Remove #ifndef NO_GREENTEA from tests

[orenc17]

Description

Remove #ifndef NO_GREENTEA from PSA tests as #9835 was merged

wait for #9823

Pull request type

[ ] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[X] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-psa @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers

Release Notes

[ciarmcom]

@orenc17, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-hal @ARMmbed/mbed-os-test @ARMmbed/mbed-os-crypto @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

[NirSonnenschein]

LGTM

[orenc17]

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers review is done, can we get this merged?

[jamesbeyond]

Hey @orenc17, I got a question here, if wen have NO_GREENTEA defined in greentea_test_env.cpp, why do we still need this in each test?

[orenc17]

@jamesbeyond This PR REMOVES all the excess defines from the tests

[jamesbeyond]

Sorry, I was mistaken this PR as adding them. one thing to mention, maybe that Macro should be called NO_GREENTEA_SYNC which is more make sense

[jamesbeyond]

Looks good!

[cmonr]

review is done, can we get this merged?

Sure, but at the moment, this is marked for 5.12.1. Until RC1 is generated, and the 5.12 branch made, we can't merge 5.12.1 PRs.

This could come into 5.12.1, but that would require an ACK from @ChiefBureaucraticOfficer

[cmonr]

CI started

[mbed-ci]

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 6 of 6 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

[0xc0170]

@orenc17 quick question - is this still up to date (been few days on hold due to 5.12rcs). If yes, can go in

[orenc17]

I'll rebase and verify

[orenc17]

@0xc0170 rebased and removed another usage of #ifdef NO_GREENTEA from PSA compliance tests

ready for CI

[0xc0170]

No more changes are expected there.

This was added to the rollup PR #10116 and it's currently in CI. If any new commit comes, please let us know immediately.