Skip to content

Removed run_all_in_graph_and_eager_mode in polynomial_test.py #1337

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 23, 2020
Merged

Removed run_all_in_graph_and_eager_mode in polynomial_test.py #1337

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 23, 2020

Conversation

gabrieldemarmiesse
Copy link
Member

See #1328

@bot-of-gabrieldemarmiesse

@tanzhenyu

You are owner of some files modified in this pull request.
Would you kindly review the changes whenever you have the time to?
Thank you very much.

Copy link
Contributor

@tanzhenyu tanzhenyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have any context, I assume there was a consensus to do so.

Copy link
Member

@seanpmorgan seanpmorgan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM as well. Thanks @tanzhenyu for the review. Yes, we've been moving away from this private decorator method and just ensuring that we support tf.function calls using eager+graph.

@seanpmorgan seanpmorgan merged commit 04e1edf into tensorflow:master Mar 23, 2020
jrruijli pushed a commit to jrruijli/addons that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2020
…flow#1337)

* Removed run_all_in_eager_and_graph_mode.

* Add the decorator to run in eager mode too.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants