Skip to content

Fix typo in custom allocator docs. #29018

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2015
Merged

Fix typo in custom allocator docs. #29018

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2015

Conversation

solson
Copy link
Member

@solson solson commented Oct 13, 2015

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Thanks a ton!

@solson
Copy link
Member Author

solson commented Oct 22, 2015

The build error is spurious.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 22, 2015

📌 Commit 0d3d6e4 has been approved by steveklabnik

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2015
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 22, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 0d3d6e4 with merge ca998fc...

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 0d3d6e4 into rust-lang:master Oct 22, 2015
@solson solson deleted the doc-typo branch January 1, 2016 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants