Draft decision process #76
Conversation
Strawman of the decision making process to be discussed in the meeting on 20th April 2020
guidelines/decision-process.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## Preamble | ||
| The Chair Group discussion led to a consensus to start with a light weight consensus-based process that would eventually use voting as a last resort method in case of impasse.. The group could eventually be in need to defend its decision making process against trolls, yet at the moment all group members are considered in good faith, so the working group reserves the option to specify disciplinary actions against trolls as part of its guidelines at a later stage.. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why the double dots?
case of impasse..
later stage..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
First, not married to the double dots.. feel free to convert them to full stops.
Second, it's in the informal preamble/background piece indicating a topic that can have development, more could be said if necessary..
guidelines/decision-process.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## Preamble | ||
| The Chair Group discussion led to a consensus to start with a light weight consensus-based process that would eventually use voting as a last resort method in case of impasse.. The group could eventually be in need to defend its decision making process against trolls, yet at the moment all group members are considered in good faith, so the working group reserves the option to specify disciplinary actions against trolls as part of its guidelines at a later stage.. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so the working group reserves the option to specify disciplinary actions against trolls as part of its guidelines at a later stage..
Not sure about the phrase(if it should belong to another place)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is an informal preamble explanation of why the blacklisting process is TBD atm
The whole preamble can be deleted, it doesn't add anything normative, it's just to explain why the rules are currently lightweight and partially underspecified..
It is intended to help the reader of the normative part to understand why things are the way they are ;-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it is foolish to leave this undefined--having experienced some world-class trolls and/or ill-behaved persons (you haven't lived until you have received death threats online??). We'd be better off to handle this the way CLDR and ICU do: with a reference to the formal rules, located here. In practice, voting and such are almost never used in favor of consensus.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(you haven't lived until you have received death threats online??). We'd be better off t
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
We'd be better off to handle this the way CLDR and ICU do: with a reference to the formal rules, located here.
Agree!!
typos Co-Authored-By: Romulo Cintra <[email protected]>
Per consensus of the 18th April monthly meeting.
|
I removed Preamble.. This was agreed to be our decision making process in the monthly meeting on 20th April 2020. |
Strawman of the decision making process to be discussed in the wg monthly meeting on 20th April 2020