Skip to content

clarify rustc_do_not_const_check comment #142528

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

@fee1-dead fee1-dead commented Jun 15, 2025

Given that we have used this attribute for other reasons before it seems appropriate to make this a "usually".

Add function name as a pointer

cc @rust-lang/wg-const-eval

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 15, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 15, 2025

rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead.

cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 15, 2025
@ChayimFriedman2
Copy link
Contributor

Please send a PR against https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/ instead.

@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member Author

Oh, hm.. I thought this was in rust-lang/rust, let me check again

@fee1-dead fee1-dead force-pushed the push-rlxklunqkwmv branch from f058aa8 to 64f5c74 Compare June 15, 2025 07:18
@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 15, 2025
@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jun 15, 2025

Heh. Where do we use it for other purposes? May be worth mentioning examples

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Given that we have used this attribute for other reasons before it seems appropriate to make this a "usually".

Did we? I think there was a proposal to do that and I vehemently opposed it. I don't remember anything ever landing.

@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member Author

fee1-dead commented Jun 15, 2025 via email

@fee1-dead fee1-dead force-pushed the push-rlxklunqkwmv branch from 64f5c74 to a0db28f Compare June 15, 2025 12:40
@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member Author

Ok it should now be uncontroversial

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r? oli-obk

(but seems good to me)

@rustbot rustbot assigned oli-obk and unassigned Mark-Simulacrum Jun 15, 2025
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ pub const INERT_ATTRIBUTES: &[BuiltinAttribute] = &[
rustc_legacy_const_generics, Normal, template!(List: "N"), ErrorFollowing,
INTERNAL_UNSTABLE
),
// Do not const-check this function's body. It will always get replaced during CTFE.
// Do not const-check this function's body. It will always get replaced during CTFE via `hook_special_const_fn`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no such function in RA so does this comment really make sense here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the file is largely a copy of the rustc one.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 16, 2025

📌 Commit a0db28f has been approved by RalfJung

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 16, 2025
tgross35 added a commit to tgross35/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
…v, r=RalfJung

clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` comment

~~Given that we have used this attribute for other reasons before it seems appropriate to make this a "usually".~~

Add function name as a pointer

cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138237 (Get rid of `EscapeDebugInner`.)
 - #140809 (Reduce special casing for the panic runtime)
 - #141990 (Implement send_signal for unix child processes)
 - #142082 (Refactor `rustc_attr_data_structures` documentation)
 - #142125 (Stabilize "file_lock" feature)
 - #142528 (clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` comment)
 - #142530 (use `if let` guards where possible)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
tgross35 added a commit to tgross35/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
…v, r=RalfJung

clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` comment

~~Given that we have used this attribute for other reasons before it seems appropriate to make this a "usually".~~

Add function name as a pointer

cc ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval``
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #140809 (Reduce special casing for the panic runtime)
 - #142082 (Refactor `rustc_attr_data_structures` documentation)
 - #142125 (Stabilize "file_lock" feature)
 - #142373 (Fix Debug for Location)
 - #142414 (ignore `run-make` tests that need `std` on targets without `std`)
 - #142416 (Assorted bootstrap cleanups (step 2))
 - #142431 (Add initial version of snapshot tests to bootstrap)
 - #142528 (clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` comment)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #141639 (Expose discriminant values in stable_mir)
 - #142082 (Refactor `rustc_attr_data_structures` documentation)
 - #142125 (Stabilize "file_lock" feature)
 - #142236 (Add documentation for `PathBuf`'s `FromIterator` and `Extend` impls)
 - #142373 (Fix Debug for Location)
 - #142416 (Assorted bootstrap cleanups (step 2))
 - #142431 (Add initial version of snapshot tests to bootstrap)
 - #142450 (Add documentation on top of `rustc_middle/src/query/mod.rs`)
 - #142528 (clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` comment)
 - #142530 (use `if let` guards where possible)
 - #142561 (Remove an `njn:` comment accidentaly left behind.)
 - #142566 (Fix `-nopt` CI jobs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit dc16682 into rust-lang:master Jun 16, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 16, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
Rollup merge of #142528 - fee1-dead-contrib:push-rlxklunqkwmv, r=RalfJung

clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` comment

~~Given that we have used this attribute for other reasons before it seems appropriate to make this a "usually".~~

Add function name as a pointer

cc ```@rust-lang/wg-const-eval```
compiler-errors pushed a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#141639 (Expose discriminant values in stable_mir)
 - rust-lang#142082 (Refactor `rustc_attr_data_structures` documentation)
 - rust-lang#142125 (Stabilize "file_lock" feature)
 - rust-lang#142236 (Add documentation for `PathBuf`'s `FromIterator` and `Extend` impls)
 - rust-lang#142373 (Fix Debug for Location)
 - rust-lang#142416 (Assorted bootstrap cleanups (step 2))
 - rust-lang#142431 (Add initial version of snapshot tests to bootstrap)
 - rust-lang#142450 (Add documentation on top of `rustc_middle/src/query/mod.rs`)
 - rust-lang#142528 (clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` comment)
 - rust-lang#142530 (use `if let` guards where possible)
 - rust-lang#142561 (Remove an `njn:` comment accidentaly left behind.)
 - rust-lang#142566 (Fix `-nopt` CI jobs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#141639 (Expose discriminant values in stable_mir)
 - rust-lang/rust#142082 (Refactor `rustc_attr_data_structures` documentation)
 - rust-lang/rust#142125 (Stabilize "file_lock" feature)
 - rust-lang/rust#142236 (Add documentation for `PathBuf`'s `FromIterator` and `Extend` impls)
 - rust-lang/rust#142373 (Fix Debug for Location)
 - rust-lang/rust#142416 (Assorted bootstrap cleanups (step 2))
 - rust-lang/rust#142431 (Add initial version of snapshot tests to bootstrap)
 - rust-lang/rust#142450 (Add documentation on top of `rustc_middle/src/query/mod.rs`)
 - rust-lang/rust#142528 (clarify `rustc_do_not_const_check` comment)
 - rust-lang/rust#142530 (use `if let` guards where possible)
 - rust-lang/rust#142561 (Remove an `njn:` comment accidentaly left behind.)
 - rust-lang/rust#142566 (Fix `-nopt` CI jobs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants