-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 926
Add test cases for fixed issues #4189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
.long() | ||
.long() | ||
.long(), | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's this second one validating that's not covered by the first one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The first is a function, the second is the assert! macro. Per #3550 we want to see that assert! is formatted similar to regular function calls.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ha! and that's why reviewing PRs when half asleep isn't a great idea 😄
The cases with `hard_tabs: true` were fixed in 2836f9b. Not sure about the rest, but this suggests a number of open issues are already resolved. Closes rust-lang#3608 Closes rust-lang#3550 Closes rust-lang#3638 Closes rust-lang#3858 Closes rust-lang#3936
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you for your work!
The cases with
hard_tabs: true
were fixed in 2836f9b.Not sure about the rest, but this suggests a number of open issues are
already resolved.
Closes #3068
Closes #3550
Closes #3638
Closes #3858
Closes #3936