericBanner' | |
| import config from '@/config/routesUnderMaintenance' | |
| interface MaintenanceBannerProps { | |
| pathname: string | |
| } | |
| export function MaintenanceBanner({ pathname }: MaintenanceBannerProps) { | |
| const isUnderMaintenance = config.routes.some((route) => pathname.startsWith(route)) | |
| if (!isUnderMaintenance) { | |
| return null | |
| } | |
| return <GenericBanner message="Under maintenance" icon="⚠️" /> | |
| } | |
| import { GenericBanner } from './GenericBanner' | |
| import config from '@/config/routesUnderMaintenance' | |
| import { ErrorBoundary } from '@/components/ErrorBoundary' | |
| interface MaintenanceBannerProps { | |
| pathname: string | |
| } | |
| export function MaintenanceBanner({ pathname }: MaintenanceBannerProps) { | |
| const isUnderMaintenance = config.routes.some((route) => pathname.startsWith(route)) | |
| if (!isUnderMaintenance) { | |
| return null | |
| } | |
| return ( | |
| <ErrorBoundary fallback={null}> | |
| <GenericBanner message="Under maintenance" icon="⚠️" /> | |
| </ErrorBoundary> | |
| ) | |
| } |
| return null | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return <GenericBanner message="Under maintenance" icon="⚠️" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thought: we should use our icons, but I believe that is changing from current version to pw
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Cashoutcomponent with enhanced state management and data fetching capabilities.GenericBannercomponent for customizable marquee messages.MaintenanceBannercomponent to indicate site maintenance based on current routes.Modifications
Bannercomponent to conditionally display maintenance and request messages.