[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend PyBundledModule with extension.BundledModule
#10450
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…Module` #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
requested review from
JacobSzwejbka and
larryliu0820
as code owners
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10450
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
zhenyan-zhang-meta
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2025
…Module` #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) ghstack-source-id: 279969993 Pull Request resolved: #10450
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) ghstack-source-id: 280147380
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 280175151 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 280178134 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 280825734 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281069664 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281084621 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281088483 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281091723 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281093938 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281098114 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281114545 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281124470 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
…ion.BundledModule`" #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…Module` Pull Request resolved: #10450 #10447 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 281229771 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
PyBundledModulewithextension.BundledModule#10450extension.BundledModuleto Wrapextension.Modulewith Bundled Program Logic #10449extension.ModuleNamespaces from Aten and non-Aten #10576#10447
Context
This issue is a step of #9638.
In #9638, we want to have
extension.Moduleas the single source of implementation inpybindings, which means thatpybindings.PyModuleshould useextension.Modulerather than its ownpybindings.Module.Proposal
Now that we have
extension.BundledModuleready, we want to test it out by having our existingPyBundledModuleto extend it, and letverify_result_with_bundled_expected_outputto use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.pyDifferential Revision: D73564127