Skip to content

Language tweak in new Call for Testing section #3258

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2022
Merged

Language tweak in new Call for Testing section #3258

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion tools/DRAFT_TEMPLATE
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ If you are a Rust project owner and are looking for contributors, please submit

An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following
RFCs are at point where user testing is needed before moving forward:
RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tweaked the language of the last sentence to avoid implying that the feature development would block on user testing.

The impression I've gotten is that some RFCs are blocked on testing, sitting in limbo until there is feedback on it.

However, not all are blocked and its more in the "beneficial" category, so I think this generalizes this which is good.


<!-- Pre-Stabilization RFCs go here -->

Expand Down