Skip to content

Allow non numbers and android video #216

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

danjenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

This branch needs updating in numerous ways and split out

Making a draft PR to discuss those things

@@ -436,7 +445,8 @@ private void registerPhoneAccount(Context appContext) {
handle = new PhoneAccountHandle(cName, appName);

PhoneAccount.Builder builder = new PhoneAccount.Builder(handle, appName)
.setCapabilities(PhoneAccount.CAPABILITY_CALL_PROVIDER);
.addSupportedUriScheme(PhoneAccount.SCHEME_SIP)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding this parameter make the startCall method displaying ConnectionService for another call account :
Screenshot_20200610-121943
And when I remove it :
Screenshot
Is there a way to enable SCHEME_SIP for a call account ? Or enable it only if we want to display SIP scheme ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤷 lol. Sorry! Like I said... I kinda made this branch for a specific need with a specific client and was going to put the work in to make it generic afterwards. Its not just this change, i removed the ability to place a call on hold for example.... because ultimately that should be something we pass in as a flag

@manuquentin
Copy link
Contributor

Can we close this PR as it seem to be continued in #237 ?

@danjenkins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

danjenkins commented Jul 20, 2020 via email

@sboily
Copy link
Member

sboily commented Jul 29, 2020

Hello @danjenkins, i made a PR for a first works on video support. Check #251. I don't understand why we need to keep this PR. What is the main target of this PR. The #237 is to supported self managed capability. Can we rename this PR to reflect what we want to achieve? Thank you.

@danjenkins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I only made this draft PR because you and @manuquentin asked me to from what I remember :) As a way of looking at the code and progressing it - it was never designed to be merged because theres multiple changes in here. If you've added video support for android in another PR then we can close this one! I'll end up making another to support non numbers (sip uris) when I get some time to make the changes work properly!

@danjenkins danjenkins closed this Jul 29, 2020
@sboily
Copy link
Member

sboily commented Jul 29, 2020

Yes yes i remember ;), thank you for this first work! A new PR with to support non numbers (sip uris) will be nice. Thank you!

Copy link

@HarshitPadalia HarshitPadalia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello is there any plan to merge this to main branch?

@HarshitPadalia
Copy link

or let me know you are facing any issues. so I can help to shoutout any problems you. are facing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants