Skip to content

Postorder opcodes #641

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 21, 2016
Merged

Postorder opcodes #641

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 21, 2016

Conversation

titzer
Copy link

@titzer titzer commented Apr 5, 2016

This is a carry-over of #628 to binary version 11.

@rossberg
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

lgtm

@titzer titzer merged commit d18e5fd into binary_0xb Apr 21, 2016
@jfbastien jfbastien deleted the postorder_opcodes branch April 21, 2016 17:20
@qwertie
Copy link

qwertie commented Apr 22, 2016

Can someone point me to a rationale or discussion about the change to postorder?

lukewagner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2016
lukewagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2016
* Merge pull request #648 from WebAssembly/current_memory

Add current_memory operator

* Reorder section size field (#639)

* Prettify section names (#638)

* Extensible encoding of function signatures (#640)

* Prettify section names

* Restructure encoding of function signatures

* Revert "[Binary 11] Update the version number to 0xB."

* Leave index space for growing the number of base types

* Comments addressed

* clarify how export/import names convert to JS strings (#569) (#573)

* When embedded in the web, clarify how export/import names convert to JS strings (#569)

* Fixes suggested by @jf

* Address more feedback

Added a link to http://monsur.hossa.in/2012/07/20/utf-8-in-javascript.html.  Simplified the decoding algorithm thanks to Luke's feedback.

* Access to proprietary APIs apart from HTML5 (#656)

* comments

* Merge pull request #641 from WebAssembly/postorder_opcodes

Postorder opcodes

* fix some text that seems to be in the wrong order (#670)

* Clarify that br_table has a branch argument (#664)

* Add explicit argument counts (#672)

* Add explicit arities

* Rename

* Replace uint8 with varint7 in form field (#662)

This needs to be variable-length.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants