-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
[OIDC] Pending provider views, routes, forms #12646
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[OIDC] Pending provider views, routes, forms #12646
Conversation
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
N.B.: I'm currently planning on having the "pending" OIDC machinery share the same ratelimits as the normal OIDC machinery, since they have similar external resource requirements (accessing GitHub's API, JWKS endpoints, etc.). Edit: Done. |
…iting Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
...coverage needs to be brought back up. Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
…egistered ...potentially by someone else. Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
This is functionally complete (modulo the final API token exchange, which I'll do in a follow-up). Still needs unit test coverage, but I'll work on that now. |
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
…ovider-views Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Too confusing. Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
This should be good for another review pass! It doesn't include the tie-in functionality for converting a pending provider into a "normal" provider (and creating the corresponding project), but I can do that in a follow-on immediately afterwards. |
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with small nits!
Co-authored-by: Dustin Ingram <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really the only thing missing in any of this work is a way to interact/view it in pypi admin application. No blocker, but question: is this planned?
Yeah, we should add that to the follow-on tasks (at the very least, listing pending providers in admin). |
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
See #11296.
WIP. Pushing up for visibility.TODO: