-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Minor refactor format-args #12283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor refactor format-args #12283
Conversation
* Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct This should help with the future format-args improvements.
c6ed2ad
to
2c3ae88
Compare
Looks good to me, thank you for also refactoring this implementation :D @bors r+ |
Minor refactor format-args * Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct This should help with the future format-args improvements. **NOTE TO REVIEWERS**: use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified. Followig up from #12274 r? `@xFrednet` --- changelog: none
💔 Test failed - checks-action_test |
Bors is currently flaky... @bors retry |
Minor refactor format-args * Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct This should help with the future format-args improvements. **NOTE TO REVIEWERS**: use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified. Followig up from #12274 r? `@xFrednet` --- changelog: none
💔 Test failed - checks-action_test |
Bors please! 🙏 @bors retry |
I'll also give you the rights to retry (Because spaming will surely fix it ^^) @bors d+ |
Minor refactor format-args * Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct This should help with the future format-args improvements. **NOTE TO REVIEWERS**: use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified. Followig up from #12274 r? `@xFrednet` --- changelog: none
Perhaps we need another bot to auto-retry? let them fight it out? |
💔 Test failed - checks-action_test |
I wield magic power of thee, obey me @bors retry |
@nyurik: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users |
as always, robots have more power over me :( Help us @xFrednet , you are our only hope... |
@bors retry |
Minor refactor format-args * Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct This should help with the future format-args improvements. **NOTE TO REVIEWERS**: use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified. Followig up from #12274 r? `@xFrednet` --- changelog: none
💔 Test failed - checks-action_test |
Usually it works after the third retry, maybe let's just wait a bit. I'll retry it tomorrow |
thanks! I'll try it a bit later too... just for the fun of it :) |
@bors retry , and i won't muck you again! |
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
see! you had to be nice to bors ;) |
This should help with the future format-args improvements.
NOTE TO REVIEWERS: use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified.
Followig up from #12274
r? @xFrednet
changelog: none