Skip to content

Minor refactor format-args #12283

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

Minor refactor format-args #12283

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

nyurik
Copy link
Contributor

@nyurik nyurik commented Feb 12, 2024

  • Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct

This should help with the future format-args improvements.

NOTE TO REVIEWERS: use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified.

Followig up from #12274

r? @xFrednet


changelog: none

* Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct

This should help with the future format-args improvements.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Feb 12, 2024
@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me, thank you for also refactoring this implementation :D

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

📌 Commit 2c3ae88 has been approved by xFrednet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 2c3ae88 with merge 866a93c...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
Minor refactor format-args

* Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct

This should help with the future format-args improvements.

**NOTE TO REVIEWERS**:  use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified.

Followig up from #12274

r? `@xFrednet`

---

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

Bors is currently flaky...

@bors retry

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
Minor refactor format-args

* Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct

This should help with the future format-args improvements.

**NOTE TO REVIEWERS**:  use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified.

Followig up from #12274

r? `@xFrednet`

---

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 2c3ae88 with merge 0336a70...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

Bors please! 🙏

@bors retry

@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

I'll also give you the rights to retry (Because spaming will surely fix it ^^)

@bors d+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 2c3ae88 with merge 41de924...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
Minor refactor format-args

* Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct

This should help with the future format-args improvements.

**NOTE TO REVIEWERS**:  use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified.

Followig up from #12274

r? `@xFrednet`

---

changelog: none
@nyurik
Copy link
Contributor Author

nyurik commented Feb 12, 2024

Perhaps we need another bot to auto-retry? let them fight it out?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@nyurik
Copy link
Contributor Author

nyurik commented Feb 12, 2024

I wield magic power of thee, obey me @bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

@nyurik: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

@nyurik
Copy link
Contributor Author

nyurik commented Feb 12, 2024

as always, robots have more power over me :(

Help us @xFrednet , you are our only hope...

@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

Rust bors doesn't know d+ only delegate

@bors delegate+

Please respect @nyurik, they are an excellent contributor

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

✌️ @nyurik, you can now approve this pull request!

If @xFrednet told you to "r=me" after making some further change, please make that change, then do @bors r=@xFrednet

@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
Minor refactor format-args

* Move all linting logic into a single format implementations struct

This should help with the future format-args improvements.

**NOTE TO REVIEWERS**:  use "hide whitespace" in the github diff -- most of the code has shifted, but relatively low number of lines actually modified.

Followig up from #12274

r? `@xFrednet`

---

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 2c3ae88 with merge 29263d6...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

Usually it works after the third retry, maybe let's just wait a bit. I'll retry it tomorrow

@nyurik
Copy link
Contributor Author

nyurik commented Feb 12, 2024

thanks! I'll try it a bit later too... just for the fun of it :)

@nyurik
Copy link
Contributor Author

nyurik commented Feb 12, 2024

@bors retry , and i won't muck you again!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 2c3ae88 with merge 4350678...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: xFrednet
Pushing 4350678 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 4350678 into rust-lang:master Feb 12, 2024
@nyurik nyurik deleted the ref-format-args branch February 12, 2024 22:44
@nyurik
Copy link
Contributor Author

nyurik commented Feb 12, 2024

see! you had to be nice to bors ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants