Skip to content

[Default Configuration Part1]: Add defaults mode configuration #2781

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2021

Conversation

zoewangg
Copy link
Contributor

@zoewangg zoewangg commented Oct 20, 2021

Description

Note that this will be merged to feature/master/defaults-mode branch instead of master once approved.

  • Added support to generate DefaultsMode. The generation logic is in codegen-lite and it will get generated when building sdk-core
  • Added defaults mode configuration as well as resolution logic.

Testing

Added tests

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have read the README document
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • A short description of the change has been added to the CHANGELOG
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
{
"version": 1,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just a temporary file for development. It will get replaced with the actual file before we release the feature.

@zoewangg zoewangg force-pushed the zoewang/defaults-mode-1 branch 2 times, most recently from 6790bcf to 23e33a3 Compare October 20, 2021 20:42
Copy link
Contributor

@dagnir dagnir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit: Just a minor comment

@zoewangg zoewangg force-pushed the zoewang/defaults-mode-1 branch from 23e33a3 to 861e4d2 Compare October 21, 2021 22:15
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 3 Code Smells

81.1% 81.1% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@zoewangg zoewangg merged commit 136752b into feature/master/defaults-mode Oct 21, 2021
@zoewangg zoewangg deleted the zoewang/defaults-mode-1 branch October 21, 2021 23:05
zoewangg added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2021
* Add support to generate DefaultsMode and implement configuration resolution (#2781)

* [Default Configuration Part 2]:Implement auto mode discovery (#2786)

* Implement auto mode discovery

* Fix tests on CodeBuild

* Address feedback

* Add comment and rename misnamed constant

* [Default Configuration Part 3]: add defaults from defaults mode to the configuration resolution chain (#2803)

* Wiring up configuration

* Address comments

* Add test

* Update debug statement and add singleton for AttributeMap

* Add tlsNegotiationTimeout (#2814)

* [Default Configuration Part 5]: Move default configuration related classes to aws-core (#2816)

* Move default configuration related classes to aws-core

* Remove extra space and fix build

* [Default Configuration Part 6]: apply default s3 us-east-1 regional setting (#2825)

* Add s3 regional setting

* Rename option name

* Fix checkstyle

* Update sdk-default-configuraiton.json

* Add changelog entry
aws-sdk-java-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2023
…f1ed8b869

Pull request: release <- staging/28d4199e-6322-4b24-a264-2c9f1ed8b869
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants