Skip to content

Adding test to cover BigInt literal as PropertyName. #2486

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

caiolima
Copy link
Contributor

@rwaldron
Copy link
Contributor

rwaldron commented Feb 5, 2020

This duplicates #2457, however it covers more surface than the predecessor. Any thoughts on how I might resolve this?

Copy link
Contributor

@rwaldron rwaldron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some resolution between this and @mysticatea's #2457 needs to be made.

mysticatea added a commit to mysticatea/test262 that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2020
@caiolima
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing because it is being handled on #2457

@caiolima caiolima closed this Feb 11, 2020
@caiolima caiolima deleted the big-int-as-property-name branch February 11, 2020 15:39
rwaldron pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing tests for BigInt literals as ProeprtyName
2 participants