[WIP] 2.0 #28
Merged
[WIP] 2.0 #28
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Change cov option to work on filesystem paths and make the help text more clear. Change reporting to indicating files and dirs written to. Also output warning if nothing to report on. Minimise imports by only importing if actually needed.
Also remove reading coverage config file.
English fixes in README
…eport with 4.0 files show up with extension).
…r library coverage.
… are properly applied.
…has show_missing=true. Ref #1.
… for `show_missing` option. This allows the `show_missing` specified in .coveragerc to be used. Ref #1.
…re 32/64bit variants).
Merge cov-core and pytest-cov packages and other fixes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Todo: tracked in #58 from now on.
data_suffix=Trueinstead of building it manuallybetter way to get coverage data from xdist slaves (e.g. transmit content of coverage data file)there is probably no better waycov-min#31)Ideas:
use coverage.py's way of measuring subprocesses(http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage/subprocess.html)single item which will break backwards compatibility, so no.