Skip to content

misleading coverage reports #3347

@d-v-b

Description

@d-v-b

codecov is flagging the changes in #3346 , which corrects a few typos, as having "0% coverage". Clearly there is something wrong with how codecov is calculating coverage. Is this something we can fix on our side?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions