Skip to content

Hotfix for v9.0.0-rc.3 #1229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Hotfix for v9.0.0-rc.3 #1229

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

heyimalex
Copy link

From the discussion in #1078, this takes the v9.0.0-rc.3 tagged commit and applies the fix from #1150

To demonstrate the fix works, you can check out this branch which has instructions included in the readme. Repro is as bare minimum as I could get.

aleclarson and others added 2 commits May 11, 2020 16:19
`shared/helpers` wants entire `shared/globals` inside `isAnimatedString`, `shared/globals` wants `noop` from `shared/helper` to assign exported variable `willAdvance`.

If `shared/helpers` is executed before `shared/globals`, `willAdvance` is initialized by given value. Otherwise `willAdvance` is initialized after `noop` inside `shared/helpers` and has no defined value.

The safest way is keep `shared/helpers` pure and move `isAnimatedString` to own module.
@joshuaellis
Copy link
Member

Hey @heyimalex, why should this be merged over #1150? It looks to do the same? or have I missed something?

@joshuaellis joshuaellis added the v9 label Mar 18, 2021
@heyimalex
Copy link
Author

I think it's exactly the same, maybe avoids some merge conflicts. The goal was just to make it easy to release an rc4 based on the rc3 branch that prevents the linked issue, since it seemed like work has stalled a bit on v9 in general and cutting a new release off main wouldn't happen for a while.

@joshuaellis
Copy link
Member

closing in favour of #1150

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants